Nationalist Truth

Correction....

2010-04-06T02:40:00.000-07:00

On an earlier blog I accused Griffin of being the one responsible for release of the BNP membership list. I take that back....but stand by my assertion that he is a crook and much much more.

With this in mind, everything else on this blog site to the best of my knowledge is true. Some of my opinions have changed but the facts to the best of my knowledge are true and provide insight into how amongst many other things, the Establishment subverts political parties.

How Can Truth Be Communicated....

2008-12-31T05:03:00.000-08:00

...and who decides anyway ?

http://www.nwn-forum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=350

Merry Christmas

2008-12-24T07:18:00.000-08:00

Merry Christmas to everyone who has read this blog over the last year. Many thanks to the high quality of posts, particularly on the subject of banking and related matters.

Remember Political Prisoners At Christmas Time

2008-12-14T04:44:00.001-08:00

Spare a stamp and the time to write a few lines to those who sacrifice for the sake of Truth:

"

Regardless of your views ---

Remember these jailed Revisionists at Christmas 2008

2008 List of Incarcerated and Indicted Revisionists Addresses. Don't forget them. The season is the reason.
Whittle, Stephen ("Heretical Two" US asylum seeker)
0800006408
c/o Santa Ana Jail
P.O. Box 22003
Santa Ana, CA 92701
U.S.A.

Sheppard, Simon ("Heretical two" US asylum seeker)
0800006404
c/o Santa Ana Jail
P.O. Box 22003
Santa Ana, CA 92701
U.S.A.

Jim Trafficant (helped free John Demjanjuk)
#31213-060
ROCHESTER FMC
P.O. BOX 4000
ROCHESTER MN 55903

Germar Rudolf
Schloss 1
D-72108 Rottenburg
Germany

Ernst Zündel
J.V.A. Mannheim
Herzogenried Str. 111
D - 68169 Mannheim
F.R.G./BRD
Germany

Gerd Honsik
Justizanstalt Wien-Josefstadt
Wickenburggasse 18-22
1082Vienna,
AUSTRIA

Attorney Sylvia Stolz
JVA
Oberer Fauler Pelz 1
D- 69117 Heidelberg
GERMANY

Wolfgang Fröhlich
Justizanstalt Wien-Josefstadt
Wickenburggasse 18-22
1082Vienna,
AUSTRIA

At large but currently under indictment:

Horst Mahler
horst-mahler@gmx.de

Vincent Reyonard
If anyone wants to send Vincent Reynouard
money the best thing to do is to send one or two
bank notes inside an envelope and write on
the envelope, WITHOUT MENTIONING ANY NAME,
the following address:
V.H.O.
BP 256
B-1050 BRUXELLES 5
BELGIUM

Georges Theil
6 Rue Gallice
F-38100
Grenoble
FRANCE

http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/08/12/Xm...isionists.html

"

http://www.nwn-forum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=288

Common Purpose, 9/11 and Truth

2008-12-13T01:29:00.000-08:00

This from the Truthseeker website rightfully applauding an heroic attempt to get elements of the Establishment to see sense. This type of activism is rarely seen in our country. Everybody seems to be waiting for everybody else to do something...

"Andrew Johnson, an independent researcher not affiliated with any political party, group or association has recently sent letters to all 52 UK Police Chief Constables and 78 UK Military figures requesting they examine evidence relating to events on 9/11 and 7/7. He included leaflets that ask questions about the real nature of the destruction of the World Trade Centre, using a few of the thousands of pictures collected by a US-based former Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. Judy Wood.

Johnson states, "It is now almost 3 years since I first e-mailed Police Chief Constables regarding the issue of what really happened on 9/11 and I then tried to expose the Al Qaida myth. At that time, only 6 of them responded. Since writing those letters, I have become aware, mainly thanks to Dr. Judy Wood, of a whole range of new 9/11 evidence, which only a handful of people seem willing to discuss. This evidence shows that the WTC complex was destroyed using some type of directed energy weapon. Further, the evidence shows the 'fingerprint' of something known as 'The Hutchison Effect' - for example, in cars that are inverted and beams that are bent into a horseshoe shape, without any burn marks or crinkles in the metal."

Johnson has been on several US radio programmes to discuss the evidence and he has also presented it at small public events, in an effort to raise its profile. Additionally, with the same objective, he has, for some time, been distributing DVDs that discuss this same evidence.

"The implications of the evidence are most profound, and reveal that a weapon which can turn metal and other materials to dust, with little or no heat being generated, was used on 9/11. Additionally Dr. Wood's study of Alaska University Magnetometer data shows specific variations coinciding with events on 9/11. Further evidence in some of the videos of the second ‘plane’ impact supports the conclusion that a form of directed energy was also used to make the ‘plane-shaped’ holes."

Johnson also connects events on 9/11 to the issue of the cause of climate change (and "global warming") and he included information about this issue in his recent letters. He said, "For some people, it may seem like an odd connection to make, but that's because they are not aware of the Category 5 Hurricane - Erin - which made its closest approach to New York City at about 8am on 9/11/01. The path of the Hurricane shows that, on passing Bermuda, it more or less moved in a straight line, then slowed down as it was nearest to New York, then it made a right-hand turn and on 9/12/01 it moved out to sea. It is difficult or impossible for ordinary people to entertain the idea of weather control being in use on 9/11/01. Looking at the data, and other evidence that can be gathered, however, leads one to the conclusion that Erin being closest to NYC on 9/11 was not a coincidence."

Johnson states that he realises most people would not believe this conclusion, and he does not expect a large number of responses to the letters he has written. “So far, I have only had 5 responses to the Police Force mailing – essentially they are just acknowledgments.”

Johnson is also concerned about the activities of the “Common Purpose” educational charity. “Thanks to the diligent and ongoing research of Brian Gerrish, it has become clear to me that senior members of the Police, the BBC, Local Councils and other officials have undergone Common Purpose training. I have some concerns about what Common Purpose say on their website.”

‘Common Purpose programmes produce people who lead beyond their authority and can produce change beyond their direct circle of control.’

“This sounds a bit like a form of megalomania to me.” Johnson notes how it also seems to be true that some organisations are reluctant to release information about their use of Common Purpose training. “Someone who wrote to Cumbria County Council about Common Purpose training received a response which included this.”

‘The information is specific to the courses held by Common Purpose. It details the content and structure of the training provided by Common Purpose. If this information were disclosed to competitors, this could allow others to emulate their programme style, undermining its ability to provide unique leadership training. It would therefore be likely to, prejudice the commercial interests of Common Purpose.’

Johnson points out: “Common Purpose, claims to be a charity – therefore should not be in ‘commercial competition’ with anyone. Also, in a response from Derby City Council to me, it was stated that the Council was not able to release details about Common Purpose Training, as compiling the information would exceed the maximum cost of fulfilling an FOI request. Surely, if the County Council are pleased with the quality of training, they would want to extol the virtues of it when asked by the taxpayers?”

In describing his letter writing initiative he has said, “My action has been borne out of frustration and a feeling that only a few people seem to understand what is actually happening in our society. I have therefore taken it upon myself to present this data and ask these questions of authority – and I encourage others to do the same. All of this data, and the fact that Dr. Judy Wood has sued US Government Contractors for fraud over their contributions to the 9/11 NIST reports, can be easily verified – yet none of it is being either reported by mainstream media. Neither, for that matter, is it being dealt with by mainstream Science. I am therefore adopting a similar stance to that of Scholar and Musician Elias Davidsson. I now consider that all media people and those figures in authority who have been made aware of this data are now ‘on notice’ - to examine it and make the appropriate changes to their ways of working which this data necessitates. The denial and cover up must cease, and a new approach must be adopted and progressed as soon as possible.”

The letter Johnson has sent to Police Chiefs can be found at http://tinyurl.com/911ukpol and the one sent to Military leaders has can be found at http://tinyurl.com/911ukmil DVD’s, leaflets and other materials can also be obtained through the site.

Details of Dr. Judy Wood’s research and her action against NIST’s contractors can be found on her website.

www.prlog.org/10154069-uk-police-and-military-asked-to-study-911-evidence.html
"
http://thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=9818

Al-Qaeda = CIA and MOSSAD

2008-12-08T11:41:00.000-08:00

Nothing new in this assertion. Another indication to me of the bogus status of our mainstream media is, when various "authorities" on terrorism appear on news shows giving it "Al Qaeda this" and "Al Qaeda that" in answer to their well groomed articulate news anchor puppets. It's not news, it's advertising for the New World Order !

' "The Mumbai based group alleged that Al-Qaeda is a front organization of CIA and MOSSAD. "There is enough evidence that the Al-Qaeda is a front organization of the CIA and MOSSAD. The Bush junta has used the bogey of terror and of Al Qaeda to justify his unending and ever expanding Global War on Terror, which is only a means of capturing the resources of the world and of establishing the sole hegemony of Israel in West Asia," said the group of activists and intellectuals. The group is holding a press conference in Mumbai on Wednesday to "expose the links between Al-Qaeda and the CIA-MOSSAD".

Holding American-Israeli operation accomplices of the 9/11 attack on the WTC, the spokesman of the group said that this has been widely written about in USA and Europe itself and more than 50% of the American people and far more Europeans, now believe and are convinced about this fact. He said that sections of the Indian ruling political and military elite are importing the same Bush-Olmert formula into India..." '

http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/17121.asp

Plan "B"

2008-12-03T15:45:00.000-08:00

I posted this on the NWN forum. I am of the opinion that the struggle is a long term one. Politicians/Actors are concerned with short term things. Truth triumphs in the end although the path to power for the clever manipulators grants them short term rewards.

I believe Plan "B" is a spiritual path. It forgoes the short term politicking that seeks the approval of those benefiting in benefits or tax cuts in return for their vote. It is an unashamedly elitist aspiration.

http://www.nwn-forum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=218

'The mills of the gods grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine." (Sextus Empiricus)

Labour Liars

2008-12-01T08:51:00.000-08:00

Labour Liars or Conservative Con men. There's no difference between them. Someone has made a comment on Jacqui Smith in the linked article. I must say, she is the most obviously out of depth buffoon I think I have seen in such a prominent public position.

" Jack Straw is an Habitual Liar.

Jack Straw, so called Justice Minister, denies that he had any foreknowledge of the arrest of Damian Green.

Jack Straw denied directly to the BBC in the documentary "The Ambassador's Last Stand", and denied to the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, that he had any part in the false accusations laid against me or in my removal as Ambassador for raising human rights concerns. Yet, as detailed in Murder in Samarkand, I have obtained documents in Jack Straw's own handwriting, directing the process, and he held at least three meetings with Sir John Kerr to organise it.

On being sacked, I very openly leaked a number of government documents concerning UK policy, the use of torture material by our intelligence services, and the government's attempts to frame me. Most of these documents were classified more highly than the documents leaked to Damian Green, like this one for example:
http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/documents/Declaration.pdf

Yet when I leaked a number of highly classified documents, openly on the internet with my name and address, did the police come knocking at my door? No, they did not. They consulted Home Secretary John Reid, who consulted Foreign Secretary Jack Straw. They concluded that they should seek to kill the story, and not generate publicity by arresting me.

Does anybody really believe that Ministers decided whether someone as obscure as I should be arrested, but were not consulted on whether Damian Green should be arrested?

Jack Straw is a serial liar. Do not believe him."

http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2008/11/jack_straw_is_a.html

Police State Britain

2008-11-28T02:56:00.000-08:00

The police force always gives me the impression of a donkey chasing the pension carrot. Promotion is based on having the right political attitude. The right attitude often being formed and gauged in the numerous masonic lodges around Britain. The purpose of secret organisations is to subvert democratic institutions. Not too hard in an age of ignorance.

Britain was once held up as a model democracy. Many years ago I learnt in "O" level history that one of the philosophers of the French revolution, Montesquei admired the way Britain had a separation of powers: Judicial(judges and related), Executive(police etc) and Legislative(parliament). The idea of separation of power was to minimise those in power from being self serving. Some hope ! Perhaps someone could explain to me how Jack Straw can be an MP and Lord Chancellor ? This probably goes back sometime and seems wrong. In know of at least one clash of interest here and will write about it later.

Along with the latest persecution of BNP activists by the boys in blue the we have the spectre of an elected MP bring arrested for "leaking" information that he sincerely believed was in the national interest. ("They include: the publication of a Whips' Office memo detailing Labour MPs expected to vote against plans to detain terror suspects for 42 days without charge; a report in November last year that the Home Office was aware the Security Industry Authority had granted licences to 5,000 illegal workers; a report in February that an illegal immigrant was employed as a cleaner in the Home Office; and a letter from Home Secretary Jacqui Smith to the Prime Minister warning that recession could lead to a rise in violent crime.")

If only the police could be so efficient in tracing other leaks that might be of public interest - around 12,000 members of the public at least !

There is further speculation that since Boris Johnson the Conservative mayor of London dumped Ian Blair, Ian Blair then dumped on the Tory MP in question as an outgoing tit for tat. Montesquei what not have liked that !

As the the recession/depression/crunch gets deeper and deeper the prospect of a revolutionary tendencies increases. Apparently many ex US airforce bases in Britain are in working order, ready to offer free accommodation to political dissidents. I think I value freedom above everything - probably why I have never married - and I hope that if it should become necessary, God might give me the strength to die as a free man rather than live as a slave.

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say goodbye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling in terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand. The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst; the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"
-- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

Hitler - A Zionist Creation - Part Two

2008-11-26T09:29:00.000-08:00

"Blue Eyes" laid out a very convincing case for Hitler being a Zionist political creation in Hitler - A Zionist Creation - Part One. In response to my question in the comments, to what degree Hitler was aware of his puppet status, "Blue Eyes" develops the argument further :

"That is the really crucial question Simon. Was he a willing or unwilling pawn in this Zionist engineered heinous conflict?

David Icke has written a fantastic article entitled Was Hitler a Rothschild? -
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_rothschild04.htm

Hitler like many leaders of today was surrounded by a Zionist cabal - Heydrich, Goebbels, Rosenberg, Streicher and Eichmann.

Taken from Christopher Jon Bjerknes -
'The Nazis opposed the gold standard. The Nazis opposed the Capitalists and the unregulated private control of land and of loan capital. The Nazis took the Capitalists' money, but the intent of sincere Nazis was always to use this money to drive Jewish Capitalism from the European Continent forever.

And there were sincere Nazis, Hitler, Goebbels, Heydrich, Eichmann and other Bolshevik Zionists not among them.

So why did the Nazis, under Hitler's leadership, and through Gottfried Feder's tutelage, oppose the Jews' gold standard; and why did FDR, an agent of Jewish Communism, seize gold for the Jews; if Hitler was working for the Jews, and paper money unencumbered with debt is bad for the Jews?

The Jews wanted a prolonged and devastating Second World War, which would eclipse the carnage and destruction of WW I. There was not nearly enough gold in existence to provide the loan capital needed to finance the war machine required in Germany and America to fund the wartime economies of those nations. So the Jews taught Hitler, through Feder, how to make his own money, how to circulate it, and how to engage in international trade without throwing out all of Germany's growth into the slop bucket of Jewish usury, nor let the Jews intervene in international trade and harvest the wealth of German production as middlemen.

In this way, the Jews, who also poured money directly into Germany, financed Hitler in order to ultimately destroy Germany, and much of Europe, through Jewish manufactured war. They had done the same with their agent Napoleon Bonaparte, who considered himself to be the Jews' messiah, who tried to take Palestine for the Jews, who emancipated the Jews, and who was rewarded by the Jews with prison as punishment for promoting good Gentile-Jewish relations, which led to Jewish assimilation--the Jews most hated enemy.

The Zionists were afraid that the "Jewish race" was disappearing through assimilation. They wanted to use anti-Semitism to force the segregation of Jews from Gentiles and to unite Jews, and thereby preserve the "Jewish race". They hoped that if they put a Hitler-type into power—as Zionists had done in the past, they could use him to herd up the Jews of Europe and force these Jews into Palestine against their will. This would also help the Zionists to inspire distrust of, and contempt for, Gentile government, while giving the Zionists the moral high-ground in international affairs, despite the fact that the Zionists were secretly behind the atrocities.'

Hitler in pre-WWI Austria got heavily into The Occult and became a friend of the Jewish Lanz von Liebensfels author of the anti-Jewish magazine "Ostara" and founder of a secret society called "The Order of The New Templars."

He also became an admirer of the works of Jewish Occultist Helen Blatavsky and The Theosophical Society. Interestingly enough their symbol has on it a Swastika, Star of David and serpent! This can be found at:-
http://www.ts-adyar.org/emb_logo.gif

More information on Occult aspects of Hitler:-

Hitler and the Secret Societies -
http://www.illuminati-news.com/hitler-occult.htm

Satanism of Hitler -
http://www.cephas-library.com/nwo_satanism_of_hitler.html

Under the 1935 Nuremberg Laws, only two flags were permitted in Nazi Germany. One was the swastika. The other was the blue and white banner of Zionism. The Zionist party was the only other political party in Nazi Germany that enjoyed a measure of freedom, and could publish a newspaper.

Zionists had a record of cooperation with the Nazis in the 1930's. They had a trade plan by which German Jews could redeem their property in Nazi goods exported to Palestine. Adoph Eichmann also helped them set up training camps in Europe and even visited Palestine as their guest. In 1935 the steamer "Tel Aviv" made its maiden voyage from Nazi Germany to Haifa with Hebrew letters on its bow and a Nazi flag fluttering from its mast. The Captain of the Zionist-owned ship was a member of the Nazi Party. A passenger described the spectacle as a "metaphysical absurdity."

Actually it made perfect sense.

The ship transported German Jews who had taken advantage of the "Haavara" program, which allowed them to exchange their money for its value in Germany products in Palestine. As a result, the fledgling Jewish colony received about 70,000 highly educated German Jews and 140 million Reichmarks worth of German industrial equipment. This laid the foundation of Israel's infrastructure.

Zionists, welcomed the Nazis' anti Semitic policies. Like the Nazis, they believed in race-based national character and destiny. Like the Nazis, they believed Jews had no future in Germany. The co-operation extended to political and economic spheres. Adolph Eichmann set up agricultural training camps in Austria to prepare young Jews for Kibbutz life. He visited Palestine and conferred with Zionist leaders who confessed their true expansionist goals Think about it. Hitler could have just confiscated all the Jewish wealth. Instead he used the "Haavara Program" to help establish the State of Israel.

On Nov. 25, 1940, a boat carrying Jewish refugees from Nazi Europe, the "Patra," exploded and sank off the coast of Palestine killing 252 people.

The Zionist "Haganah" claimed the passengers committed suicide to protest British refusal to let them land. Years later, it admitted that rather than let the passengers go to Mauritius it blew up the vessel.

"Sometimes it is necessary to sacrifice the few in order to save the many," Moshe Sharett, a former Israeli Prime Minister said at memorial service in 1958.

Jack Bernstein in his book 'An American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel stated -

“The Ashkenazi Jews, who migrated to Israel from Germany, while sympathetic to Communism and support it, tend to favour the practises of Nazi-style fascism. During World War II in Germany these elite Zionist Ashkenazi Jews worked closely with Hitler’s Gestapo in persecuting the lower class German Jews and delivering them to concentration camps. Now living in Israel, these elite Zionist Jews, who were well trained in Nazi-style fascism and favour it, have imposed many facets of fascism on Israel.

To give the impression that Israel is a democracy, members of the Knesset (Israel’s Congress) are elected – but it’s an odd kind of election. This is where Israel’s so-called democracy stops. It doesn’t make any difference which party wins an election, the Likud or Labour Party, the elite Zionist Jews rule in a dictatorial manner – giving favours to the elite clique and brutally suppressing any dissent.

Concerning Nazism/Fascism please let me clear a point. Germans are an admirable people – I dare say even great. But in Germany, the general population were victims of the Nazis who through cunning and brutality gained power. [Just as I have stated throughout this work and what is happening now in this nation and around the world] .

In Germany, the average Jews were victims of the Zionist elite who worked hand in hand with the Nazis. Many of those same Zionist Jews, who, in Germany, had worked with the Nazis, came to Israel and joined hands with the Zionist /Communist Jews from Poland and Russia. It is the two faces of communism and Nazi-style fascism that rule Israel. Democracy is merely an illusion."

Words For Socrates To Conjure With...

2008-11-25T16:53:00.000-08:00

In no particular order and what I've used/considered/disputed:

"racist", "anti-racist", "Nazi","White", "Black", "money","relativity", "Christianity", "fascist","money", "inflation", "Holocaust" and "nationalisation" (especially with regard to bank "nationalisation" ! ) to mention just a few words that can mean many things to many people ... :-)

Marcus Aurelius expressed it well:

"Make for thyself a definition or description of the thing which is presented to thee, so as to see distinctly what kind of a thing it is, in its substance, in its nudity, in its complete entirety, and tell thyself its proper name, and the names of the things of which it has been compounded, and into which it will be resolved. For nothing is so productive of elevation of mind as to be able to examine methodically and truly every object which is presented to thee in life, and always to look at things so as to see at the same time what kind of universe this is, and what kind of use everything performs in it, and what value everything has with reference to the whole, and what with reference to man, who is a citizen of the highest city, of which all other cities are like families ; what each thing is, and of what it is composed, and how long it is the nature of this thing to endure."

I spent some time a few years ago reading many of Plato's dialogues where he describes the "adventures" of his teacher Socrates. Socrates goes around asking people what they mean about such and such a word. Some would therefore consider Socrates something of a pain the arse, but he was trying to establish a scientific method for making sure people were talking about the same thing.

The word philosopher means "lover of wisdom". The rival "gang" of the Philosophers that Socrates railed against were the "Sophists". These were the people who believed in the supremacy of developing the art of rhetoric and the like without essentially touching base with quaint ideas of truth etc These were the advertisers/politicians of the day. The ability to impress and get power was the important thing to them. Nothing changes.

The Sophists became very angry with Socrates when he tried to pin them down on their definitions. The Sophists appealed to the gallery with their words and presumably the ignorance of the majority. The Philosopher would stand toe to toe with the Sophist and say "What do you mean by that word ?" (The word "Sophist" of course has the same origin as "sophisticated". "Sophisticated" means complex and over time has even come to mean something good when originally it had more to do with hoodwinking people. )

I feel a strong affinity with Socrates, or at least the Socrates that Plato described. Socrates is a forerunner of many truth martyrs that have stood against the inertia of the “Sophist” political class and their conscious (evil) adoption of the masses’ ignorant beliefs in order to exercise power over them. People have been burnt at the stake for suggesting that distant stars may be suns that have planets with life on them. Galileo was threatened with torture should he not retract his belief that the earth was not the centre of the Solar System. Newton was mocked. So was Charles Darwin. Revisionists have had acid thrown in their faces and even been jailed ! Throughout all of this there have been a class of people who maintain their position in society by espousing what is wrongly believed by an uneducated mass, and yet they themselves, know to be false. At the same time, those who would bring enlightenment are “necessarily” persecuted. If this isn’t a characteristic of evil, I don’t know what is.

Socrates was one of the earliest recorded “thought criminals”. Eventually the Establishment of the day caught up with him. He was charged with:
1/ Corrupting the minds of the youth
2/ Refusing to recognise the gods acknowledges by the state.

He was sentenced to death, but words at his trial (according to Plato) have a resonance that every frustrated Nationalist and Truthseeker will appreciate:

"The difficulty, my friends, is not to avoid death, but to avoid unrighteousness for that runs faster than death. I am old and move slowly, and the slower runner has overtaken me, and my accusers are keen and quick, and the faster runner, who is unrighteousness, has overtaken them. And now I depart hence condemned by you to suffer the penalty of death, - they too go their ways condemned by the truth to suffer the penalty of villainy and wrong; and I must abide by my award - let them abide by theirs. I suppose that these things may be regarded as fated, - and I think that they are well.
And now, O men who have condemned me, I would fain you prophesy to you; for I am about to die, and in the hour of death men are gifted with prophetic power. And I prophesy to who are my murderers, that immediately after my departure punishment far heavier than you have inflicted on me will surely await you. Me you have killed because you wanted to escape the accuser, and not to give an account of your lives. But that will not be as you suppose: far otherwise. For I say They are about to slay Socrates because he has been their accuser: other accusers will rise up and denounce them more vehemently. That there will be more accusers of you than there are now; be accusers whom hitherto I have restrained: and as they are younger they will be more inconsiderate with you, and you will more offended at them. If you think that by killing men you can prevent some one from censuring your evil lives, you are mistaken; that is not a way of escape which is either possible or honourable; the easiest and the noblest way is not to be disabling others, but to be improving yourselves. This is the prophecy, which I utter before my departure to the judges who have condemned me. "

I think Socrates would if he were alive in the west today he would ask "What do you mean by bank 'nationalisation' ? "

Majority Whites to Minority Whites

2008-11-25T02:24:00.000-08:00

A South African White castigates out of touch liberal Europeans. Makes me think. As the number of White people in the West declines, will our quality increase ? Just perhaps, it was never about our numbers, our collective declining IQ and our manipulation by the banker owned media, and always about the quality,culture and resilience of a few who will always survive. The struggle for survival of a people is not limited by them becoming a voting minority. In fact based on the South African experience, the prospect of us becoming a minority in our own lands may raise the quality of those who are left by virtue of the qualities needed to survive and procreate in a hostile environment.

"My angry reply to an Arrogant European about the damage 'caring Whites' have done to Blacks in Africa...
Date Posted: Sunday 23-Nov-2008

[I was quite infuriated by a recent comment. You can view it here: http://www.africancrisis.co.za/Article.php?ID...Here was my reply. These Politically Correct Whites who are so proud of their "caring" should be shown clearly, the utter devastation that they have brought to Africa and especially the Blacks due to their so-called "caring". Jan]

I wrote:-

Hi Sojourner
I am completely sick and tired to the nth degree of being lectured to by arrogant, Politically Correct whites who imagine that their methods are actually working. Most of you people are too blind to see what is happening in your own countries and continent with regard to the way you deal with black people. None of your methods work.

You people imagine you're so clever, and yet, the many of you will be overrun and be dictated to by people dumber than you and numbering less than you.

At least we whites in Africa achieved our success and held our own against vastly superior odds. You people in Europe and America will, within 2 generations, be losing your countries to foreign Blacks, Muslims - and Latinos - of which there are said to be at least 30 million illegals already in America (according to Jeff Rense).

The complete failure of your Politically Correct policies can be seen in the hundreds of billions of dollars in Aid to Africa over the last 40 years which have solved nothing. Africa gets poorer and more disorganised by the day. I predict that Africa will see more war than it has ever known. And you keep watching South Africa and Zimbabwe and you will see more violence and suffering in 2009 than ever - among the very blacks you seem to think you understand and can help. Keep watching. Your methods, are not helping Africa and are not solving any problems.

I take it from your attack that you are a White Scandanavian - and quite an arrogant one at that? There are many issues here which need to be put into the correct context. I would love to know if you are a Scandanavian, because I think you Scandanavians shouldn't shoot your mouths off too arrogantly there. I think you people will be overrun with blacks in your own country. We actually had a writer from Sweden who would contribute stories to AfricanCrisis stating how blacks are moving into and taking over Sweden and Denmark. So where exactly do you live?

Since you seem quite ignorant about Africa and racial matters, let me explain a little something to you. And when I'm finished, you'll see how completely stupid you white people in Europe and America are and why it is that lesser peoples will overrun you and conquer you within a generation or two. For the Whites in America, there is only 30 years left before their country is lost.

Africa may have had 600 million people in it (its probably now closer to 800 million), and yet, at the height of white power, the total number of whites on the African continent never exceeded 6.5 million. 90% of Whites in Africa lived in South Africa.

In Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, a mere 250,000 white people lived in a country the size of France and ruled over 6 million blacks for 90 years. It took world sanctions, embargoes from America and Europe and a 14 year war sponsored by Russia and China to break our power. On the whole, I think we did pretty well given that our entire White population was less than that of a town in Europe.

In South Africa, at its height, there were 5.5 million whites in a country of about 40 million blacks. This was the only country in the history of Africa to be classified as a First World Nation.

My first point is that a very tiny proportion of whites controlled a vast continent and were completely outnumbered. While doing this, we built up this continent from nothing to thriving nations with, at times, 10% GDP growth. We did this with no UN funding, and no assistance from anyone. During our rule there was no starvation and the black population grew rapidly. Compare that to the rubbish kind of "caring" you Politcally Correct Whites are now achieving in Africa. Since you people "started caring" Blacks have been going down the drain faster than ever in history. Their countries have imploded, they have less food and starvation, disease and war has never been more rampant than now. Your rubbish kind of "caring" has left millions dead and dozens of countries ruined.

Thank God we do not have YOUR LEGACY on our conscience because it is thousands of times worse than any crimes we committed! At least we can show that in our time there was progress; tremendous GDP growth; PEACE (yes, there was more peace when we were around) and food was abundant. During our rule Africa exported massive amounts of every conceivable kind of food. But your "caring" has resulted in the biggest collapse of agriculture in the history of Africa.

Furthermore, there has been more war in Africa since we lost power than ever. And guess what, my arrogant, Politically Correct friend, Black on Black wars are increasing in number. Wait... give it some more time and you'll see Blacks killing each other from one end of the continent to the other.

Which brings me to another point: How many blacks did we Whites actually kill? Even your kind will admit that over 48 years in horrible Apartheid South Africa, no more than 20,000 blacks were killed. Of those 48 years, you should remember that Nelson Mandela declared a war against the White Govt which ran for 33 of the 48 years. Most of those blacks who "died under the horrors of Apartheid" actually died during Nelson Mandela's war against the Whites. You will find that hardly any blacks were killed prior to Nelson Mandela's massive campaign of terrorism which resulted in him going to prison. Go and study some history and get your facts straight before making wild accusations about our supposed crimes.

I suggest you take your nose and go and stick it into the business of other black African nations and then see how well things have been going where the Whites aren't around and where your nosey Govts are "caring". How about the million Blacks who died in Rwanda under the noses of "caring whites" who knew what was going on. How about the... how many is it now... 250,000 or is it more now... who've died in the Sudan in a genocide that rages right now while all you Whites are "caring" over there. And the million blacks who died in Angola's civil war, where the Americans were "caring" too?

So the Whites in South Africa killed 20,000 Blacks during 48 years of Apartheid, 33 of which were during a war that was declared by Nelson Mandela himself. And you then want to kick the Whites of South Africa to death over that. Isn't it completely hypocritical of you "caring whites" that when Robert Mugabe, in a year or two in the early 1980s decided to torture and murder black people in Zimbabwe, that you "caring whites" did absolutely bugger all? You said nothing. You did nothing. You lauded the bastard endlessly. You praised him to high heaven even as he was having his hideous 5th Brigade shoving bayonets up into women's private parts and throwing the dead bodies of men, women and children down mine shafts? You are willing to cause a furore, to write endless hate speech and to embargo and attack whites who over 48 years killed 20,000 blacks in a war but when Robert Mugabe murdered 30,000 blacks, you praised him endlessly and hypocritically glossed over everything!!

Since we lost power, all these black nations which were growing and could feed themselves collapsed to ever greater levels of poverty.

All in all, a handful of whites, with a total population of less than half that of Holland ran one of the largest areas of land on the planet. We did it among a people who were backward and uncivilised and we did it without any assistance. Not only that but we brought progress to both ourselves and to themselves in a way that has never been seen since. Not the entire Western world with hundreds of billions in "caring aid" could achieve a fraction of the success which we achieved among blacks who vastly outnumbered us.

At least we can say we were outnumbered 10 or 20 or 50 to one and we stood our ground and made progress. You on the other hand with your vast wealth and your massive numbers are instead made fools of by a couple of blacks and some Muslim ragheads!!

In Afghanistan and Iraq, we see countless billions, if not trillions of dollars being used, which is bankrupting the most powerful country in the world. I laugh. We whites in Africa fought longer and tougher wars than Iraq (See Angola). We fought in more difficult terrain, vastly outnumbered, operating on shoe-string budgets that in your world would hardly be enough to run a few battalions, and we kicked ass and survived.

Were it not for 600 million of you (Americans and Europeans) whites who care for nothing but your own wealth we might actually have won. If you did not sabotage our every move while giving succour and money to our enemies while slapping us with worse embargoes and sanctions than Saddam Hussein and Robert Mugabe will ever know, we would probably have remained in control to this very day.

The big difference between us and you is this:-
We were outnumbered 10 or 20 to one and we stood our ground and we might even have succeeded. You on the other hand, who outnumber the non-whites 10 or 20 to one, will end up losing your entire country. You cannot even control a bunch of Third Worlders who are stupid and lack technology. They scare you and you run with your cheque books to buy them off and pay them off because despite your power, you actually can't deal with them face to face and man to man. And the methods you employ are completely ineffective.

You people have become an embarrassment to our White ancestors. What a far cry we are from what we once were. On the History channel yesterday, I saw a documentary about how 7,000 Greeks stood at Thermopalae against an army, which they now estimate was as much as 300,000 strong. The Greeks, thousands of years ago, and the Western world today are completely different. Whereas our few ancestors, like Alexander the Great could conquer barbarians, you are now so completely useless that a few completely stupid, worthless, pathetic, lazy Third Worlders can come into your country and start taking your country right from under your feet.

You people are very weak, and these Blacks and Muslims who face you, secretly spit on you and despise you because even they can see how completely ineffective your methods are.

I think the Whites of Africa have a better chance of surviving as a cohesive group and in retaining their place in southern Africa than you people in Europe do. Don't mock us too much, because your children may be running to us to ask us how to survive, because clearly, your methods do not work and you have no conception of how to deal with Third World people at all and even less of an idea of how to survive among them, which is a skill that all of you arrogant Politically Correct Whites will need to learn sooner than you think!
Posted By: Jan
AfricanCrisis Webmaster

http://www.africancrisis.co.za/Article.php?ID=38721& "

Griffin. A Liar's Body Language

2008-11-24T06:27:00.000-08:00

Towards the end of the video Griffin is asked whether he leaked the members list himself. He momentarily looks down and closes his eyes. Classic signs of telling porkies.

Hitler - A Zionist Creation - Part One

2008-11-23T10:45:00.000-08:00

A fantastic essay by regular blog contributor, "Behind Blue Eyes"

"Before I start my critique I would like to state that the so-called Holocaust is a complete HOAX and has been used ever since to bleed Germany dry and as a justification for Zionist Israeli racism, genocide and atrocities etc.

"The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism." (Statement by Rabbi Felix Mendlesohn, Chicago Sentinel, October 8, 1942).

"World War II was a Zionist plot to make way for the foundation of the Jewish State in Palestine." (Joseph Burg, an anti-Zionist Jew).

Simon, after doing a lot of research into this area I have come to the conclusion that Hitler and The Nazi Party was a Zionist inspired set-up from day one.

The name itself gives the game away. Taken from this link -
http://www.somethingjewish.co.uk/judaism_guide/ashkenazi_jews/index.htm
'Ashkenazi Jews, also called Ashkenazim are Jews who are descendants of Jews from Germany, Poland, Austria and Eastern Europe.'

According to Wikipedia a Nasi was the highest-ranking member and president of the Sanhedrin and the Romans recognised the nasi as 'Patriarch of the Jews'.

The Treaty of Versailles was hijacked by Jewish international financiers to create the necessary economic, social, and political and conditions necessary for Hitler to exploit.

Lloyd George told the New York journal American of June 24th 1924:
“The international bankers dictated the Dawes reparations settlement. The protocol which was signed between the allies and associated powers and Germany is the triumph of the international financier. Agreement would never have been reached without the brusque and brutal intervention of the international bankers. They swept statesman, politicians, and journalists to one side, and issued their orders with the imperiousness of absolute Monarchs, who new there was no appeal from their ruthless decrees. The settlement is the joint ukase of King Dollar and King Sterling. The Dawes report was theirs. They inspired it and fashioned it. The Dawes report was fashioned by the Money Kings. The orders of German financiers [led by the Warburg Bank] to their political representatives were just as peremptory as those of allied bankers to their political representatives.”

Hitler was instructed by German Army Intelligence to spy on The German Workers Party. The head of German Army Intelligence was none other than Max Warburg brother of Paul Warburg, founder of The US Federal Reserve!!! The modus operandi of the Zionists has always been to infiltrate/and or set up groups and political organisations/parties of every description including anti-semitic:-

“It is essential that the sufferings of Jews. . . become worse. . . this will assist in realization of our plans. . .

I have an excellent idea. . . I shall induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. . .

The anti-Semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews.

The anti-Semites shall be our best friends.”
Theodor Herzl, Founder of Zionism in 1897.

"It is from us that the all engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our service persons of all opinions, of all doctrines, monarchists, demagogues, socialists, communists and utopian dreamers of every kind...striving to overthrow all established forms of order. All states are in torture... but we will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international Super government..."
Protocol 9

The Nazi party was set-up, financed and maintained by Jewish International Financiers. Montagu Norman, governor of the Rothschild-controlled Bank of England, and a close friend of Schacht.In fact they were so close that Schacht named his grandson after him. It was Norman who pressed for and supported the raising of the U.S. interest rates by the Federal Reserve, which was the final push that led to the Wall Street crash, the New Deal, and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Norman was the most influential central banker in the world at that time and his actions, in league with Wall Street, were crucial.

Once Hitler was safely elected, the attitude of the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve to Germany was transformed. Credit was offered to the Nazi regime and after the Nazis successfully invaded Czechoslovakia; Norman released £6 million of Czechoslovakian gold to Hitler, which was deposited in London. This was done with the agreement of the Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain.

On June 11th 1934, and again the following October, Norman and Schacht met in secret at Badenweiler in the Black Forest to arrange loans for Hitler and the Nazis. But who was behind Norman? His family almost turned the Bank of England into their personal property. One grandfather, George Warde Norman, was the governor from 1821-1872 and his other grandfather, Lord Collet, was governor from 1887-1889. Montagu Norman spent a period in the United States at the offices of the Rothschild-funded Brown Brothers (later Brown Brothers, Harriman) and was befriended by the family of W.A Delano, relatives of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the President of the United States at the same time that Norman was head of the Bank of England.

This all-powerful banker was actually a “yes man” for the Rothschild’s, and here again, we see the ploy at work. He was portrayed as anti-Jewish. For more information on this watch Banking With Hitler at -
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=YauM5dHLn1s

Alfred Rosenberg, an occultist with a Jewish, Estonian and French background made a copy of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion available to Hitler. Why would a man with a Jewish background hand to Hitler the very ammunition that would lead to the attempt by his regime at the destruction of a grouping of people we know as the Jews?

When you accept the proven involvement of Jewish bankers and their political representatives to have been very involved in the funding of the Nazis re- armament, you have only two possible answers:

Either Zionists are not Jews or the Zionists wanted a mass persecution of there own people.

Both these answers are true. Many Zionists are not Jewish. Those that were knew that to further the rise and creation of the Zionist State in Palestine, they required an irrefutable need. The gathering Nazi hatred and blame towards the Jewish people for the ills of the world which led to the mass persecution, gave the Zionist elite exactly that.

Ernst Hanfstaengl, a close friend of Franklin Roosevelt, was also a close associate of Hitler before the war, says he was warned by the Austrian writer, Rudolf Kommer that, “if any political party emerges with an Anti-Semitic programme directed by Jewish or half Jewish fanatics, we shall have to watch out”.

Hanfstaengl wrote that later, after experiencing the influence that Alfred Rosenberg had on Hitler, he began to realise what that remark really meant:

"I thought back to Rudolph Kommer’s remark about an Anti-Semitic programme directed by Jewish or half – Jewish fanatics – Rosenberg was distinctly Jewish in appearance, although he would have been the first to protest furiously if anyone had questioned his ancestry. Yet I used to see him most mornings sitting in a dingy café at the corner of Briennerstrasse and Augustenstrasse with a Hungarian Jew named Holoschi, who was one of his principle assistants. The man called himself Hollander in Germany and was another of these Jewish Anti-Semites…I suspected the Aryan background of many of the others, Strasser and Streicher looked Jewish to me as well as figures like Ley, Frank and even Goebbels, who would have difficulty in proving their pedigree.”

So the creation of hatred towards the Jewish race, then the grotesque treatment that followed Hitler’s decrees, was hyped to enormous proportions to justify the takeover of Palestine for a Jewish Homeland. No one used this method more than Lord Victor Rothschild in his House of Lords speeches urging support for a Jewish State in Palestine. You can see the play by the elite clearly here. To add further to this, Hitler’s book Mein Kampf, was ghost written by Major General Karl Haushofer, who acknowledged that a major source for the ‘ideas’ it expressed came from Halford J. MacKinder, a director of the elite’s London School of Economics.

In 1996, official German documents uncovered by an American student also proved that many of Hitler’s leading officers and thousands of his troops were of Jewish decent. You can now understand why Britain appeased Hitler. The elite had to make sure the re-armament of Germany went un-headed. Only when Hitler’s war machine was ready would the stance of Britain change.

For a lot more information read -

Hitler's Jewish Soldiers -
http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2007/04/150-000-jews-in-hitlers-army.html

The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler -
http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2007/06/final-solution-to-adolf-hitler.html

Adolf Hitler Founder of Israel -
http://sos-at.blogspot.com/2006/02/adolf-hitler-founder-of-israel.html

Nazi medal commemorating Zionist collaboration with Hitler -
http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2007/04/nazi-medal-commemorating-zionist.html

Nazis were Zionists -
http://sos-at.blogspot.com/2007/11/nazis-were-zionists.html

Was Hitler a Rothschild? -
http://geocities.com/cliff_shack/HitlersSecretGrandfather.html

Zionism and the Third Reich -
http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2007/05/zionism-and-third-reich.html
"

Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler

2008-11-22T17:49:00.000-08:00

Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler - Online book.

May be worth reading. Anthony Sutton's books seem to be out of print - that's a shame. Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. I get the impression that Hitler's passage from Saint to Sinner (as portrayed by the Western media at the time) had a lot to do with his rejection of the international bankers and his moving to a non debt based currency. As usual I invite criticism, clarification and contradiction on this. This specific transitional phase of (Saint to Sinner) is something I would very much like to learn about if anyone has any other information.

Henry Makow's essay Red Symphony describes how Hitler was promoted as a bulwark against Stalin. Stalin succeeded Lenin, but the bankers choice was Trotsky. A modern parallel in my humble opinion seems to be that Saddam Hussein who was used as counterweight to the Ayatollah. Saddam Hussein fell foul of Zog bankers when he sought to denominate his oil in Euros instead of dollars...It always come back to money...

BNP Leak - Work Of MI5

2008-11-22T10:30:00.000-08:00

Interesting that a mass circulation tabloid report MI5 involvement. Readers of this blog will know of the claims regarding Simon Darby actually being 5IMon Darby. The fact the State allowed the names of children to be published shows to what extent the people of this country are just regarded as cattle.

The leak has occurred not long after the "BNP approach UKIP for an electoral pact" non story plastered across BBC news:

"But a police informant who had infiltrated the party said it was the work of MI5.

The covert operative told us security chiefs ordered the leak to halt the party’s rise in power."

longer article here....

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/59328/Death-threats-sack-for-outed-BNP-supporters/

Incidentally. The Unite Against Reason crowd believe it was one of their lot who was the recipient of this information and subsequently published the list, and so, there appears to be a little falling out amongst themselves on this affair. Far be it from me to give advice to the soapaphobics, but they might consider that the person, who I won't dignify by mentioning by name, could well be on the State's payroll. For clearly this "leak" had to be trusted to someone who would do the "right thing".

Haringey Child Abuse, Jersey And Establishment Paedophiles

2008-11-19T12:17:00.000-08:00

Thanks for this Blue Eyes. I think there were also links between that Hamilton character who murdered all those children in Scotland and senior Labour party politicians, that has a hundred year news blackout attached to it. Anyone remember that ?

"Eileen Fairweather, in the Mail on Sunday, has linked Haringey to Islington and Jersey ('I have known about Jersey paedophiles for 15 years,' says award-winning journalist.)

The Haringey boy, from Labour-run Haringey in London, was tortured to death by a satanist.

On 16 November 2008, the Mail on Sunday tells us How a close male relative of Baby P is linked to a big paedophile ring.

This child-abuse ring operated in Labour-run Islington, the part of London where Tony Blair once lived.

Reportedly, the ring supplied boys to top people.

(This child abuse ring, reportedly, has links to the child abuse in Jersey, which in turn, reportedly, has links to the Dutroux affair and the security services)

The close male relative of Baby P reportedly recruited boys from children's homes in Islington for the child-abuse ring, according to a secret report seen by The Mail on Sunday.

In the early 1990s, the relative, as a boy, was put in a children's home, in Labour-run Islington, in London.

All 12 of the children's homes in Islington were being used by the child-abuse ring, which reportedly had links to top people.

This ring included three pimps called Alan, John and George.

Reportedly, the relative, then aged 13, was persuaded, by money, drugs and threats, to supply the pimps with young boys.

The relative tried to blow the whistle.

Reportedly, the relative told social workers the names of boys who were being ferried from the children's homes to various parts of London (Manor Park, Tottenham, Soho and Westminster) to ‘be buggered by old men’.

Reportedly, none of the men were put under surveillance or questioned."

more...
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2008/11/haringey-boys-link-to-child-abuse-rings.html

(Edit: Thanks for the Hamilton/Blair/Robertson reminder Kev. An important article. A must read

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/blair_protection.html )

BNP Membership False Flag OP ? - The Smoke Clears

2008-11-19T08:47:00.000-08:00

It turns out that the leaked membership list is older than I first reported. . Every man and his dog probably have a copy now. I suspect the September 2008 reference to the list was a honest mistake. It is also the case that John Walker is still within the "fold".

My belief for what's its worth is that it has been done with Gri££in's blessing. They were possibly trying to frame the December rebels by a database from the same time frame and using a tactical device that may save him a lot of money in court.

Darby/Griffin have constantly refused to publically acknowledge that 9/11 was an inside job, they have however, possibly learnt to use the same game play themselves. Will Gri££in have the chutzpah to blame the Muslims as well as the "December Rebels" for the leak ?

BNP Membership List Goes Online

2008-11-18T09:22:00.000-08:00

http://northwestnationalists.blogspot.com/2008/11/bnp-membership-list-2008-goes-online.html

There have been sufficient opportunities in the past for disgruntled BNP officials to do this, and there have been quite a few of those with access to the membership list. If anything the lack of this particular act up until now is testimony to the integrity of those didn't seek revenge on Gri££in/Darby by hurting rank and file BNP members.

By all accounts, the membership list is up to September 2008. The word is, that it's Ex BNP Treasurer John Walker who's responsible. (I don't think this is now the case see later blog)

Since I'm absolutely convinced of Darby' s MI5 credentials, the publication of the membership list won't tell the Establishment anything they don't know. There will be understandable concern amongst BNP members - but like the population as a whole who vote more for Big Brother then in General Elections - this might get them to think about their voting for Gri££in against Chris Jackson in the last leadership election !

National Debt Is Three Times Higher Than Government Claims

2008-11-17T18:02:00.000-08:00

I think we are going to hear more about these so called PFI schemes. Bremner , Bird and Fortune (Channel 4) have just put out a pretty informative programme on this subject, along with pensions, corruption etc etc It forms part of "The Silly Money" series.

Another programme to watch, again on Channel 4 is The Ascent Of Money

Here is an article from the Daily Mail. I don't suppose even the mainstream media can ignore some things. The Mail will try and spin the crisis as Labour's fault, but this has been a long time in the making and the other Establishment puppets, the Tories, are just as much to blame:

"Gordon Brown has been accused of covering up the true scale of Britain's national debt which research claims is three times higher than the Government admits.

A new study claims that public debt is a massive £1.3 trillion, equivalent to £53,000 for every household in the UK.

Read more...
• UK's burdensome tax regime pushing businesses abroad
• Four families in ten could be sucked into the death-duty trap

The figure is higher than Britain's Gross Domestic Product - meaning the nation's wealth would be outstripped by its debt.

The report for the respected Centre for Policy Studies think tank says the official Treasury figure of £487 billion wrongly excludes the cost of public sector pensions liabilities, the hidden costs of Labour's flagship Private Finance Initiative contracts and debts incurred by Network Rail.

When these are taken into account the total is £1,340 billion, which is 103.5 per cent of GDP.

The report will deepen concerns about the state of the public finances a week before Mr Brown's Pre-Budget Report.

It suggests the Mr Brown has already breached official rules dictating that public debt should not add up to more than 40 per cent of Britain's economy.

Authors Stephen Hammond, the Shadow Transport Minister, and Brooks Newmark, a Conservative member of the Treasury select committee, urged the Chancellor to come clean.

The MPs said: "The public has a right to know the true extent of the liabilities which future generations of taxpayers will have to meet.

"Action to control the debt that is being incurred for future generations cannot be taken without an honest assessment of its true extent and, in the Chancellor's words, by 'ensuring that fiscal decisions are fully transparent and accountable'."

According to the report, the extra costs include funding public sector pensions to the tune of £720 billion, with a further £90 billion earmarked for local government pensions.

Hidden costs of PFI, which the Government uses to deliver hospitals, schools and roads, are £25 billion, while Network Rail's debts are £18 billion.

Mr Brown is already under huge pressure to curb public spending or lift taxes in order to cut his borrowing.

Numbers released earlier this month suggested there is a growing risk he will breach deficit targets this year, despite stronger than expected economic growth.

Mr Newmark and Mr Hammond said their figure could be even higher because their estimate for gold-plated public sector pensions is conservative. The Government's own figure for liabilities is £460 billion, which is excluded from national debt figures.

But some studies say the bill could be as high as £1,025 billion.

The Government is also wildly understating the impact of PFI, under which private companies to raise the finance for public projects and to run them on the government's behalf. The firms are paid for their work over two decades or more.

But critics claim that the project is an elaborate way of keeping huge public spending commitments off the public books by claiming they belong to the private sector.

In addition, the debt of Network Rail, the publicly-owned operator of the country's rail infrastructure, should be officially recognised because it is guaranteed by the Government.

A Treasury spokesman said: "These are spurious calculations which do not meet the internationally-agreed standards used by the ONS to calculate the UK's actual debt position.

"The reality is that the UK not only has low levels of debt by historical standards but also compared to the rest of the G7."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-418774/National-debt-times-higher-Government-claims.html

A Definition of National Debt

Is it or Isn't It ? The Bank Of England's "Nationalisation" Status

2008-11-17T05:40:00.000-08:00

Nationalisation is a word to conjure with. My belief, as I've mentioned before is that the 1946 nationalisation was a pseudo nationalisation. If the Bank Of England is not controlled by the "people", then it is controlled by private individuals. Private individuals who can base economic policy and the BoE's regulatory function on what is good for them and not for the people as a whole.

The writer alleges the BoE was privatised after 1977. I believe it was already effectively privatised before, because it was never really nationalised in the first place. Never the less, it seems that 1977 marks a date from which we can agree to say the BoE is privately owned. There seems to be a tremendous amount of lack of transparency and fudge. Something is being hidden. Correspondence I have received back from the BoE and related quangos has always been polite, friendly and superficially helpful, but unwilling to name names.

This from a valued correspondent, with the link at the bottom to the forum from where it's from:

‘THE BANK OF ENGLAND

The Bank Of England’ was formed with a capital of £1.2 million, this capital was ‘loaned’ to the government in consideration of a monitory and banking monopoly over the Kingdom of William III, ergo The United Kingdom. The government of Clement Attlee nationalised The Bank of England in 1946, issuing Treasury Notes in the sum of £11,015,100. All the stock was owned by the British Government, although The Bank of England continued as a ‘Royal Charter Company’ with the absolute protection of confidentiality and security afforded by a Royal Charter and The Official Secrets Acts.

Obviously the nationalisation was not welcomed by it’s share holders or bankers of the day. Wilson’s’ abrupt resignation as Prime Minister in April 1976 and the new government of James Callaghan had virtually no majority, ‘UK Ltd’ was vulnerable and effectively bankrupt, with double digit annual inflation, 70% over 3 years, incessant strikes, the £ Sterling frequently suspended on international exchange markets, virtual parity with the US$, the ideal time for the share holders to strike back and re-take the Bank of England.

SO is this WHY, on the 6th April 1977 the Bank of England formed the BANK OF ENGLAND NOMINEES LIMITED, (BOEN), a wholly owned subsidiary private limited company, no: 1307478, with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued and its Memorandum & Articles of Association’s Objectives are;-

“To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them....”

MELANIE JOHNSON MP, Minister for the Treasury, informed me that “BOEN is a wholly owned subsidiary of BOE, which was granted an exemption by the Minister of State for Trade from the disclosure requirements under Section 27(9) of the Companies Act 1976 , because;

“it was considered undesirable that the disclosure requirements should apply to certain categories of shareholders”.

As we have seen above The Bank of England with its Royal Charter Status and Official Secrets Act, has more confidentiality and security than the MoD and is even immune from questions being asked in the House of Commons. So why form a wholly owned ‘NOMINEE’ COMPANY which in 23 years HAS NEVER TRADED and only lodges ‘Short Form’ un-audited accounts ?

I allege that The Bank of England was sometime after 1977 effectively ‘Privatised’, it’s shares being held in BOEN, thereby making a ‘closed loop’ , i.e. although BOEN is a wholly owned subsidiary of BOE, BOEN has effective control of BOE through the said shares owned by the secret share holders. I am advised that only 50% of the shares were sold, but they have ALL the voting rights ! Share holders appoint directors, look who makes up the ‘Court’ of Directors of The Bank of England, bringing one to the only conclusion that the Bank of England is owned covertly, if not by the banks, then by a higher banking entity which has the interests of the banks at heart, which justifies the rampant and systemic fraud perpetrated upon their customers with arrogance and impunity.

It is said to be the Duty of every Chief Constable to enforce the Law but there is no record of Regina v High St Bank, except, The Queen -v- Barclays Bank Plc, ex-party OWEN ~ which I brought. Police funding stops them from being effective against organised, national, international crime, perpetrated by banks.

In 1997, in the foot steps of Three Rivers District Council, who won their action against the Bank of England for failing to control BCCI, several of us who were casualties of banks made formal complaints against the BOE for not enforcing control over our respective high street banks, but contrary to the Bank’s own Statement of Principles and Banking Acts we were rejected on the grounds that the BOE does not intervene between bank and customer. Within months the BOE complaints staff and department had been transferred to Canary Wharf under the guise of the Financial Services Agency who are unable to act on complaints emanating prior to their formation."

http://forumnews.wordpress.com/about/bank-of-england-nominees/

....................

Bank Of England Directors and other are found here:
http://nationalisttruth1.blogspot.com/2008/10/bank-of-england-directors.html

I haven't looked too closely yet. Would be a useful link to a researcher coming to this blog. A cursory glance show big wigs from the High St banks are well represented, which the above writer alludes to - clearly a conflict of interest.

ALSO. Thanks again to those who posted on the BoE interest rate article. I will bring those comments together in the next week or so.

House Repossessions

2008-11-15T11:26:00.000-08:00

This was in the comments sections of NorthWestNationalists to do with an article about House Repossessions

"They cannot repossess your house unless you allow them to. DO NOT listen to those who may try to "turf you out" they tell lies. DO NOT let them "turf you out" if they physically touch you or anyone else in your house it is Assualt, they cannot physically break in if your house is secured and someone is in residence in the house.The law is on your side. DO YOUR RESEARCH..."

Can anyone verify this ? If they can, it's a very very important piece of information for the right people. (I've advocated a national mortgage repayments strike, although the will to collective action in our country is a little wanting...)

Heretics , Hoaxes , Haiti and Scientific Objectivity

2008-11-09T13:05:00.000-08:00

Heretics , Hoaxes , Haiti and Scientific Objectivity

The excellent Heretical.com contains a couple of great articles critiquing Einstein's Special Relativity. The articles are based on Herbert Dingle's "Science At The Crossroads". These article inspired me to get a copy of the book. My edition is 1972. Hebert Dingle's career was very distinguished. In 1922, some fifty years earlier he wrote an exposition of Einstein's 1905 theory. During a fifty year academic career he realised there was a very simple flaw in the theory. The book explains the flaw and also the resistance of the Establishment to even debating the issue .

The flaw is best illustrated with the famous twin paradox, which goes likes this: If I have a twin brother who gets on a spaceship and flies at near light velocities, when he returns, I will have aged more than him. This is the famous "moving clock move slower" observation of relativity. Special Relativity is based on two initial premises:
The speed of light is always measured to be the same no matter how fast or slow we are moving ourselves and the laws of physics are observed to be the same, no matter what the frame of reference is.

The problem is with the second premise (and implicitly the second - but more on that another time) . Dingle jokes that when relativity was first attracting attention he saw a cartoon where a passenger is saying to the conductor : "At what time does Manchester arrive at this train please ? " :-) but this is what relativity actually means. Movement according to Einstein is relative. So. Why does my spaceship twin age less than me , since I on planet earth could be deemed to have been the one moving !!!! Dingles than advances the nature of the real paradox of the Twin Paradox. It implies that both clocks, if consistent with relativity should be running both slower and faster than the other one !!!

I studied relativity myself in the final year of my degree many years ago. My maths was a little pedestrian at best but I was philosophically on the ball. I remember asking my otherwise excellent Oxbridge educated maths lecturer about what I now know as Dingle's paradox. She didn't know. Dingle made the point that science had in many ways become the slave of mathematics rather than its master.

Relativity is a little fearsome for many to understand and flaws in it hardly get a mention in the mainstream. Einstein was certainly a very clever man with a good imagination but I leave others to explain why his name is remembered above many others of equal or in some cases, superior abilities Eg Tesla and another Herbert, Herbert Ives, a very accomplished American engineer physicist who developed an alternative theory to Einstein's that recovered the notion of Absolute space and time, with varying light speed referenced to an Absolute frame of reference, and I hope to comment more on this in the future.

We live in a time when so many things are not disclosed and hidden from view. In no particular
order: Possible nutritional reasons for most cancers, needless uses of fluoride in the water, false flag ops like 9/11, the real insubstantial nature of political figures, the moon landing hoax, the deliberate holding back of cheap energy sources, the obfuscation of the real nature of banks, the "Holocaust" hoax, the alien UFO hoax to disguise German WWII electrogravimetric craft and their continued development , the refusal by the Establishment to acknowledge the reality of the Bell Curve and the intelligence of particular groups….The list could go on.

The cowardice of the so called British academic elites in commenting on 9/11 for example does make me angry. Clearly there are changes for the best that can only be made when good men and women are prepared to stand up for the truth rather than sit back and accept what is often a religious adoption of plainly wrong, outdated and politically correct notions.When you ignore objectivity and intelligence you get the human tragedy we hear about in Haiti . I'm thinking of those unfortunate people killed when the school building collapsed and closer to home, for example the decline of the NHS as highlighted by NorthWestNationalists

It seems to me that the whole of the Western world is being overtaken by another Dark Age. Clearly there are forces at work which want to monopolise knowledge, resources and technology to preserve their current grip . Surely though, this lack of objectivity that is allowed to be preserved by the Rothschilds, Rockerfellers , Windsors and the rest, must some day have an impact on them as individuals ?

We need a return to objectivity.

Here is an article on the gagging of David Bellamy who won't go along with the Establishment BS on "Global Warming", or their fall back position of "Climate Change", as they call it now. Of course it's all about money.

We need a civilisation based on Classical European thought not the Protocols of Zion. A civilisation based on truth and real human progress. Not one based on robbing Peter to pay Paul and preserving a parisitical lying sexually deviant elite.

"BBC SHUNNED ME FOR DENYING CLIMATE CHANGE

FOR YEARS David Bellamy was one of the best known faces on TV.

A respected botanist and the author of 35 books, he had presented around 400 programmes over the years and was appreciated by audiences for his boundless enthusiasm.

Yet for more than 10 years he has been out of the limelight, shunned by bosses at the BBC where he made his name, as well as fellow scientists and environmentalists.

His crime? Bellamy says he doesn’t believe in man-made global warming.

Here he reveals why – and the price he has paid for not toeing the orthodox line on climate change.

When I first stuck my head above the parapet to say I didn’t believe what we were being told about global warming I had no idea what the consequences would be.

I am a scientist and I have to follow the directions of science but when I see that the truth is being covered up I have to voice my opinions.

According to official data, in every year since 1998 world temperatures have been getting colder, and in 2002 Arctic ice actually increased. Why, then, do we not hear about that?

The sad fact is that since I said I didn’t believe human beings caused global warming I’ve not been allowed to make a TV programme.

My absence has been noticed, because wherever I go I meet people who say: “I grew up with you on the television, where are you now?”

It was in 1996 that I criticised wind farms while appearing on Blue Peter and I also had an article published in which I described global warming as poppycock.

The truth is, I didn’t think wind farms were an effective means of alternative energy so I said so. Back then, at the BBC you had to toe the line and I wasn’t doing that.

At that point I was still making loads of television programmes and I was enjoying it greatly. Then I suddenly found I was sending in ideas for TV shows and they weren’t getting taken up. I’ve asked around about why I’ve been ignored but I found that people didn’t get back to me.

CAMPAIGNER: Bellamy says we must stop destroying tropical rainforests

At the beginning of this year there was a BBC show with four experts saying: “This is going to be the end of all the ice in the Arctic,” and hypothesising that it was going to be the hottest summer ever. Was it hell! It was very cold and very wet and now we’ve seen evidence that the glaciers in Alaska have started growing rapidly – and they’ve not grown for a long time.

I’ve seen evidence, which I believe, that says there has not been a rise in global temperature since 1998, despite the increase in carbon dioxide being pumped into the atmosphere. This makes me think the global warmers are telling lies – carbon dioxide is not the driver.

The idiot fringe have accused me of being like a Holocaust denier, which is ludicrous. Climate change is all about cycles, it’s a natural thing and has always happened. When the Romans lived in Britain they were growing very good red grapes and making wine on the borders of Scotland. It was evidently a lot warmer.

If you were sitting next to me 10,000 years ago we’d be under ice. So thank God for global warming for ending that ice age; we wouldn’t be here otherwise.

People such as former American Vice-President Al Gore say that millions of us will die because of global warming – which I think is a pretty stupid thing to say if you’ve got no proof.

And my opinion is that there is absolutely no proof that carbon dioxide is anything to do with any impending catastrophe. The science has, quite simply, gone awry. In fact, it’s not even science any more, it’s anti-science.

There’s no proof, it’s just projections and if you look at the models people such as Gore use, you can see they cherry pick the ones that support their beliefs.

To date, the way the so-called Greens and the BBC, the Royal Society and even our political parties have handled this smacks of McCarthyism at its worst.

Global warming is part of a natural cycle and there’s nothing we can actually do to stop these cycles. The world is now facing spending a vast amount of money in tax to try to solve a problem that doesn’t actually exist.

And how were we convinced that this problem exists, even though all the evidence from measurements goes against the fact? God knows. Yes, the lakes in Africa are drying up. But that’s not global warming. They’re drying up for the very simple reason that most of them have dams around them.

So the water that used to be used by local people is now used in the production of cut flowers and vegetables for the supermarkets of Europe.

One of Al Gore’s biggest clangers was saying that the Aral Sea in Uzbekistan was drying up because of global warming. Well, everyone knows, because it was all over the news 20 years ago, that the Russians were growing cotton there at the time and that for every ton of cotton you produce you use a vast amount of water.

The thing that annoys me most is that there are genuine environmental problems that desperately require attention. I’m still an environmentalist, I’m still a Green and I’m still campaigning to stop the destruction of the biodiversity of the world. But money will be wasted on trying to solve this global warming “problem” that I would much rather was used for looking after the people of the world.

Being ignored by the likes of the BBC does not really bother me, not when there are much bigger problems at stake.
I might not be on TV any more but I still go around the world campaigning about these important issues. For example, we must stop the destruction of tropical rainforests, something I’ve been saying for 35 years.

Mother nature will balance things out but not if we interfere by destroying rainforests and overfishing the seas. That is where the real environmental catastrophe could occur."

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/69623

[Edit A promising link describing evidence pointing to an Absolute Frame of Reference
http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:GQ5ltzdjgLMJ:www.physicsfoundations.org/PIRT_XI/papers/CAREY%2520PAPER%25202008.doc+dingle+evidence+for+absolute+frame+of+reference&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=7&gl=uk ]

ZIONISTS SUBJUGATE OUR NATIONS BY CONTROLLING OUR POLITICAL PARTIES

2008-11-08T09:15:00.000-08:00

"ZIONISTS SUBJUGATE OUR NATIONS

BY CONTROLLING OUR POLITICAL PARTIES

By Christopher Bollyn

Politicians in the United States and Britain are made to pass under the yoke of the Zionist masters who control our leading political parties. By forcing our political leaders to accept the Zionist yoke our nations become subjugated and the pro-Israel agenda is forced upon the entire population. Zionist control of Britain's prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown is explained in this article, "How Mossad Controls our Political Parties."

As the $700 billion bail-out of Zionist fraudsters was being debated in the U.S. Congress a supporter wrote to me saying, "I think we are out of time. If only more good people knew what you know!" I would say that it's not so much what I know, but rather my perspective and the directions I pursue in my investigations that are not found in the media. Because my anti-Zionist perspective is taboo, my views are censored by the Zionist-controlled media. Hence, most people are simply unaware of my research.

Having spent several years in Israel and the Middle East and having studied the history of Zionism (i.e. Jewish nationalism), I know something about the many crimes committed by Zionists during the past century. From this perspective I approach the evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the major crimes of our time, such as 9-11. My investigations have uncovered a great deal of evidence of Israeli involvement in the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 and other crimes.

For journalists working in the controlled media pursuing such investigations would be "career suicide" as many learned after 9-11. I have also paid a very high price for my research and writing. I learned that Jewish Zionists control even small so-called nationalist newspapers. Most journalists, lawyers, and politicians are primarily interested in advancing their own careers and learn early on to accept the yoke of their Zionist masters -- or sacrifice their careers. Ambitious people put their self interest first and agree to go along with lies and corruption rather than stand up for the truth. I've seen it many times.

I am not like that. During the past 30 years, I have witnessed first-hand the extremely brutal Israeli occupation of Palestine and seen how Zionists operate to subjugate entire nations. My years in Palestine/Israel were my political awakening. Zionist control of the mass media and "Holocaust" propaganda serve to protect and promote their criminal agenda. I have watched how the people of America and Europe are deceived and forced to bear the yoke of the ruthless Zionists who control their political systems and media. Thousands of young Americans and Europeans have been maimed or lost their lives in fraudulent wars for Israel in Middle Eastern nations they know nothing about. Americans have become mercenaries of Zionism.

As an American, I can't support either presidential candidate because both are clearly Zionist puppets who espouse positions that I am strongly opposed to. American voters aren't even given a real choice about important things – like the ongoing wars in the Middle East, for example. Both candidates eagerly support the Zionist "War on Terror" and both lobbied hard for the $700 billion "bail-out" to be passed.

I could only support a true anti-war candidate who promised a proper investigation of 9-11 and who supported investing in American infrastructure, such as providing comfortable and efficient passenger trains between our cities. Why are we bailing out investment bankers with taxpayers' money while our cities and infrastructure are crumbling?

Unfortunately, both presidential candidates are pro-war and pro-Israel. These are the only candidates we have to choose from because both parties in the United States are political machines financed and run by Zionists. Third parties, such as the erstwhile Reform Party, are likewise controlled -- and run off the tracks. Zionist control of our political parties compels candidates from both parties to support Zionism, an utterly racist and un-American ideology based on a false and dangerous notion of Jewish supremacy. What kind of patriotic American could support that nonsense?

NO PARTIAL SOCIETY

"It is therefore important, if the general will is to be properly ascertained, that there should be no partial society within the state, and that each citizen should decide according to his own opinion," Rousseau wrote in The Social Contract. "When one of the associations, is big enough to triumph over all the others, the outcome is no longer the sum total of small differences, but a single difference, then there is no longer any general will, and the opinion that prevails is only a particular opinion."

The "partial society" that triumphs over all the others in American politics today is Zionism -- no other. In the United States, the pro-Israeli position is the only "opinion that prevails" in academia, the mass media, and the political parties with absolutely no consideration for the expense, injustice, and violence it causes. American support for Zionism has clearly been extremely detrimental for the United States of America, yet the support continues, without question. How does this happen?

MOSSAD SPIED ON HAIDER

Israel and the international Zionists control the political parties and news outlets in Europe as well, as the recent death of Austria's Jörg Haider reveals. Oddly, Haider, the leader of Austria's Freedom Party, allowed Peter Sichrovsky, a Jew, to serve as "secretary-general" of his supposedly anti-Zionist party. In 2005, the Times (UK) reported that Sichrovsky, the managing director of the party, had served as a spy for Israel's Mossad for five years. Three years later, after his party won parliamentary elections, Haider was suddenly killed in a very suspicious car accident.

“I wanted to help Israel and certainly did not do anything wrong,” Sichrovsky said. “It’s true, though, that I co-operated with Mossad until my withdrawal from politics in 2002.”

Sichrovsky admitted that he had spied for Mossad, a foreign intelligence agency, because he "wanted to help Israel." At the same time he maintained that he did nothing wrong. This is exactly how many Jews feel about supporting Israel, even when their actions involve breaking the laws of the nations they reside in.

Facing a criminal investigation and charges of spying for a foreign power, Sichrovsky quickly fled to the United States where he began a new career as "a businessman concerned with military co-operation between Israel and China." Sichrovsky's career with Mossad evidently continued after he left Austria.

If Mossad infiltrates "third party" movements in small nations like Austria, imagine what they do to control the two political parties in the United States. How much control does Israeli intelligence have over the major political parties in Britain and the United States? Let's look at the most obvious connections.

MOSSAD CONTROLS BRITAIN

The evidence indicates that Israeli intelligence has near complete control of the leading political parties in Britain and the United States. While the Zionist political controllers in London and Washington are well known to the owners of the mass media, discussion of the subject of Zionist or Israeli control of the parties is censored in the media outlets they control. This censorship illustrates how Zionist control of the media serves to deceive the people and cause extreme harm to the nations.

Specific examples of the current pro-Israel bias in the mass media would include the media's unquestioning support of the 9-11 cover-up, the costly and disastrous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the trillion dollar "bail-out." The complete lack of transparency in U.S. elections and discussion of the secretive private companies that run our elections are also censored subjects.

The utterly fraudulent Zionist construct called the "War on Terror" and the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have all been designed and forced onto the American and British nations by Zionists who control the political systems of London, New York, and Washington.

In Britain, the two political leaders who have promoted and supported the Zionist agenda and wars of aggression are Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. Their Zionist paymasters and handlers are not hard to discern, although they are never discussed in the media in such terms.

"LORD CASHPOINT"

Michael Abraham Levy, or "Lord Levy," was known as "Lord Cashpoint" (Can it be any more obvious?) when he was the leading fundraiser for the Labour Party from 1994 to 2007. Described as "a long-standing friend of Tony Blair," Levy served as Blair's special envoy to the Middle East from 1998 until 2007, when he was replaced by Gordon Brown's appointee, Michael Williams.

Levy's son, Daniel, is an Israeli citizen (immigrated 1991) who has held high-level positions in Israeli governments since 1995. While his father was bankrolling and managing Tony Blair, the younger Levy was a member of the Israeli negotiating team to the "Oslo 2" agreement during the summer of 1995 under Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. He was also a member of the Israeli delegation to the Palestinian summit at Taba in January 2001.

The younger Levy also served as senior policy adviser to former Israeli Minister of Justice, Yossi Beilin, from March 2000 to March 2001. Under Ehud Barak, Levy served as the prime minister's special adviser and head of the Jerusalem Affairs unit. The Levy link was obviously the connection that gave Israeli intelligence control over the head of the British government - Tony Blair.

"WE HAVE TO DO IRAQ"

Before the Anglo-American occupation of Iraq turned sour, Blair was fond of recalling what he, the first foreign leader to meet George W. Bush, told the newly installed president when they met in early 2001. "We have to do Iraq," is the first thing Blair told Bush, according to his own statements.

"We have to do Iraq," is the first thing Tony Blair told Bush when they met in February 2001.

Only by understanding that Blair and his New Labour party were financed and controlled by Israeli interests can one understand how Blair was manipulated to support such a reckless and criminal scheme. Similar Zionist forces were at work on Bush.

When Tony Blair and his Zionist handler "Lord Cashpoint" fell from power in June 2007, Gordon Brown, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, assumed the office of prime minister, upon the approval of Queen Elizabeth II -- but of course. Prior to becoming prime minister, Brown had served 10 years as Chancellor of the Exchequer, the minister responsible for economic and financial matters in Britain.

Prime Minister Brown, in turn, is bankrolled and controlled by Lord Ronald Cohen, who has replaced the beleaguered and disgraced Lord Levy. The Egyptian-born Cohen is described as "Sir Ronald Cohen, the daddy of England’s private equity industry and a bosom buddy of Prime Minister Gordon Brown."

In the British press Cohen is portrayed as a wealthy Jewish supporter of Brown and New Labour. Cohen's third wife, the Los Angeles-born Sharon Harel-Cohen, is usually described as a film producer whose father, Yossi Harel, commanded the Jewish refugee ship that became known as Exodus in 1947. Her Israeli nationality is seldom discussed.

What the controlled media doesn't tell us about Sharon Harel-Cohen is that she is an Israeli-American whose father was one of the founding chiefs of the Mossad and Israeli military intelligence until his death in April 2008. This means the daughter of one of the founders of Israeli intelligence is part of the team controlling the British prime minister. This is how Mossad has controlled the political leadership of Britain since the 1990s and taken the United States and Britain into two costly and disastrous wars in the Middle East.

Sharon Ruth Harel was born in Los Angeles on March 6, 1952. Her mother, a "Julie Berez" married Mossad officer Joseph Hamburger (a.k.a. Yossi Harel) in 1950 while he was stationed in Los Angeles. Harel was, most likely, engaged in the illegal procurement of weapons, ships, planes, and military technology for the Israeli military. The reports that Harel, one of the highest Mossad agents, was studying at UCLA or M.I.T. are neither substantiated nor credible; this was only his cover. Harel also had two sons, whose names are not known to the author.

(Whether Boaz and Ezra Harel, the two Israeli brothers who ran ICTS, the Mossad-run Israeli airport "security" company involved in the 9-11 attacks, are related to Yossi Harel is an open question I am investigating.)

The Mossad ("agency") actually came into existence in the 1940s as the clandestine agency known as Ha'Mossad Le'Aliya Bet, the secret Zionist agency engaged in bringing Jewish refugees to British-occupied Palestine to swell the Jewish population prior to creating the "Jewish state." In 1946, Joseph Hamburger was sent on a secret mission to provide Mossad agents in Greece with gold to bribe European governments to facilitate the transit of Jews to Palestine, which was then illegal. Some Mossad tactics have not changed at all during the past 60 years -- they still buy politicians with gold.

Joe Hamburger (a.k.a. Yossi Harel) commanded four refugee ships and sailed to Israel with an estimated 25,000 immigrants during the period of the British Mandate. U.S. immigration records indicate that Mr. Hamburger used both his real name, Hamburger, and his Israeli name, Harel, during the 1950s, which is typical of Mossad agents.

Yossi Harel was a lifelong chief of Israeli intelligence.

His 2008 obituaries say that "Yosef" Hamburger was born, with a twin brother, in Jerusalem, British-occupied Palestine, in 1918. At 15, he joined Haganah, the Zionist militia/terrorist group. Five years later he joined the Special Night Squad, an anti-Palestinian terrorist unit. In 1941, Harel joined the Palmach, the "strike force" of the Haganah before transferring to the Palyam, its naval unit.

During the 1948 Zionist war to conquer Palestine, Harel served as the liaison officer to the army’s chief of staff, Yaakov Dori, and played an important role in co-ordinating the Zionist campaign. He was also the personal body guard for Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann.

In 1954, Moshe Dayan, chief of staff of the Israeli Defense Forces, called Harel back to Israel to head Unit 131, a secret group that had agents in Arab countries. Harel's immediate task was to cover up the Lavon Affair, the Israeli false-flag terrorism plot designed to turn Britain and the United States against Egypt. David Ben-Gurion, the first Israeli prime minister, assigned Harel to rebuild military intelligence from the ground up. Ben-Gurion, Dayan, and Shimon Peres were actually part of the group that supported the use of false-flag terrorism, such as the Lavon bombings, to achieve their goals. Given this context, Harel must have seen eye-to-eye with Ben-Gurion about deploying Israeli agents in foreign nations. Shiploads of Israelis were sent on missions to America and Europe in the 1950s, often disguised as students.

Harel went on to pursue a successful business career, the Telegraph reported, "which served as a cover for his work for Israeli intelligence."

Like the Democrat "turncoat" Lewis M. Eisenberg, the current head of finance for the Republican National Committee, Cohen changed political parties in order to bankroll the Labour Party of Tony Blair. Cohen was a candidate in the Liberal party in the 1970s and only converted to Blair's New Labour in 1996. Since then he has reportedly given Labour an estimated $5 million and bankrolled Gordon Brown's career.

At their home in London the Cohens "give lavish parties for the likes of the Rothschilds, the Rausing billionaires and Cohen’s old mentor Sir Clive Sinclair." At their home in New York they entertain "their friends the Clintons." And then there is their villa at Mougins, near Cannes.

"Cohen moved into Brown’s orbit in 2000, when the chancellor appointed him chairman of a Treasury fund set up to encourage investment in deprived areas of the country. The next year he was rewarded with a knighthood," according to the Times 2005 profile entitled, "Sir Ronald Cohen: Midas with a mission - to make Gordon king."

Cohen began to replace Levy as Britain's liaison in the Middle East. In 2004, along with Blair and Brown, Cohen met Ehud Olmert, deputy to Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon.

As Brown replaced Blair, Cohen, the multimillionaire venture capitalist, replaced Levy as chief fundraiser for the ruling Labour party. About his connections to Israel, Cohen told the Times: "If you look at my history: born in Egypt, a refugee, married to the daughter of the commander of the Exodus who's an Israeli, there's an obvious connection between me and the region."

Obvious, perhaps, but definitely not discussed in the media.

Cohen, who is called the prime minister's 'private banker', "clearly has influence over Gordon Brown," the Jewish Chronicle wrote in their 2007 interview: "So what exactly is his relationship with Brown? There is a seven-second pause. 'I would classify myself as a friend of the Prime Minister, just as I was a friend of Tony Blair,' he says carefully."

In 2006, Cohen "started to take over the role of government emissary from Lord Levy by meeting Israeli leaders, including the prime minister, Ehud Olmert," the Guardian reported."

http://www.bollyn.info/home/articles/euhispol/how-zionists-control-britain/

Passing On The BoE Rate Cuts - I don't Understand

2008-11-07T05:45:00.001-08:00

Apparently the Bank Of England has cut rates. I want to think aloud on this with what I know or think I know. My education is incomplete. I invite comment, contradiction or God forbid, agreement :-)

The BoE lends money to the High St banks. They then lend it to their customers. The banks can lend a multiple of the amount they borrowed from the BoE. BUT apparently when banks borrow, they, or so I'm told, borrow from other banks most of the time as opposed from the BoE. So we get the so called interbank lending rate.

Other than the interbank lending rate there are the BoE own rate, the rate that banks offer to customers and the rate that savers get.

I think I understand the relationship between someone borrowing for a car loan say and someone saving a bit at the end of the month in a savings account. The car loan borrower pays more interest to the bank than the bank pays interest to the saver with the same amount as the car loan borrower still owes. I used to think that a bank's profit came from the sum total of these lending/saving differentials. Does the profit come solely from this or more from the fact that the High St bank can lend a multiple of its deposits to borrowers ? ... as I say,just thinking aloud...

Now. I don't' understand the fact that banks "need" to borrow from each other. I accept that this is what happens but don't know why. Why can't they borrow from the BoE without the need to borrow from each other ?

Passing on the BoE rate cut. There has been talk of why the High St banks aren't passing the rate cut on to the customers. Incidentally if banks are in competition with each other and adjust their rates to be competitive, why do they "help" each other by lending to each other ? Perhaps a naive question - but I'm sure I'm not the only one with such thoughts.

Thoughts please ?

So. What Are Obama's (And McCain's) "Strings" ?

2008-11-06T09:00:00.000-08:00

"Give me a place to stand on and I can move the Earth" - Archimedes

" The people chosen by us to act as rulers of a nation will not be those trained in the art of leadership. Instead we’ll select them based on their capacity to take orders. They’ll be puppets under the control of smart men who will be their advisers: specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world." - Protocol #2 – Economic Wars

"There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again." - George Bush

"I wonder if one day that, you'll say that, you care If you say you love me madly, I'll gladly, be there Like a puppet on a string" - Sandie Shaw

As usual I highlight the significant passages in red:

"Senator McCain has been a 'player' going back to his lying performance as a Viet Nam War hero, where he was never tortured, but treated like a prince for cooperating with his captors.

I just watched a 90-minute video yesterday, by the way, where Edwin H. Crosby III, a true Viet Nam hero and veteran, explains how veterans benefit claims have been stolen by the U.S. government to the tune of $70 Billion dollars, through a scam those in the know can identify as "DD214-SPN", while the soldiers themselves have been purposefully blacklisted from jobs, loans, and "the American Dream", in order to sideline and disempower them. The same thing is going to happen to veterans coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan, aside from their contamination from Depleted Uranium - they will spend years waiting for payments that somehow get delayed. Their original documents will be shredded by the Veterans Administration 'by mistake', but really in order to prevent the revelation that all that money has been paid out to bogus names, to finance yet more covert operations.

McCain has known about this for 25 years.

McCain, then in the Navy, before he ran for Congress, was one of three men in a room with Mr. Crosby in Washington. McCain was there because his future role was already chosen for him, people. The other man was his old friend Joe Biden. This was in 1983. They personally heard Mr. Crosby's story and took documentation from him. Mr. Crosby never heard from them again. But Crosby, with very limited funds for lawyers (and in a society where lawyers don't want to get involved fighting the government even if you do have the money) -- well, Crosby is still trying to go through the courts to break this fraud wide open, and he's been doing it for 30 years now. He just isn't a quitter. Now he has proof that the government crime against the veterans fits the legal definition of genocide. Genocide. Genocide.

Is it just greed for ripping off money? Or is it more than that? Does it fit in somewhere with how government, and chemtrail pilots, and flouridated-water pushers, and big pharma, and irradiated-food packagers, and wifi music & cellphones, and judges-who-belong-in-jail, and genetically-modified everything - how they are all 'killing us softly with their song'?

McCain and Biden both know where all the bodies are buried. They have both been keeping their mouths shut to play the game for decades. They both know 9-11 was an inside job. They both know a government conspiracy killed: John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, John Kennedy, Jr., etc.

This election was a phony. McCain never attacked Obama with the one story that would have destroyed him. McCain never attacked Obama using the testimony of Larry Sinclair. Who is Larry Sinclair? Sinclair is just about one of the only honest men in America today who knows the Constitution. Those of you who have heard about him may remember the smears, but I have followed the Sinclair story since it surfaced in January, I have heard him on the radio, and I have been privileged to receive personal emails from him. I heard him tell how he was set up to be arrested in Washington, D.C. at the National Press Club, and then transported illegally on a trumped-up charge to New Jersey, where Joe Biden's son is Attorney-General.

Sinclair is a gay man who was in Chicago ten years ago looking for fun in a limo. His driver introduced him to Illinois State Senator Barack Obama, although Sinclair didn't know the tall, black, crack-using homosexual to whom he gave a blowjob that night, and the next day in a hotel, was a member of the Legislature.

Obama was the former lover of a man who was murdered in Chicago in December 2007 named Donald Young - the former choir director at Rev. Jeremiah Wright's church. Young had phoned Sinclair personally a few times, shortly before his death; that is how Sinclair knows that Young was Obama's Chicago loverboy, and a very hurting young man.

McCain and his handlers deliberately never told the American people about Larry Sinclair. It was easier to use Joe The Plumber as an outraged taxpayer. But the American people voted yesterday en masse to try and stop legalized gay marriages. How would they have reacted if they had been told the truth about their Bisexual Messiah?

The Bible has a line somewhere about the Antichrist not being a lover of women, remember? I just throw that in for what it may or may not be worth.

McCain knew that Obama rejected using Federal election funds, and that acceptance by all Presidential candidates is 'supposed' to be a safeguard against corruption in fundraising. Somehow Obama ended up with four times the war chest for his campaign that McCain had.

McCain never talked about Obama's campaign money, or where it was coming from, and why Obama broke his prior promises about fundraising. There is also brewing a scandal about using weird credit cards for this fundraising. They are not just not traceable, they are purposefully given to certain people to begin with.

McCain played the game in this election, letting the media give Obama every break and more.

Obama was either born outside of the United States, or was adopted and taken to Indonesia where he lost whatever American citizenship he had, and was never naturalized to return stateside to attend university. McCain never stood up to demand Obama's birth certificate. McCain stood up to the Los Angeles Times, instead, wanting to see the video of Obama toasting a Palestinian colleague at the University of Chicago.

Compare the seriousness of loose remarks at a dinner, with the seriousness of Obama not being eligible to be the President and the seriousness of the Constitutional crisis which will unfold as the lawsuit of Philip Berg in the Supreme Court, as well as other ongoing lawsuits, progress. By law, everything Obama does as President, if he is ever inaugurated, will be null and void.

McCain has been a traitor to America all his life. That is the lesson of this election. There are a few hundred other traitors in Congress, including those who voted for the Fraud Bailout Bill. "

http://www.rayelan.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=8592

Uncle Sam - 1776 - 2008 - An Obituary

2008-11-05T02:21:00.000-08:00

Uncle Sam was born when the American people were fed up with paying taxes on Britain's national debt.

A brash character, Sam was never the less inventive, youthful and well liked around the world. His children included George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Mark Twain, Thomas Edison,Henry Ford.

The civil war saw the first signs of Sam's constitution failing. The bankers were gradually strangling him and the newspapers covered up the beginning of this protracted crime.

In his final years a president was killed who tried to take on the bankers. The banker/industrialist/Zionists killed a few more thousand of Sam's children on Sept 11th 2001 to con them into war.

In the very final days fat, old and poisoned with so many chemicals in his system Uncle Sam passed away.

Sam is survived by morons.

( A long article on Obama for people with the patience to read it:
http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/OBAMA.HTML )

News "Management"

2008-11-03T11:09:00.000-08:00

American commentators have expressed it well:

"In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. "An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."-- U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917

"
There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.

There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.

The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?

We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes." -- John Swinton (1829-1901). New York Times journalist.

Several news items have caught my attention: The "Brand/Ross" non-story, the BBC's "revelation" that the BNP has approached UKIP for an electoral pact and the BS known as the American Presidential election coverage.

Brand/Ross - Originally there were a handful of complaints. Then a Sunday paper covered and there were a thousand complaints. Then the BBC ITSELF took up the story and rather like a Blue Peter appeal talked up the number of complainers until "complaining" about this dubious duo became a temporary fashion accessory and the "in crowd" grew to 35,000. What is the agenda ? (The Sunday Express carried a story about "Simon Dee" a sixties Ross type character who fell foul of TV bosses after his show carried an interview with James Bond actor George Lazenby who "named" political figures he believed were responsible for the JFK assassination.)

The BNP/UKIP pact - Big deal. Why haven't the BBC and the rest covered the BNP's internal elections or the "December Rebels ?" What is the agenda ? Perhaps the Establishment would like to engineer a UKIP/BNP type merger ? Just speculating. Ex UKIP Cllr Chris Cooke who has commented on UKIP has said that a couple of government operatives were discovered as such by a privately hired detective and yet still continued to work in UKIP's administration department ! Perhaps a merger would cut down the number of MI5 types necessary and lead to cost cutting that would lesson the requirement for 5IMon Darby types !? :-) Truth is , I don't know why the BNP/UKIP was mentioned - but there is a "News" management agenda here.

Obama/McCain - The BBC called Obama's oratory "spell binding". What a load of crap. McCain is an idiot as well. Sarah Pallin, an Ex beauty queen , a possible vice president ! George Bush the current moron. What about him !!!!????? The BBC with this, shite like "Question Time" and the rest of the media try and make us think the puppets are the leaders. This is the matrix.

Dolly The Sheep

2008-11-01T05:30:00.000-07:00

Someone mentioned on the moon landing hoax post that they thought the cloning of Dolly the sheep was also a hoax. Anyone with any thoughts on this particular topic ? Why haven't we heard about Harry the horse or Percy the pig ? etc

Over One Million Iraqi Deaths Caused by US Occupation

2008-10-30T05:48:00.000-07:00

"#1. Over One Million Iraqi Deaths Caused by US Occupation

in Top 25 Censored Stories for 2009

Student Researchers: Danielle Stanton, Tim LeDonne, and Kat Pat Crespán
Faculty Evaluator: Heidi LaMoreaux, PhD

Over one million Iraqis have met violent deaths as a result of the 2003 invasion, according to a study conducted by the prestigious British polling group, Opinion Research Business (ORB). These numbers suggest that the invasion and occupation of Iraq rivals the mass killings of the last century—the human toll exceeds the 800,000 to 900,000 believed killed in the Rwandan genocide in 1994, and is approaching the number (1.7 million) who died in Cambodia’s infamous “Killing Fields” during the Khmer Rouge era of the 1970s.

ORB’s research covered fifteen of Iraq’s eighteen provinces. Those not covered include two of Iraq’s more volatile regions—Kerbala and Anbar—and the northern province of Arbil, where local authorities refused them a permit to work. In face-to-face interviews with 2,414 adults, the poll found that more than one in five respondents had had at least one death in their household as a result of the conflict, as opposed to natural cause.

Authors Joshua Holland and Michael Schwartz point out that the dominant narrative on Iraq—that most of the violence against Iraqis is being perpetrated by Iraqis themselves and is not our responsibility—is ill conceived. Interviewers from the Lancet report of October 2006 (Censored 2006, #2) asked Iraqi respondents how their loved ones died. Of deaths for which families were certain of the perpetrator, 56 percent were attributable to US forces or their allies. Schwartz suggests that if a low pro rata share of half the unattributed deaths were caused by US forces, a total of approximately 80 percent of Iraqi deaths are directly US perpetrated.

Even with the lower confirmed figures, by the end of 2006, an average of 5,000 Iraqis had been killed every month by US forces since the beginning of the occupation. However, the rate of fatalities in 2006 was twice as high as the overall average, meaning that the American average in 2006 was well over 10,000 per month, or over 300 Iraqis every day. With the surge that began in 2007, the current figure is likely even higher.

Schwartz points out that the logic to this carnage lies in a statistic released by the US military and reported by the Brookings Institute: for the first four years of the occupation the American military sent over 1,000 patrols each day into hostile neighborhoods, looking to capture or kill “insurgents” and “terrorists.” (Since February 2007, the number has increased to nearly 5,000 patrols a day, if we include the Iraqi troops participating in the American surge.) Each patrol invades an average of thirty Iraqi homes a day, with the mission to interrogate, arrest, or kill suspects. In this context, any fighting age man is not just a suspect, but a potentially lethal adversary. Our soldiers are told not to take any chances (see Story #9).

According to US military statistics, again reported by the Brookings Institute, these patrols currently result in just under 3,000 firefights every month, or just under an average of one hundred per day (not counting the additional twenty-five or so involving our Iraqi allies). Thousands of patrols result in thousands of innocent Iraqi deaths and unconscionably brutal detentions.

Iraqis’ attempts to escape the violence have resulted in a refugee crisis of mammoth proportion. According to the United Nations Refugee Agency and the International Organization for Migration, in 2007 almost 5 million Iraqis had been displaced by violence in their country, the vast majority of which had fled since 2003. Over 2.4 million vacated their homes for safer areas within Iraq, up to 1.5 million were living in Syria, and over 1 million refugees were inhabiting Jordan, Iran, Egypt, Lebanon, Turkey, and Gulf States. Iraq’s refugees, increasing by an average of almost 100,000 every month, have no legal work options in most host states and provinces and are increasingly desperate.1

Yet more Iraqis continue to flee their homes than the numbers returning, despite official claims to the contrary. Thousands fleeing say security is as bad as ever, and that to return would be to accept death. Most of those who return are subsequently displaced again.

Maki al-Nazzal and Dahr Jamail quote an Iraqi engineer now working at a restaurant in Damascus, “Return to Iraq? There is no Iraq to return to, my friend. Iraq only exists in our dreams and memories.”

Another interviewee told the authors, “The US military say Fallujah is safe now while over 800 men are detained there under the worst conditions. . . . At least 750 out of the 800 detainees are not resistance fighters, but people who refused to collaborate with occupation forces and their tails.” (Iraqis who collaborate with occupation forces are commonly referred to as “tails of the Americans.”)

Another refugee from Baghdad said, “I took my family back home in January. The first night we arrived, Americans raided our house and kept us all in one room while their snipers used our rooftop to shoot at people. I decided to come back here [Damascus] the next morning after a horrifying night that we will never forget.”

Citation

1. “The Iraqi Displacement Crisis,” Refugees International, March 3, 2008.

UPDATE BY MICHAEL SCHWARTZ

The mortality statistics cited in “Is the United States Killing 10,000 Iraqis Every Month?” were based on another article suitable for Project Censored recognition, a scientific investigation of deaths caused by the war in Iraq. The original article, published in Lancet in 2006, received some dismissive coverage when it was released, and then disappeared from view as the mainstream media returned to reporting biased estimates that placed Iraqi casualties at about one-tenth the Lancet estimates. The corporate media blackout of the original study extended to my article as well, and has continued unabated, though the Lancet article has withstood several waves of criticism, while being confirmed and updated by other studies (Censored 2006, #2).

By early 2008, the best estimate, based on extrapolations and replications of the Lancet study, was that 1.2 million Iraqis had died as a consequence of the war. This figure has not, to my knowledge, been reported in any mass media outlet in the United States.

The blackout of the casualty figures was matched by a similar blackout of other main evidence in my article: that the Bush administration military strategy in Iraq assures vast property destruction and lethality on a daily basis. Rules of engagement that require the approximately one thousand US patrols each day to respond to any hostile act with overwhelming firepower—small arms, artillery, and air power—guarantee that large numbers of civilians will suffer and die. But the mainstream media refuses to cover this mayhem, even after the Winter Soldier meetings in March 2008 featured over one hundred Iraq veterans who testified to their own participation in what they call “atrocity producing situations.” (see Story #9)

The effectiveness of the media blackout is vividly illustrated by an Associated Press poll conducted in February 2007, which asked a representative sample of US residents how many Iraqis had died as a result of the war. The average respondent thought the number was under 10,000, about 2 percent of the actual total at that time. This remarkable mass ignorance, like so many other elements of the Iraq War story, received no coverage in the mass media, not even by the Associated Press, which commissioned the study.

The Iraq Veterans Against the War has made the brutality of the occupation their special activist province. The slaughter of the Iraqi people is the foundation of their demand for immediate and full withdrawal of US troops, and the subject of their historic Winter Soldier meetings in Baltimore. Though there was no mainstream US media coverage of this event, the live streaming on Pacifica Radio and on the IVAW website reached a huge audience—including a vast number of active duty soldiers—with vivid descriptions of atrocities committed by the US war machine. A growing number of independent news sites now feature regular coverage of this aspect of the war, including Democracy Now!, Tom Dispatch, Dahr Jamail’s MidEast Dispatches, Informed Comment, Antiwar.com, and ZNet.

UPDATE BY MAKI AL-NAZZAL AND DAHR JAMAIL

The promotion of US general David Petraeus to head CENTCOM, and General Raymond Odierno to replace Petraeus as commanding general of the Multi-National Force in Iraq, provoked a lot of anger amongst Iraqis in both Syria and Jordan. The two generals who convinced US and international society of improvement in Iraq do not seem to have succeeded in convincing Iraqi refugees of their success.

“Just like the Bush Administration decorated Paul Bremer (former head of the Coalition Provisional Authority), they are rewarding others who participated in the destruction to Iraq,” stated Muhammad Shamil, an Iraqi journalist who fled Iraq to Syria in 2006. “What they call violence was concentrated in some parts of Iraq, but now spread to be all over the country, thanks to US war heroes. People are getting killed, evicted or detained by the thousands, from Basra (South) to Mosul (North).”

Other Iraqi refugees seem to have changed attitudes regarding their hopes to return. Compared to when this story was published in March 2008, the refugee crisis continues to deepen. This is exacerbated by the fact that most Iraqis have no intention of returning home. Instead, they are looking for permanent residence in other countries.

“I decided to stop dreaming of going back home and find myself a new home anywhere in the world if I could,” said thirty-two-year-old Maha Numan in Syria, “I have been a refugee for three years now living on the dream of return, but I decided to stop dreaming. I have lost faith in all leaders of the world after the surges of Basra, Sadr City and now Mosul. This seems to be endless and one has to work harder on finding a safe haven for one’s family.”

Iraqis in Syria know a lot more of the news about their country than most journalists. At an Internet café in Damascus, each of them calls his hometown and reports the happenings of the day to other Iraqi refugees. News of ongoing violence across much of Iraq convinces them to remain abroad.

“There were four various explosions in Fallujah today,” said Salam Adel, who worked as a translator for US forces in Fallujah in 2005. “And they say it is safe to go back! Damn them, go back for what? For roadside bombs or car bombs?”

It has been important, politically, for the Bush administration to claim that the situation in Iraq is improving. This claim has been assisted by a complicit corporate media. However, the 1.5 million Iraqis in Syria, and over 750,000 in Jordan, will tell you differently. Otherwise, they would not remain outside of Iraq.

To obtain updated information on the refugee crisis, see http://www.irinnews.org/IRIN-ME.aspx, http://www.iraqredcrescent .org/, http://www.refugeesinternational.org/section/waystohelp, http://www.unhcr.org/iraq.html, and http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/."

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/1-over-one-million-iraqi-deaths-caused-by-us-occupation/

The Power To Create Money - The Heart Of The Problem

2008-10-27T15:05:00.000-07:00

Some well articulated thoughts here:

"The Satanist Banker Conspiracy - Henry Makow

Recently, on his internet radio show, Alan Stang asked me if there is such a thing as a Jewish conspiracy. He gets email from people blaming Jews, Jesuits, the Vatican, Freemasons etc.

I replied that the central banking cartel is the only group that has both the motive and the means to take over the world. Consisting mainly of Cabala-believing Jews and Freemasons, it is the HEAD of the octopus. Zionism, Freemasonry, organized Jewry, Western Imperialism, Jesuits, Vatican, Intelligence agencies, mass media, etc. are among countless octopus arms.

The "motive" is to protect its fraudulent private monopoly over public (government) credit (money creation) which is worth trillions and trillions. They need a "world government" to ensure that no nation creates its own interest free money or defaults on the loans the bankers created out of nothing.

The "means" of course is unlimited money funneled through their network of cartels, which allows them to own the government, mass media, education etc. Anyone who succeeds in public life is their puppet or unconsciously serves their agenda. Their Zionist-Freemason-Communist-Socialist-MI-5/6 network allows them to exercise covert control on the ground.

About 1770, a syndicate of bankers led by Mayer Rothschild started the "Illuminati", a satanic cult designed to subvert society. According to Edith Starr Miller, the Rothschild syndicate included Jewish financiers such as Daniel Itzig, Friedlander, the Goldsmids and Mosses Mocatta. ("Occult Theosophy" p. 184.)

According to Miller, the goals of the Illuminati (Communism and the NWO) were the destruction of Christianity, monarchies, nation-states (in favor of their world government or "internationalism"), the abolition of family ties and marriage by means of promoting homosexuality and promiscuity; the end of inheritance and private property; and the suppression of any collective identity in the spurious name of "universal human brotherhood" i.e. "diversity." (p.185)

SATANISM

The ideology behind this world tyranny, Illuminism, derives from the Jewish Cabala which conveniently preaches that man (i.e. the bankers) can usurp the place of God and redefine reality. Thus, the goal of world banker conspiracy is to enshrine Satan as God. The Illuminati uses revolution, war and financial turmoil to inaugurate their "New World Order."

The world government tyranny is the only conquest to take place without the knowledge of the conquered. In the First Protocol of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," the author says three times, our "countersign" is "Force and Make-believe." By "Make-believe" he means mass deception or "magic."

When alien bankers control the purse strings, inevitably the State becomes synonymous with these bankers. The State is a ruse used to manipulate the masses, "public" in name only. This is the truth behind the "make-believe" face of the Communist NWO.

This tyranny is also the first in history which people cannot mention for fear of being labeled "anti Semitic" and a "hater." Trust me, the hatred is entirely on the Cabalist side.

This ruse is achieved by blaming all Jews for the machinations of a relative few. It's as though all Italians were blamed for the Mafia. As a Jew, I can testify that very few Jews are aware of how they are used by Illuminati-sponsored movements such as the B'nai Brith (Freemasonry); Zionism; Communism; Socialism, Neo-conservatism, Feminism and Liberalism.

Blaming all Jews naturally makes them run interference for the Rothschilds, thus confirming they are all in collusion. Talk about walking into the line of fire! What would we think of Italians if they defended Al Capone and organized crime on a racial basis? The bankers have always run organized Jewry and used Jews as their pawns and pitchmen.

"Anti-Semite" and "hate" are used like a witch doctor's curse from which all shrink in horror. To neutralize this voodoo, we should wear the badge of anti-Semite with pride, by asserting that it stands for opposition to the disproportionate Jewish (and crypto-Jewish) role in advancing the New World Order. (No one is advocating or condoning genocide.) Thus, anti-Semitism will assume its role as a legitimate political (not racial) movement directed against specific Jewish (and non-Jewish) Illuminati-pawns and policies.

Like everyone else, Jews are kept in a bubble and told anti- Semitism is an irrational Gentile sickness. They have been brainwashed to see themselves as innocent victims. Most have suffered from the machinations of their Zionist "leaders." But many others were Bolshevik murderers and oppressors. And Illumnati Masons and Jews are the administrators of the New World Order.

("murderers" http://www.savethemales.ca/ communism_disguises_illuminati.html)

THE BIGGEST REVELATION

The biggest revelation for me was realizing that Judaism is not a religion but a pagan racial creed at best, and a Satanic secret society at worst. The nature of a secret society is that the membership is fed idealistic platitudes and not told the real agenda. I expand on this discovery in my forthcoming "Illuminati-The Cult that Hijacked the World."

Most Jews are unaware that Judaism largely eschews the Old Testament (Torah) in favor of the Talmud and Cabala. Very few Jews read these books. If they did, they might realize that the Talmud is full of hate and contempt for non-Jews. They would discover that the Cabala is the basis of modern witchcraft, astrology, numerology, tarot cards, black magic, androgyny, and much of the New Age movement. It is the basis of Illuminism which teaches that good and evil are one and that black is white and vice-versa. They operate by doing evil while espousing good.

The Cabala is the basis of the cult of sex worship that has engulfed the world. Cabalistic Jews can't do anything mundane on the Lord's Day but conjugal sex is a prescribed ritual. Physical desire supposedly increases a man's love for God, and intercourse is an instrument for uniting with God. (This, of course, is rubbish. You unite with God by doing His Will seven days a week. Sex is a physical function like eating.)

Cabalist Jews tell this joke privately: "An orthodox Jew is interviewing three applicants for a job. He asks them, 'What is 2 plus 2?' The first two answer 4 and 22. He kicks them out. The third answers "What ever you want it to be.' He is hired." This is what we are up against in the NWO, an attempt to redefine reality to suit their interests.

The arc of Western Civilization has been from worship-of-God (rise) to worship-of-Satan (fall.) I suspect the Cabala is the blueprint of post-Christian civilization, the reason we are drowning in media-generated filth, violence, occultism and fear. The apex was the so-called "Enlightenment" when men were taught they could use "reason" (i.e. expedience) and ignore God's natural and spiritual (moral) order. Typically, the consequent decline into moral darkness is represented by Luciferians as light, sunrise (eg. Obama's logo.)

According to Texe Marrs, the Cabala teaches that the "holy serpent is the true God; that all the evil that a person does, through alchemy is magically transformed into righteousness; and that yes, Lucifer is Lord. Satan is the true and only god. That is the essential doctrine of Cabalism." (Codex Magica p. 426.)

PUBLIC LIFE

The fraudulent nature of our public life all stems from the fundamental fraud, Illuminati control of public credit. Thus we have a government sponsored depopulation program in the guise of feminism and gay rights. Thus we have the spectacle of two mind-controlled Illuminati puppets vying for the US Presidency. The case of Barack Obama is the most outrageous. He cannot even prove he is an American citizen. His real father, Communist activist Frank Marshall Davis, was a rapist and pedophile who probably sexually abused his son. http://www.nationalenquirer.com/obama_sex_perv_scandal/celebrity/65575

Larry Sinclair claims he has had sex and smoked crack with Obama in the late 1990's. Oddly, this resume is perfect for the Illuminati. Obama can be easily controlled or the Illuminati media will stop ignoring these stories. (To see a puppet malfunctioning, check out the You Tubes of Obama without a teleprompter.http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=omHUsRTYFAU)

Now Joe Biden is prophesying (http://blogs.abcnews.com/ politicalradar/2008/10/biden-to-suppor.html) that Obama will be severely tested after coming to office and will betray his supporters and plummet in the polls. He seems to be describing something like martial law. An odd thing to say before the election. (Notice the Republicans are ignoring all this. The Dems and GOP are 2 branches of the Satanist i.e. Illuminati Party.)

CONCLUSION

If your ethnic or religious group, or lodge, is being used secretly for evil, you had better distance yourself from it or you will be left holding the bag. This applies to almost everyone, not just Jews. As an ethnic Jew, I ask, does the Jewish god represent a universal moral order or a primitive tribal egregore (i.e. projection of group psyche?) Is the Jewish egregore now Lucifer?

The world has been taken over by a satanic cult. We are under constant occult attack. Instead of fighting among ourselves like they want, we must recognize that this struggle has only two sides --God's and Satan's."

http://rense.com/general83/13h.htm

Rare Penetration Of The Shadow Government By The "Mainstream"

2008-10-26T05:52:00.000-07:00

It always surprises me when a "mainstream" journalist does some real digging or produces some comment that reveals something of the real/shadow government. I wonder how an editor lets it through ? The journalist/prostitutes at the local paper/rag aka The Express & Star certainly make sure that they don't fall foul of their editor/pimp....

Regarding the below article. Are we surprised with speculation regarding politicians chasing funding from the oligarchs ?

The writer mentions Maggie Thatcher. I saw an episode of Top Gear where Clarkson is listening to Thatcher's biography on audio tape and gets a few laughs.With this in mind, when I saw Mrs T's cassettes in a charity shop,I bought them myself for a few pence and listened while doing the ironing. What struck me was how much she really believed she was running the country. I think she was definitely deluded.....

Anyway. The article:

"Even a Bullingdon baronet can struggle in the rarefied air above democracy

Poor George Osborne. He is a sort of anti-Groucho Marx. One cannot help but suspect he has spent his life desperately caring to belong to clubs that don't really want him as a member.

That said, the unravelling of events this past week has been screamingly funny - if not quite A Night at the Opera, then certainly An Afternoon in Corfu. For weeks after he first leaked the story of Peter Mandelson's Greek island poison-dripping about Gordon Brown, the shadow chancellor had been disporting himself with the gravity-resistant cockiness of a cartoon character who has run over the edge of a cliff, but has yet to look down. That particular illusion has come to an abrupt end, and it is now Mandelson's turn to evoke the stuff of fiction, with his twinkly-eyed refusal to condemn Osborne, after that job has been done for him, more than a little redolent of Francis Urquhart's: "You might think that; I couldn't possibly comment."

To class Osborne as socially out of his depth in all of this might seem odd: he has led a gilded life, after all. But reading this tale of yachts and billionaires and people who need not trouble themselves with anything so vulgar as democracy, he seems a mere parvenu, whose maladroit grasp of etiquette now threatens to destroy him. (I am somehow reminded of that other supposed big hitter, Sir Alex Ferguson, being devastatingly outmanoeuvred by the tycoons John Magnier and JP McManus over the racehorse Rock of Gibraltar, a row in which the Manchester United manager was made powerfully aware of the minuscule nature of the pond in which he was the big fish.)

George's family are in wallpaper. Trade, I suppose you'd call it for a laugh, and though he wouldn't be required to use the back entrance - his father is the 17th baronet - there is much to suggest he has always been more Charles Ryder than Sebastian Flyte.

At the Bullingdon Club he was known as Oik, on account of having gone to St Paul's as opposed to somewhere proper like Eton or Harrow. It's only surmise, but one suspects he was rather more often the Bullingdon's raggee than the ragger, with one such ragging a neat metaphor for what has been happening to him all week. The young Osborne was held upside down by his fellow members, who banged his head on the floor each time he failed to answer correctly the question: "What are you?" He got it eventually. The unexpurgated answer was: "I am a despicable cunt."

Even in the newest Bullingdon photo to surface, Osborne looks gauche. There's something brittle and unconvincing to his swagger, tucked away downstage right in a made-up bow tie, while Nat Rothschild stares inscrutably out from the centre. Hand-tied bow tie, obviously.

Much has been made of Rothschild's private nature, and he seems to have an instinctive grasp of how to turn any weaker personality traits - perhaps even catagelophobia, the fear of being ridiculed - to his advantage, cultivating an air of quiet steel, rather in the way that Charles Saatchi or Kate Moss have long traded on the intriguing power of saying nothing at all.

Osborne has betrayed himself as the opposite - a blabbermouth who picked a fight with Mandelson on ground on which he was so compromised that a regional sales rep whose Vauxhall Astra glovebox contains a copy of The Art of War could tell you that defeat was inevitable. Even more staggering, for a chap who has known Rothschild since they were at prep school, was Osborne's inability to realise that leaking details of conversations that took place while he was enjoying Rothschild's hospitality would incense his host.

Corfugate is primarily a tale of club rules broken. Not literal clubs, in most cases - though Bilderberg Group meetings have been mentioned - but the deck-shoed networks of the super-powerful, who sweetly allow politicians the illusion of being allowed to run things, and even to start the odd war, so long as they think it will bring down the price of oil. Most of the politicians ever allowed within a sniff of this world learn its mores, just as Mandelson has. They are pathetically grateful to be asked to Rupert Murdoch's annual retreats; they allow Murdoch's son-in-law Matthew Freud to buy them £34,000-worth of private jet travel, as Cameron did on this same Greek trip; and they don't do anything so vulgar as to mention in the register of members' interests that they had a meeting with Mr Murdoch while they were there.

This is nothing new. John Campbell's brilliant biography of Margaret Thatcher chronicles forensically the manner in which Thatcher treated Murdoch as a powerful Reagan-like friend and ally, given free access to her, and invited several times to spend Christmas at Chequers. And yet, she never once mentioned Murdoch in her memoirs.

Whatever goes on in the rarefied air above democracy will always be politicians' dirty little secret. If it wasn't such a dirty big one, that is. The only mystery is why we seem to restrict use of the word oligarch to Russians. Oleg Deripaska, the man Osborne allegedly solicitied for a donation, is described thusly, though not Mr Murdoch, or indeed Mr Freud. Let us end this reticence. What greater credit to our meritocracy, after all, than an erstwhile popstar press officer's rise to princemaker?"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/25/osborne-rothschild-deripaska-corfu

The Incredible Powers of Celery Juice

2008-10-25T12:05:00.000-07:00

Here's something a little different from my usual posts. A friend sent me this link. I'd mentioned that one of my favourite juices was carrot/beetroot/celery. The celery component is especially quenching after a workout....

"(NaturalNews) Celery juice is highly nutritious and one of the most hydrating foods we can put in our bodies. Because it is incredibly alkalizing, it equalizes the body's PH, which is vital for peak health. In ancient times, it was considered a medicinal herb used to treat a variety of health complaints. The minerals and vitamins and nutrients are in perfect harmony with each other. Celery leaves are high in vitamin A, whilst the stems are an excellent source of vitamins B1, B2, B6 and C and dense in potassium, folic acid, calcium, magnesium, iron, phosphorus, sodium and essential amino acids.

This super food also contains important concentrations of plant hormones and the very special essential oils that give celery its characteristic smell. These oils help to regulate the nervous system, and are very calming.

Celery is rich in sodium, which is very different to table salt. Normal table salt is composed of insoluble inorganic compounds which lead to the development of varicose veins, hardening of the arteries and other aliments. If salt, including sea salt is white, then it has been processed and all minerals and nutrients have been destroyed.

On the other hand, the sodium that is available in celery is soluble and organic (live), and is essential for the body. Organic salt allows the body to use the other nutrients that are taken into the body. Every cell in our body is constantly bathed in a salt solution, and if the salt level is not in balance, dehydration occurs. This is why celery juice is a perfect rehydration drink for athletes.

Other Benefits of Celery Juice

Fights Cancer - Celery is known to contain at least eight families of anti-cancer compounds. A study at Rutgers University of New Jersey found that celery contains a number of compounds that help prevent cancer cells from spreading. Celery contains compounds called acetylenics and this compound has been shown to stop the growth of tumor cells. Celery contains other compounds called phonolic acids that block the action of hormone-like substances called prostaglandins, which encourage the growth of tumor cells. Coumarins, another phytonutrient in celery helps prevent free-radicals from damaging cells and prevent the formation and development of the colon and stomach cancers.

Lowers Cholesterol - Laboratory studies also indicate that butyl phthalide, a chemical in celery, may help reduce LDL (bad) cholesterol. According to researchers at the University of Chicago, celery reduces cholesterol levels by as much as 7 points with as little as 2 stalks a day. Celery also aids in increasing bile acid secretion which helps to remove cholesterol from the body.

Aids in Digestion - Special nutrients in the fiber are released during juicing that aid bowel movements. This makes celery a natural laxative that helps to relieve constipation. It also helps relax nerves that have been overworked by man-made laxatives.

Diuretic - The potassium and sodium in celery juice are powerful body fluid regulators that stimulate urine production to help rid the body of excess fluid.

Anti Inflammatory - The polyacetylene in celery is an amazing relief for all inflammation including rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, gout, asthma and bronchitis. A study published in the Proceeding of the National Academy of Science U.S.A found that another powerful phytonutrient called luteolin prevents activation of a pathway that allows inflammation in the brain to get switched on. Luteolin also inhibits the excess production of TNF-alpha, a direct cause of inflammation. Juice is the most efficient and nutritious way to eat celery, and people who have these conditions can drink as much juice as desired without overdosing.

Lower blood pressure - Celery's potential for reducing high blood pressure has long been recognized by Chinese medicine. Studies show that drinking celery juice every day for 1 week can significantly help lower blood pressure. A compound called phtalides helps relax the muscles around the arteries, dilating the vessels and allowing blood to flow smoothly. Pthalides also reduce stress hormones, one of whose effects is to cause blood vessels to constrict. When researchers injected 3-n-butyl phthalide derived from celery into laboratory animals, the animals' blood pressure dropped 12 to 14 percent. Celery amazingly doesn't lower blood pressure which is already low.

Insomnia - The minerals and essential oils in celery juice have a calming effect on the nervous system, making it beneficial for insomniacs. Its high magnesium levels help people to relax into a soothing and restful sleep.

Weight loss - Drinking celery juice frequently throughout the day helps curb cravings for sweet. It is filling without putting any extra pounds on.

Elimination and Prevention of stones - Celery juice is an amazing eliminator of toxins from the body, which aids in the breaking and elimination of urinary and gall bladder stones. This lovely juice helps those who have suffered from stones from getting them again.

Increased Sexuality - Celery juice is beneficial for weak sexuality, yet doesn't cause an uncontrollable urge as some pharmaceutical drugs do. Celery balances the system rather than increasing it.

Celery can be juiced with any other fruits or vegetables. A particularly delicious and powerful combination is carrot, apple, cucumber and celery."

http://www.naturalnews.com/024596.html

Politicians As "Luvvies"

2008-10-22T14:30:00.000-07:00

I don't have much of an axe to grind regarding homosexuals/gays/bisexuals as individuals to be honest. However my growing realisation that "successful" "politicians" are little more than "actors" raises an interesting number of issues.

One of which is that this theory would certainly be corroborated by a disproportionate number of homosexual/gays/bisexuals in politics. Well, this seems to be the case. Where does one start ?: Blair, Mandelson, Gri££in (plus a few others in the inner circle), Edward Heath, Greville Janner, the leader of the Labour group in Sandwell Council and the list could go on.

A name to be added to that list may be Jorg Haider, according to a Daily Mail article. There are a number of articles doing the rounds suggesting he was bumped off by the Establishment. A motive may well emerge. I make no judgement on Haider, but his alleged lifestyle had me scratching my head.

I think we take it for granted that people like Kenneth Williams, Oscar Wilde and Freddie Mercury, to take just three random homosexual/bisexual figures in the performing arts have provided entertainment to many in different ways. I believe homosexuality in men is largely hereditary. In so far as there's a place for everybody/everything in the universe, I suggest that the "arts" are a better sphere of activity for homosexuals. Why do I say this ? Well. Not every homosexual is a paedophile. They are, however, disproportionately represented in this category and sexual deviancy generally. There are two different types of deviancy. Legal and Illegal. The problem with the latter is the practitioner is vulnerable to blackmail and manipulation... and I think this is the big problem.

For A Few Dollars More

2008-10-22T04:41:00.000-07:00

I copied this VERY IMPORTANT OBSERVATION from the comments section of the below video:

"The Federal Reserve does not put money into the economy. That is a myth. It loans the money to banks, which then become part of the banks' reserves. The reserves are used as a base or a catalyst to create additional money via loans based on the fractional reserve principle. Based on a reserve requirement of 10%, one dollar can create $9 in loans, euphemistically called credit."

The relationship between a country's central bank (Bank Of England, Federal Reserve etc) and it's "High Street" banks is therefore, the one we continually need to explore...and more specifically, named individuals. We need to drag these grey anonymous individuals, kicking and screaming, into the light, and ignore those paid actors that the unenlightened regard as the country's "leaders".

Why Wont The Bail Out Work?

Bank Of England's Monetary Policy Committee

2008-10-18T15:04:00.000-07:00

Good research from "Blue Eyes":

"Mervyn King - From October 1984 he was Professor of Economics at the London School of Economics. King joined the Bank in March 1991 as Chief Economist and Executive Director, having been a non-executive director from 1990 to 1991. He was appointed Deputy Governor in 1997, taking up his post on 1 June 1998. In the same year King became a member of the influential Washington-based financial advisory body, the Group of Thirty. The Group of Thirty was founded in 1978 by Geoffrey Bell at the initiative of the Rockefeller Foundation, which also provided initial funding for the body. Its first chairman was Johannes Witteveen, the former managing director of the International Monetary Fund. Its current chairman of trustees is Paul Volcker. He is best known as Chairman of the Federal Reserve ("The Fed") under United States Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan (from August 1979 to August 1987). He is today an economic advisor to Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. He also attended the London School of Economics in the early 1950s.

Sir Edward George - George joined the Bank after graduating from Emmanuel College, Cambridge in 1962. Apart from secondments to Moscow State University, the Bank for International Settlements and the International Monetary Fund, he remained there throughout his career.

Sir Howard Davies - Director of the London School of Economics and Political Science, having taken over the post in 2003 from sociologist Anthony, now Lord, Giddens. In 2004 he became a non-executive Director of Morgan Stanley.

Dr. DeAnne Shirley Julius - is a respected British-based American economist, notable as a founder member of the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England. She has also worked at the World Bank and extensively in the private sector, and since July 2003 she has been Chairman of Chatham House in London - formally known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Early in her career, which has spanned America and England, Julius was a project economist with the World Bank in Washington. She has also worked for the Central Intelligence Agency as an analyst

Sir Alan Peter Budd - studied at the London School of Economics before doing a PhD at the University of Cambridge. He is a senior adviser to Credit Suisse First Boston and a consultant to the G8 Group.

Sushil Wadhwani - previously Director of Equity Strategy at Goldman Sachs International (1991-95) and before that Reader/Lecturer in Economics at the London School of Economics (1984-91).

Stephen John Nickell - He was a postgraduate student at the London School of Economics, where he took the degree of Master of Science and was awarded the Ely Devons Prize. He worked at the London School of Economics from 1970 until 1984, and again from 1998 until 2006, initially as Lecturer (1970-77), Reader (1977-79), and Professor of Economics (1979-84). From 1998 until 2006 he returned to the London School of Economics as School Professor of Economics.

What's consistent through all these is the London School of Economics. The London School of Economics was founded in 1895 by Fabian Society members Sidney and Beatrice Webb, Graham Wallas, and George Bernard Shaw! The Royal Institute of International Affairs has worked closely with the London School of Economics, which was set up as a training school for the World Order bureaucrats. Prof. J.H. Morgan wrote in Quarterly Review, Jan. 1939, “When I once asked Lord Haldane why he persuaded his friend Sir Ernest Cassel, grandfather of Lady Mountbatten, to settle by his will large sums on the London School of Economics, he replied, our object is to make this institution a place to raise and train the bureaucracy of the future Socialist State.” George Soros - a Rothschild agent - sudied here in the late 1940s and Sir Evelyn de Rothschild has also been a governor of this establishment.

There is a great link of people to do with the London School of Economics at:-
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/List-of-London-School-of-Economics-People
Some interesting names pop up - Clement Atlee, JFK, Romano Prodi, Moshe Sharett - Prime Minister of Israel(1953-1955), Bertrand Russell, Arnold Joseph Toynbee, Harold Laski, Leo Abse (British MP, famous for legalisation of male homosexuality), Ruth Kelly, Ed Milliband, Elliott Abrams, Michael Chertoff, Richard Perle, David Rockefeller and Dov Zakheim.

We can quite clearly see from this information the diabolical and insidious link between bankers, politicians and Fabian Socialists.

Other establishments that pop up include Moscow State University, the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund,Morgan Stanley, the CIA, Credit Suisse First Boston, G8, Goldman Sachs, World Bank and the most sinister out of everything mentioned The Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House)."

How Deeply Is The U.S. Involved In The Afghan Drug Trade ?

2008-10-17T11:46:00.000-07:00

We need to remember that drug dealing is sanctioned at the highest level. There's so much that can be said about all of this. The CIA's involvement has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt. Going back further the British ruling class even fought a war with China to supply the Chinese people with opium.

Drug dealing is related to providing "cash liquidity" to economies. Mike Ruppert, an Ex LA cop who blew the whistle on the CIA , articulates this well. A sick part of this is that banks that allow laundered drug money have shares in the private prisons that benefit from the slave labour in those establishments.

Drugs of course are evil. The social problems provide for more social workers etc to "sort" the problems out - more government and readers of "Marxism For Social Workers". If there was a political will we just wouldn't have major drug problems with all the associated crime etc

Some have speculated by analogy with the apparent allowed drug smuggling into jails that a drugged population as a whole is one that can offer the least resistance to authority...

"

How Deeply is the U.S. involved in the Afghan Drug Trade?

Experience in Indochina and Central America suggests that CIA, the principal paymaster for U.S.-backed Afghan warlords, may be more deeply involved in the drug trade than we yet know.

October 16, 2008

Afghanistan is in a `downward spiral,' the Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen, admitted last week, giving the most negative view of that conflict heard in Washington.

Military men are programmed to always be optimistic, so Admiral Mullen's grim words were particularly noteworthy. They also flatly contradicted the rosy claims of `progress' in Afghanistan made by the Bush administration and its increasingly dispirited allies in Canada, France, Germany, Italy and other NATO nations that were dragooned into this deeply unpopular war.

Most Europeans see the Afghan conflict as a 19th-century style colonial war for regional domination and resources. By contrast, Americans are still being misled by their corporate media and posturing politicians of both parties into believing the seven-year U.S. occupation of Afghanistan is a noble `anti-terrorism' mission that is defending women's rights and rebuilding a ravage nation instead of another brutal grab for energy, this time from the Caspian Basin.

In a troubling example of Vietnam-style 'mission creep,' the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David McKiernan, is calling for 15,000 more American troops on top of the 8,000 now slated to arrive in January 2009. His predecessor told Congress that 400,000 U.S. troops would be needed to pacify Afghanistan.

But McKiernan also called for talks with Afghan nationalists resisting western occupation collectively known as Taliban. Days earlier, it was revealed that senior British officers and diplomats in Afghanistan had called the US-led war `un-winnable' and advocated peace talks with Taliban.

Admiral Mullen also ordered U.S. and NATO forces to begin targeting Afghanistan's opium and heroin dealers. Under American tutelage, Afghanistan has become the world's leading narco-state, surpassing even Colombia, and now producing 90% of the world's heroin. Well over half of the nation's GDP consists of drug money. Considering this, Admiral Mullen's 'shoot on sight' orders seem rather overdue.

The 64,000 rupee question that arises from Admiral Mullen's new anti-drug policy is: Why was it not done seven years ago when the U.S. invaded Afghanistan? Why did Washington turn a blind eye to the Afghan drug trade and is only now taking some action?

The answer is simple and dismaying. America's local allies in Afghanistan, the politicians and warlords who overthrew Taliban in 2001, are up to their turbans in the heroin trade. Drug money is the blood that courses through Afghanistan's veins and keeps the economy limping along. The U.S.-installed Karzai regime in Kabul propped up by US and NATO bayonets has only two sources of income: cash handouts from Washington, and the proceeds of drug dealing.

When Taliban ruled 90% of Afghanistan from 1996-2001, it almost totally stamped out poppy cultivation as un-Islamic. The UN's drug control agency has confirmed this fact. The only remaining source of drug dealing was in the remote northeast of Afghanistan controlled by the Russian and Iranian-backed Northern Alliance, made up of Tajik Panshiri tribesmen, brutal Uzbek warlord Rashid Dostam, and the remains of the old Afghan Communist Party.

In 2001, the U.S. overthrew Taliban and put the drug-dealing Northern Alliance and Communists in power. Since then, Afghanistan's drug production has spread across the nation and exports have soared by 60-70%, making Afghanistan the source of nearly all the world's supply of heroin.

Washington called off efforts by the Drug Enforcement Agency to combat the Afghan drug trade for fear of endangering the power base of its former CIA `asset,' President Hamid Karzai. Starting with Karzai's brother, Ahmed Wali, the U.S.-installed regime's most important supporters are all involved in varying degrees with the heroin trade. As this writer has seen himself, almost every important warlord gets revenue from the drug trade. The Northern Alliance warlords are considered the biggest of the nation's narco-dealers. Ahmed Karzai denies involvement.

Moving against the drug warlords would have meant undermining Karzai's sole domestic support. So Washington held its nose and let the drug trade flourish in order to sustain the occupation. The faux `war on terror' and lust for Caspian energy trumped the old war on drugs.

Experience in Indochina and Central America suggests that CIA, the principal paymaster for U.S.-backed Afghan warlords, may be more deeply involved in the drug trade than we yet know.

Author Alfred McCoy's wrote a brilliant study in his ground-breaking `The Politics of Heroin' in which he documents how first French, then American intelligence was drawn into the heroin trade in Laos and Vietnam as a way of supporting anti-Communist guerilla fighters. The same thing happened in Central America where CIA collaborated with cocaine-dealing members of the anti-Communist Contras.

In both cases, drugs served as a currency and became more important than paper money. French and American spies even ended up transporting heroin for their local allies. The same may be happening in Afghanistan.

Equally disturbing, there is no way that simple Afghan farmers or Taliban fighters are running the drug trade, as Washington claims. Poppy sap is collected and converted into opium tar. Then it is smuggled to secret labs in Pakistan to be transformed into first morphine base, and then purified into heroin. None of these drugs would move south into Pakistan or be processed with imported chemicals without the full cooperation and assistance of the Afghan government, its supporting warlords, and local Pakistani officials. The drugs are then smuggled out of the port of Karachi, again under at protection by port and local officials. Pakistan is a key U.S. ally.

The Karzai regime has been totally corrupted by the drug trade, and so has parts of Pakistan's establishment. But the United States has also become corrupted in the sense that it has done nothing to combat this scourge and has collaborated with Afghanistan's drug barons by at minimum turning blind eye.

When the history of U.S. involvement in Afghanistan is written, Washington's sordid involvement in the heroin trade and its alliance with drug lords and war criminals of the Afghan Communist Party will be one of the most shameful chapters."

http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m48016&hd=&size=1&l=e

Bank Of England Directors

2008-10-14T10:24:00.000-07:00

Following on from an understanding perhaps that the Bank Of England is a "regulatory" body rather than a money making entity in it's own right. The notion that the commercial banks (Lloyds, Barclays etc) are the ones that make the big bucks was well articulated in the previous article Shedding Some Light On The Bank Of England.

I think the next step is therefore to look for links between the BoE directors and other interests - specifically Lloyds, Barclays and the rest.

Old Blue Eyes a valued regular contributor to this blog provided the following historical extract in comments:

"The following is taken from an excellent piece entitled The Enemy Within the Empire - A SHORT HISTORY OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND
By ERIC D. BUTLER. Full piece at:-
http://www.bankwatch.info/

'Mr. Paul Einzig, in his admiring biography of Mr. Montagu Norman, wrote: "The efforts of the Macmillan Committee to throw more light upon the machine of the Bank of England failed almost completely. . . . Indeed, the evidence of Mr. Norman is a study in non-committal and evasive answers."

However, some significant facts were brought to light. Mr. A. N. Field, the New Zealand author, writes as follows:
"The Bank of England is controlled by a Governor, a Deputy Governor, and twenty-three directors elected by holders of £500 or more of Bank Stock. The Court of Directors is not required by law to meet more than twice a year. Sir Ernest Harvey explained that the Bank is really managed by what he called 'an Inner Cabinet,' known as the Committee of the Treasury. This Inner Cabinet consists of the Governor, Deputy Governor, and nine directors elected from among their number by the Court of Directors. The rest of the directors stay outside."

From the questions asked of Sir Ernest Harvey, some members of the Macmillan Committee were strongly under the impression that certain powerful firms had permanently reserved seats on the Bank of England. Mr. J. M. Keynes, the economist, asked whether 'the class of merchant bankers from whom the directors of the Bank are largely drawn historically, by reason of ancient tradition, is suited to modern conditions.'
Sir Ernest Harvey replied that recent tendency 'has not been to follow quite the old historical tradition.'
He doubted whether it would be possible to collect by any other method a body of men 'so absolutely unbiassed and disinterested in judgment,' and 'if the names of the representatives of certain firms do appear it is generally the result of seeking for somebody of the very highest financial standing in the City of London,' etc., etc

Mr. J. T. Walton Newbold, another member of the Committee, chipped in with a remark that: 'It is very strange how certain merchant bankers have members of their firms appearing on the Court of Directors over a period of fifty years. As fast as one goes off another comes on.'
Sir Ernest Harvey replied that this was not true in recent years except in one case. Mr. Newbold rejoined that there had been a continuity in merchant bankers since 1889, adding, 'I checked it the other day.'
Sir Ernest Harvey said: 'No, pardon me, there has always been an interval, except once.' Whether the 'interval' was in the nature of hours, days, months, or years, was not disclosed, the matter being dropped at this point.

The 'merchant bankers' referred to as sitting so continuously on the directorate of the Bank of England and thus controlling the British Empire were later on described to the Macmillan Committee by Sir Robert M. Kindersley, himself a director of one of these firms, that of Lazard Brothers. They are also known as 'issuing houses' for big loan flotations and as 'acceptance houses.'

'Practically every acceptance house of long standing in this country,' said Sir Robert M. Kindersley, 'commenced purely as merchants trading with foreign countries, and a great many of them, most of them, I think I may say, are of foreign origin. If you take the names, Goschen, Hambro, Klienwort, and Lazard, and Brandt, you can go through the whole list of them, and I think you will find a very large number, the majority, are people of foreign origin. . . . It is only the origin . . . some people might think they are still very largely, perhaps, under foreign influence, which, of course, is not so.'

In spite of Sir Robert Kindersley's assurances, the fact remains that when the Great War broke out in 1914, the head of one prominent firm of merchant bankers, long represented on the directorate of the Bank of England, was discovered to have omitted even the easy formality of naturalisation. This was Baron Bruno von Shroeder, who, according to statements by Lord Wittenham in the House of Lords on July 26, 1918, had to be naturalised after war was declared in order to save the solvency of the City of London.' "

I previously made the comment that although things of an outward appearence were no doubt different, the essential reality would still be the same.

Here is my latest exchange with the Bank Of England:

"Hello,
Is there a register of the (business) interests of the various Bank of England directors and committee members ?

Could you also tell how the directors and committee members are chosen please.

Many Thanks
Simon"

"Hello Simon

Thank you for your enquiry.

Since 1946, the Bank of England has been a nationalised institution, whose constitution and powers are governed by various acts and charters, the most recent of which is the Bank of England Act 1998. Under this, the nominations to our Court of Directors (the positions of Governor, Deputy Governor and Non-Executive Directors) are termed 'Crown' appointments, which effectively means that the positions concerned are made on the advice of the Prime Minister to the HM The Queen.

It is the responsibility of the Treasury to oversee this, and a link to them may be followed at:

www.hm-treasury.gov.uk

Should you wish to see about our charters and statutes, please go to:

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/about/legislation/legis.htm

Click on the one entitled 'the 1998 Act', then turn to page 26, where the system of appointments for MPC members is detailed.

A register of business interests of the directors may be found on pages 8 and 9 of the 2008 Annual Report and Accounts, at:

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/annualreport/index.htm

whilst potted biographies and business interests of MPC members are available at:

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/about/people/index.htm

I hope that this will have been of assistance.

Yours sincerely

Malcolm Shemmonds"

So the possibility of a bit more digging exists for us here ....

Another Letter NOT Published By The Express And Star

2008-10-13T05:53:00.000-07:00

You may think that the thoughts of an elected councillor might hold some sort of sway with the local media. This isn't the case. Thank God for the internet anyway.

The initial impetus for the Nationalist Truth blog was that BNP deputy leader 5IMon Darby had his thoughts published in the Wolverhampton Express & Star regarding my resignation from the BNP BUT MY RESPONSE AS A LOCAL ELECTED COUNCILLOR WAS NOT PUBLISHED !

If we were to dig do some research we'd probably find the owners/editors of the Express & Star frequenting the same masonic lodges as Darby and the rest. Truth is, politicians don't run the country. They are actors who present the required product for public consumption. If an elected representative espouses a "Non Establishment viewpoint", his or her thoughts are not deemed fit for publishing by the media.

Based on my previous experience I knew it was unlikely that my new letter wouldn't be published and anticipated publishing it here. The letter was in response to Sandwell resident, Mr Wilkinson who was frustrated with local councillors:

"Mr Wilkinson was quite correct in his statement : "What is the point of having local councillors when central government makes so many decisions on their behalf ?"  
 
There are many other instances of this:  
1/ The siting of telephone masts  
2/ The mosque fiasco in the neighbouring borough of Dudley  
3/ The impotence of councillors to genuinely help in housing matters  
4/ The totalitarian central government quango "Standards Boards" which comes down on councillors who have the temerity to exercise free speech.  

People don't vote because they realise that it really doesn't make a difference. All politicians get paid not to rock the boat. If you try and do real work rather than have photo opportunities with a fluorescent jacket,hard hat and a stupid grin, you suffer the consequences.
Councillor Simon Smith "  

After waiting a couple of weeks I then sent this email:

Hello ,  
Can you just confirm that you didn't publish my letter I sent a week or two ago please ?  
Thanks  
Councillor Simon Smith  

Assuming that it wasn't published - and I believe it was effectively "a right of reply" - could you please tell me what the editorial policy is in regard to publishing (or not publishing) letters from myself. (ie an elected councillor)"


This is what I got back:

"Dear Mr Smith, 

Thank you for your email which has been forwarded to me for reply. I can confirm that your letter has not yet been published in the Express & Star. Our policy on readers' letters is that the Editor reserves the right to cut or reject any letters submitted. We receive around 70 letters a day, therefore the Editor chooses which of these he would like to publish.  

I hope these comments are helpful. 

Kind regards, 

Charlie Brechtmann 
Editor's Secretary 
Express & Star Ltd "

The Moon Landing Hoax Revisited

2008-10-12T17:08:00.000-07:00

Just been listening to Marcus Allen from Nexus magazine on Talksport. He did a brilliant show squashing the arguments of all the people who believe in the NASA version of events. There were many people who rang Talksport agreeing with the premise viz The landings were hoaxed.

One caller made a good observation. Why didn't Aldrin or Armstrong pan round with the video camera to show the earth ? Of course there are many other indicators of NASA's fake.

Marcus Allen mentioned that the 40 billion dollars spent on the Apollo mission at the time was of the same order of magnitude as the Federal Reserve's 700 billion bailout in today's money.

I recommend:

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html

SHEDDING some LIGHT on the BANK of ENGLAND

2008-10-11T02:17:00.000-07:00

This is a very good article brought to our attention by a blog reader.The author seems to know his subject:

"

SHEDDING some LIGHT on
the BANK of ENGLAND

by Richard Greaves

Prosperity, January 2005

URL: http://www.prosperityuk.com/prosperity/articles/boe1.html

There is no great mystery today surrounding the Bank of England -- its annual report, which anyone can obtain, contains full sets of accounts and is quite clear and explicit about its composition and functions which, incidentally, have changed substantially since its formation back in 1694.

In its early days it lent to British overseas enterprises such as the East India Company and the Hudson's Bay Company -- as well as slave traders, all of which brought in big profits to both the bank and the entrepreneurs concerned.

As the government's banker it also profited by lending to government to finance a series of costly wars during the eighteenth century.

National debt increased dramatically as a result, and taxation went up to pay the interest.

However by the mid-nineteenth century, as well as being the government's sole banker, the Bank of England had become the bankers' bank. It only made loans to government and to commercial banks. It held the nation's gold reserves and regulated the flow of money in the form of the bank notes -- still theoretically redeemable for gold at this time.

Today, operating as it does as the bankers' bank, it is to the commercial banks (ie the High Street banks) what the commercial banks are to the public.

Just as we may deposit money with commercial banks, so commercial banks in turn keep deposits with the Bank of England. The amount of cash that a commercial bank can buy up from the Bank of England to meet its customers' cash withdrawals is limited to the amount of deposits it has in its account at the Bank of England and/or what it can borrow from the Bank of England or from other banks.

Commercial banks borrow from the Bank of England in exactly the same way that individuals and businesses borrow from commercial banks.

Nationalising the Bank of England in 1946, which might seem at first sight to be a far reaching measure, made little difference in practice.

Yet, the state did acquire all the shares in the Bank of England -- they now belong to the Treasury and are held in trust by the Treasury Solicitor.

However, the government had no money to pay for the shares, so instead of receiving money for their shares, the shareholders were issued with government stocks. Although the state now received the operating profits of the bank, this was offset by the fact that the government now had to pay interest on the new stocks it had issued to pay for the shares.

However, it is much more significant to note that whilst the Bank of England is now state-owned the fact is that our money supply is once again almost entirely in private hands, with 97% of it being in the form of interest bearing loans of one sort or another, created by private commercial banks.

Indeed this is now where the real power resides -- with commercial banking.

The Bank of England is now essentially a regulatory body that supports and oversees the existing system. It is sometimes referred to as "the lender of last resort" in so far as one of its functions as the bankers' bank is to support any bank or financial institution that gets into difficulties and suffers a run on its liquid assets. In these circumstances, it is not obliged to disclose details of any such measures, the reason being so as to avoid a crisis in confidence -- confidence being something on which the current system is very dependant.

However beyond that, it is no longer a major player in the lending/money creation market. Its annual accounts reveal that its loans and profits are only a fraction of those of a major commercial bank such as Barclays, and it only holds a very small amount of government stocks, so it is no longer really lending to government either -- that function has largely passed to the merchant banks.

Most of its profits come from what is known as the "issue department" -- the department of the bank which is responsible for printing and distributing bank notes and coins. These are purchased by the high street banks to meet their customers' demands for cash and the various banks have their accounts at the Bank of England debited accordingly. Basically, the profits from this operation belong to the state and are transferred to the Treasury, thus being added to the public purse.

Nevertheless, although owned by the state, the bank is largely controlled and run by those from the world of commercial banking and conventional economics. The members of the Court of Directors, who set policy and oversee its functions, are drawn almost entirely from the world of banks, insurance, economists and big business.

On the other hand, the responsibility for setting interest rates and controlling money supply has always remained with bankers and economists through the Monetary Policy Committee headed by the Governor and the two Deputy Governors.

The day to day management and running of the bank is in the hands of a team of professional managers headed by the Governor, the Deputy Governors and four Executive Directors.

From 1946 to 1997 many decisions, especially those relating to interest rates, were made jointly by the Treasury and the Bank, but of course Treasury officials and the Chancellor of the Exchequer and other treasury ministers frequently have close ties with the world of commercial banking. Since May 1997, the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee has had exclusive control over setting interest rates -- although it still takes into account government inflation targets in reaching its decisions.

It can be noted that the formal removal of the Treasury from this decision making process was an essential step prior to incorporating the Bank of England into the European System of Central Banks under the control of the European Central Bank -- which is what would happen should Britain enter Economic and Monetary Union and replace the Pound with the Euro.

Please print out, photocopy and distribute these articles. Also copy and paste them to emails, and circulate widely, and please include all the essential contact information below. Thank you.

Essential Further Reading:
PROSPERITY: Freedom from Debt Slavery
is a 4-page quarterly Journal which campaigns for publicly-created debt-free money. PROSPERITY is edited and published by Alistair McConnachie and a 4-issue subscription is available for £10 payable to PROSPERITY at 268 Bath Street, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, G2 4JR. Tel: 0141 332 2214; Fax: 0141 353 6900, Email: contactus AT ProsperityUK DOT com http://www.ProsperityUK.com All back-issues are still available. The 40-page Report, Clarifying our Money Reform Proposals, launched at the 2006 Bromsgrove Conference, is available for £10 payable to PROSPERITY and is essential reading for beginners."

http://www.prosperityuk.com/prosperity/articles/boe1.html

This part may be significant:

"Indeed this is now where the real power resides -- with commercial banking.

The Bank of England is now essentially a regulatory body that supports and oversees the existing system. It is sometimes referred to as "the lender of last resort" in so far as one of its functions as the bankers' bank is to support any bank or financial institution that gets into difficulties and suffers a run on its liquid assets. In these circumstances, it is not obliged to disclose details of any such measures, the reason being so as to avoid a crisis in confidence -- confidence being something on which the current system is very dependant.

Harry makes this valuable point in the comments of the last blog:

"A few of the questions that need asking are why do private commercial banks create our money supply and have so much influence over decisions that affect our economy"

It seems to me that the Bank of England may be perceived as the crooked policeman who turns a blind eye to the forger's printing press in the basement. What seems worthy of scrutiny is the relationship between the Bank Of England's directors and the the commercial banks. Clearly the BoE is important in terms of "regulation". So being a stockholder/director in the BoE seems to give power over regulation rather than power through the immediate gathering of "interest on debt".

I would speculate that the BoE's directors have substantial shares in the commercial banks. That's where some digging needs to take place.

The linked article points out that the Bank Of England is to the High Street Banks what the High Street Banks are to us. Since we have a fractional reserve banking system ie more money lent out than their are deposits the vaults, then why can't I as an individual borrow £1000 from Barclay's, get a pressing press and then lend out £10,000 (at interest) to people I know ? A silly question, but what essentially is the difference between Barclay's and my piggy bank ?

Correspondence With The Bank Of England And Others Part 2

2008-10-09T09:12:00.000-07:00

Correspondence With The Bank Of England And Others - Part 2

Following on from:
http://nationalisttruth1.blogspot.com/2008/09/correspondence-with-bank-of-england-and.html

The Bank Of England had informed me that the list of it's stockholders is held by a company called "Computershare". Here I give the exchange of emails. Sometimes a negative result is still a result. Lack of transparency, whether in a fishing club, small political party or national institution, surely must be a cause of concern ?

The email exchanges with Computershare:

"Hello,
I was given your contact details by enquiries at the Bank of England.

I'm interested in

'3% Treasury Stock, 1966 or after'. ie The former stockholders. Is it possible to find out who these people are please ? Thanks
Bill
;-) "

"

The British Government Stock Register is not open for public inspection,

and the names of the stockholders remain private.

While we can deal with enquiries from stockholders, or their descendants, specific information would need to be provided. We do not provide lists of stockholders (current of past).

Regards

Carol White
Computershare
Gilts Relationship Manager > Client Services
gilts@computershare.co.uk
T +44 (0)870 703 0143 F +44 (0)870 703 0352"

"Thanks.

Is it possible to buy this stock ? Does it come up for sale very often ?

Bill"

"Bill

The amount of stock in issue for 3% Treasury Stock is relatively small as such is not always available to purchase. It is one of several stocks which are referred to as "RUMP" stocks.

For this reason it is not a stock which is offered for Sale through the UK Debt Management Office Purchase and Sale Service, which we manage on their behalf. A List of Available Stocks, together with the forms to become a member of the Approved Group of Investors, which is a pre-requisite use this service are available on our website
https://www-uk.computershare.com/investor/gilts/default.asp?cc=uk&lang=e
n&bhjs=1&fla=1&theme=cpu .

Alternatively it may be possible to purchase the 3% Treasury Stock through the market, in this instance you should contact your bank or stockbroker.

Regards
Carol White
Computershare
Gilts Relationship Manager > Client Services
gilts@computershare.co.uk
T +44 (0)870 703 0143 F +44 (0)870 703 0352
The Pavilions, Bridgwater Road, Bristol BS13 8AE, United Kingdom
www.computershare.com"

"Thanks for that Carol,

what about the other stock, ie other than 3 1/2 % that makes up that which is associated with the Bank of England ? (Is it all called Treasury Stock ? and from what date was it available ? (1946 ?) and what do you think is the total valuation of Treasury Stock ?

Cheers and thanks for dealing with an awkward customer like myself :-)

Bill

:-) "

"
Bill

Attached is the list of available stocks - since there are a variety to choose from.

regarding your further questions regarding stocks in general, probably the best place to have a look at is the UK Debt Management Office website www.dmo.gov.uk

There is a wide range of information available on this site regarding gilts stocks, (both historical and current) including amounts in issue, and indications of recent prices.

Regards

Carol"

More next week. Hopefully this might be of interest to some.

Billy Wasn't A Hero

2008-10-07T13:54:00.000-07:00

"WILLIAM STADHOLDER, a Dutch army careerist, was a handsome chap with money problems. The Jews saw another opportunity and through their influence arranged for William’s elevation to Captain General of the Dutch Forces. The next step up the ladder for William was his elevation by the Jews to the aristocratic title of William, Prince of Orange.

The Jews then arranged a meeting between William and Mary, the eldest daughter of the Duke of York. The Duke was only one place removed from becoming King of England. In 1677 Princess Mary of England married William Prince of Orange. To place William upon the throne of England it was necessary to get rid of both Charles II and the Duke of York who was slated to become James II of the Stuarts. It is important to note that none of the Stuarts would grant charter for an English national bank. That is why murder, civil war, and religious conflicts plagued their reigns by the Jewish bankers.

In 1685, King Charles II died and the Duke of York became King James II of England. In 1688 the Jews ordered William Prince of Orange to land in England at Torbay. Because of an ongoing Campaign of L’Infamie against King James II contrived by the Jews, he abdicated and fled to France. William of Orange and Mary were proclaimed King and Queen of England.

The new King William III soon got England involved in costly wars against Catholic France which put England deep into debt. Here was the Jewish bankers’ chance to collect. So King William, under orders from the Elders of Zion in Amsterdam, persuaded the British Treasury to borrow 1.25 million pounds sterling from the Jewish bankers who had helped him to the throne.

Since the state’s debts had risen dramatically, the government had no choice but to accept. But there were conditions attached: The names of the lenders were to be kept secret and that they be granted a Charter to establish a Central Bank of England. Parliament accepted and the Jewish bankers sunk their tentacles into Great Britain."

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=86

....and the rest is history .....

The Federal Reserve: The Greatest Scam In History?

2008-10-05T02:01:00.000-07:00

We could say the same about the "our" equivalent, the Bank Of England. Sadly there have been no serious published researchers focusing on just the Bank Of England, apart from Establishment sycophants.

We need a British Eustace Mullins or G Edward Griffin. Their respective works are "The Secrets Of The Federal Reserve" and "The Creature From Jekyll Island". The former is the pioneering work and the latter is very good at explaining the central banking process by which a government on behalf of the people pays interest on the money that the PRIVATELY OWNED CENTRAL BANK "lends" it. "Lends" is a misnomer, because money is just literally printed. Forgers get long prison sentences ! This interest paid comes from the taxpayer. It is usually reckoned that the average worker pay taxes to the tune of half his income. In other words, half the year we are working for the government !

Here is a well written , understandable article about the Federal Reserve. The author recommends a return to a precious metal standard. I am undecided on this point because there are arguments for a government issuing (interest free !) money based on the nation's production:

"The Federal Reserve: The Greatest Scam In History?
13th August 2007

The Federal Reserve was created in 1913-1914 in order to bring stability to the economy and yet almost every major crash, including the great depression, can be attributed to the Federal Reserve.

We are going to take a look at the history of the Fed and what prominent historical figures have said about the organisation.

Firstly, from 1837-1862 there was a system of national banks in the USA but then in 1913-1914 a consortium of 12 privately held banks got together and formed the Federal Reserve Bank, an entity that is not part of the US government. These banks then purchased notes from the US Mint for printing costs and lent them out through member banks charging interest.

The Federal Reserve came into being after its supporters paid for the Presidential campaign of US President Woodrow Wilson. Wilson signed the bill that transferred the US currency to twelve regional private banks Wilson regretted his decision later saying:

“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”

In 1933 President Roosevelt confiscated citizens gold and handed it to the Federal Reserve. At the very moment when Americans have needed to protect their wealth the most, the best store of wealth ever created, gold, was confiscated from American citizens and given to a un-elected conglomerate of private banks.

When the bill for the Federal Reserve was being considered, some brave politicians spoke out against its creation calling it “the strangest, most dangerous advantage ever placed in the hands of a special privilege class by any Government that ever existed” and Congressman Victor Murdock said, “I do not blind myself to the fact that this measure will not be effectual as a remedy for a great national evil – the concentrated control of credit.”

It even appears that one of the most important and most respected figures in American history disagrees with the Federal Reserve saying, “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Jefferson also said, “I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies”
“Paper is poverty… it is only the ghost of money, and not money itself.”

The Federal Reserve make no secret about the scam they are running as the Boston section of the Federal Reserve Bank said:
“When you or I write a check there must be sufficient funds in our account to cover the cheque, but when the Federal Reserve writes a check there is no bank deposit on which that cheque is drawn. When the Federal Reserve writes a cheque, it is creating money.”

Perhaps the Fed can create money, but we strongly believe that wealth cannot be created. Wealth is simply transferred, it is not created and we challenge anyone to prove otherwise. The only time wealth was created was when the world was created, with all its resources, true wealth. So why hasn’t the Federal Reserve been disbanded?

Well as the Rothschild Brothers of London said in 1863; “The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it’s profits or so dependant on it’s favours, that there will be no opposition from that class.”

The great Henry Ford once said “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”

The problem is, very few people understand the system at all. It is not taught in schools and even some of the most prominent financial analysts and fund managers really have no idea how the system works. They tend to define inflation as rising prices when in fact inflation occurs because of the expansion of the money supply. Or even link inflation with the economy doing well, saying, “we should raise interest rates as the economy did extremely well this month and we don’t want inflation getting out of hand”, or words to that effect.

What all people, not just investors, need to understand is that paper money is worthless. Gold and precious metals are the real money, the real wealth that cannot be created like its paper ghost."

Commentary On The Fredrick Toben Persecution

2008-10-04T03:26:00.000-07:00

Extradite Toben, Declare Total War on Michael James

By Michael James in Germany – 4 October 2008

"Fredrick Toben, one of Australia's most upright, respected and renommiert historians, has indecently been illegally arrested by a sycophantic police force who once swore loyalty to the Queen and were legally committed to the protection and upholding of the law of the land and the defence of every citizen of the British Commonwealth against the abusive crimes of foreign states gone mad.

Robert Peel, the founder of the British constabulary must be spinning in his grave. That a patriotic citizen of the British Commonwealth, who fought the Jewish-backed Marxists in Rhodesia, can be delivered, hand, stock and barrel to the enemies of mankind, the treacherous European Ashkenazi Jewry, must turn the guts of every freeborn Englishmen. I vomit in disgust.

Fredrick Toben is one of the most respected and esteemed historians in the western world. His crime: He has seriously posited exceedingly intelligent questions about the accuracy of the so-called number of Jews alleged to have perished at the hands of the patriotic Hitler regime. His “thought crimes” pale into insignificance with mine; for although I live and write in Germany, and have fearsomely researched this topic more thoroughly than any existing writer living in the "safelands", I can absolutely and with no doubt in my mind say that there was no systematic murder of the "Jews" as outlined in the post 1970s hysteria propagated by fat overpaid Hollywood moguls such a Stephen Spielberg.

I openly deny the holocaust narrative in the heart of Germany; yet not one lawyer has hairs enough on his testicles to arrest me because I would make a Socratic laughing stock out these anti-German, anti-Christ traitors in court.

The holocaust (Shoa) is a fraud designed to benefit and legitimise the illegal existence of the bandit Zionist state of Israel. I have written plenty of articles that have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Shoah is a Kabbalistic fairy tale of epic proportions. I have been prosecuted by the Central Council of Jews in Germany for having exposed them as a bunch of scum-ridden liars, and yet the Senior State Attorney has vindicated my argument. The establishment knows that I'm telling the truth.

The Jews are playing twisted chess with us. We can play three-dimensional chess. They get lost somewhere in the forth dimension and blame it on our ignorance. Funny thing is, they can't play fifth-dimensional chess. I can. They can't. In anger, they tip the table. They’re not as smart as they think.

The fact is. The so-called “holocaust” is an “Alice in Wonderland” rip-off, replete with Anne Franks who write sob stories with ballpoint-pens that were not manufactured until the 1950s. It represents nothing more than a vast moneymaking machine. They have screwed us backwards, forwards and every time we open our mouths.

No Jew living today can prove conclusively that the gas chambers ever existed. They served only as delousing clinics. The seminal testimony “Sachenshausen-Workauta” (banned in Germany) proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the "gas chambers" were created as tourist attractions in 1948. There exists not one eyewitness testimony to the death of a Jew in any so-called "gas chamber". That is an historical fact. Call me on it. Nobody can ever prove me wrong.

The true facts are this. Hitler gave explicit orders, in line with both his own Cadre and the Zionist Party of Germany, to intern Jewish people only for the purpose of producing war armaments. In Auschwitz and elsewhere, they were paid a decent wage, were fed adequately (as millions of Germans starved to death) and were given access to all the machinery needed to defeat to the allied advance. Some Jews lived for and prayed for the victory of the USSSR. Many supported Hitler. The agreement was that that loyal Jews would soon obtain their own homeland, probably in Madagascar.

The fact that the Jewish population exploded by an incredible 1.3 million between 1937 and 1947 is something willingly admitted by the Jewish Bureau of Statistics and the Red Cross, but cannily overlooked by hooked-nosed historians with their beady snouts in the trough of high finance. Not even Churchill, a half-Jew, mentioned this so-called "atrocious crime" against his own people.

Guess why? It never happened. The fact is, if you were a Jew during the Second World War (which was only an extension of the first world war in which International World Jewry declared “Germany Must Perish!”), you probably never had it so good. Certainly you were not amongst the 60 million European Christians who slaughtered themselves in an intractable bloodbath to fatten out your investments war dividends on Wall Street.

The British authorities have no right to arrest and detain Fredrick Toben. The so-called European Warrant of Arrest is laughably illegal, for several reasons: it contravenes UK law; the Zionist European Union is illegal, became jurisdictionally illegal because the Federal Republic of Germany itself was an illegitimate corporation at its inception and had no right to sign the Treaty of Rome; the Zionist BRD became officially defunct in September 1990 upon reunification and has no right to try citizens subject to the post-war SHAEF laws, of which Australia was a signatory.

Do you want me to continue? Oh, boy, I can give Mr Toben's lawyer a list that put will put Mrs Merkel and her Zionist hook-nosed snout-pigs in the position of shelf-fillers at a local Aldi store.

Lay one finger on Fredrick Toben, and you got to war with Michael James. I am a man of no means and weak of health, but I shall walk all the way to Mannheim to defend him and bring the illicit German government to heel. I never lose any battle I fight.

I relish this contest. Bring it on, Mrs Zypries (or is it Ms. Zypries?) Bring Mr Toben to Germany and I shall destroy the illegal Federal Republic of Germany.

And the European Union too.

---------------
Mike James, an Englishman, is a former freelance journalist resident in Germany since 1992 with additional long-haul stays in East Africa, Poland and Switzerland. He is committed to national revolutionary change in Germany and England."

http://thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=9451

The Thin End Of The Wedge

2008-10-01T14:27:00.000-07:00

Britain was once regarded as a refuge for political and other dissidents. I just can't believe how bad things have got. I remember growing up with the media's self righteous criticism of the Soviet Union and others. I find this a sickening indictment of how low Britain has sunk. What we are seeing is the emergence of a new religion that can't be questioned.

"AUSTRALIAN Holocaust revisionist Gerald Fredrick Toben has been arrested at London's Heathrow airport.

British police executed a European Union arrest warrant issued by German authorities at Heathrow late last night Melbourne time.

The arrest warrant accuses 64-year-old Toben of publishing material on the internet "of an anti-Semitic and/or revisionist nature" in Australia, Germany and other countries.

The alleged Holocaust denier was to appear later at the City of Westminster Magistrates Court.

Toben, a former teacher in Victoria, has been involved in lengthy court proceedings in Australia for allegedly denying the Holocaust, and was jailed in Germany in 1999."

http://www.theage.com.au/national/holocaust-denier-arrested-20081002-4s58.html

Correspondence With The Bank Of England And Others

2008-09-30T03:06:00.000-07:00

Correspondence With The Bank Of England And Others - Part One

For the benefit of future researchers I would like to list a few emails I sent and received from the Bank of England and related bodies. This shows me trying to get information on whom the share/stock holders are. I hope this might be of interest and inspire others to do some digging around. I used the name "Bill Cooper" rather than my own in case my name was doing the rounds as a "troublemaker" :-) The exchanges took place in January 2008

"Hello,
Could you tell me who are the shareholders in the Bank Of England please ?
Thanks
Bill "

"

Dear Bill

Thanks for your email. The Bank of England is the central bank of the whole of the UK and was established as a corporate body by Royal Charter under the Bank of England Act 1694. The Bank was nationalised on 1 March 1946, and gained operational independence to set interest rates in 1997 (The Bank of England Act 1998 Part II sets out the responsibilities and objectives of the Bank in relation to monetary policy.) The Bank is a public sector institution wholly-owned by the government - the entire capital of the Bank is, in fact, held by the Treasury solicitor on behalf of HM Treasury. Each year, the Bank is required to submit its Report and Accounts to Parliament, via the Chancellor of the Exchequer which you may be interested to read. The latest 'Annual Report and Accounts' can be found on our website at:

www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/annualreport/index.htm

I hope you find the above information useful.

Kind Regards
Wendy Galvin"

"Thanks Wendy,

I notice that under the 1946 Act, people with existing stock were given
government stock which presumably still bears interest ? Is there a
register etc of people who still receive the 3 % interest.

Thanks

Bill"

"Dear Bill

Yes you are quite right that the Bank's shareholders at the time of nationalisation in 1946 were allocated an amount of stock created by HM Treasury for the purpose, known as '3% Treasury Stock, 1966 or after'.

Unfortunately I am unable to provide you with any information on the current stockholders as responsibility for stock registration services was transferred from the Bank of England to a commercial company called Computershare in 2004. You could approach them directly with your enquiry. Their contact details are:

Computershare Investor Services PLC
P.O. Box 2411
The Pavilions
Bridgewater Road
Bristol BS99 6WX

General Queries Helpline: 0870 703 0143
Fax: 0870 703 0352
Website: www.computershare.com/uk/investor/gilts
Email: Gilts@computershare.co.uk

Kind Regards
Wendy Galvin

Public Information and Enquiries Group"

"Thanks again for the info....

You have provided many links, including links to accounts. Could you
point me in the right direction - eg which link & which page - as
regards where the

'3% Treasury Stock, 1966 or after' stockholders interest/dividend etc appears in the accounts please ?

Cheers

Bill

;-) "

"Hello again Bill

The link to the Bank of England Report and Accounts was provided purely for your interest, there is no reference relating to '3% Treasury Stock 1966, or after' within this report.

As I explained in my previous email, the Bank no longer holds any information relating to the administration of '3% Treasury Stock 1966, or after' - you will need to contact Computershare using the contact details provided below.

Kind Regards
Wendy Galvin"

More next week.....

The Steel Cores Of WTC 1 and WTC2

2008-09-29T06:25:00.000-07:00

"COMMENT FOR PUBLICATION - POST WHERE NEEDED

by Walter Burien - 08/23/08
http://CAFR1.com

I was a tenant at WTC1 from 1978 to 1980. The ONLY issue people should focus on as the "key issue" is: When the towers were proposed for construction, many New Yorkers were concerned that if the towers fell, they could take-out twenty or thirty other buildings. So, with that in mind the towers were built around a steel "center" grouping of massive steel support columns that in the unlikely event the towers were going down, the floors would pancake on each other straight down around the steel center core. The towers were built to do that.

Here is the key to it all: As designed and in the event of a collapse, the steel cores of WTC1 and WTC2 would be LEFT STANDING. There is NO WAY in hell the center core would come down unless it was demolished level by level to fall with the collapsing floors. No ifs; and; or buts! End of story! Period!

I am really getting tiered of watching people being played for idiots in propaganda plays to confuse valid; indisputable; facts.

This ONE FACT brought forward here is indisputable. It establishes the towers steel center core was demolished to drop with the collapsing floors. The design would have left the steel core intact in the event of collapse.

If you let someone drag you off to speculation and theories it is very counterproductive to the sniper bullet kill shot! The clowns (on the inside) that pulled this off have been laughing all the way to the bank each and every day since September of 2001 without any consequence.

Let this ONE POINT take em down... Make it the key circulating fact across the globe!

There are many other issues that are valid, but none greater than this one fact and this one fact is incorporated into the original design of the towers there for all to see.

It is time that the crap that pulled this off that have laughed all the way up until 2008 gets their asses drug out of their offices and dealt with accordingly.

Who set up the demolition in advance of WTC 1, 2, and 7?

This is NOT an "if" question, it is "A FACT OF OCCURRENCE" to be answered. Get the people that set the demolition and let the last words out of their mouths be who instructed them to do it.

Walter Burien
Prior tenant WTC1 Suite 2743"

Let's Talk About The Banking Mechanism

2008-09-28T08:12:00.000-07:00

Clicking on diagram will make it clearer :-)

Let’s discuss the banking mechanism. Not the history or owns the banks or generalities. Let's get down to the nitty gritty and try and gets to grips with the jargon and what's really going on. I'm sure I'm not on my own when I hear various talking heads bandying around various terms that we don't fully understand.

I scribbled the above. There are six entities for the purposes of discussion. The Bank of England (BoE), the government/treasury, High St Bank A, High St Bank B, Customer 1 and Customer 2.

In so far I understand "banking", it would be because of G Edward Griffin's "The Creature From Jekyll Island". Thanks to John In Basel for giving me these links which I'm now trying to understand :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_funds_rate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_market_operations

Some Observations On Terminology And Struggling To Understand The Subject

All of us have to fight and try and understand what is meant by particular terms. There are several reasons for confusion:

1/ Because we just simply don't understand a word/ term/concept

2/ Confusion between American and English terminology. American writers have been more prolific, at least in attempting to convey to "ordinary" people what central banking is all about. Consequently we have much more American material. Their central bank is the Federal Reserve. "Ours" is the Bank Of England (BoE)

3/ A sort of deliberate presentation of the subject in a way that leaves us feeling the subject should be "left to the 'experts'". I think the mass media do mass mind numbing on purpose, despite the number of talking heads, graphs, mentions of millions/billions of pounds and political puppets paraded before is who don't really understand what is really going on...

4/ People who really benefit from the system get paid/benefit from it. "Hostile" commentators such as myself don't get "paid" for criticising. I think this is well illustrated by :

“It [Central Bank] gives the National Bank almost complete control of national finance. Those few who understand the system [check book money and credit] will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependant on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of the people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burden without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical [contrary] to their interests.” - Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863

The "achievement" of "socialism" (a term that should be qualified) has been to extend the beneficiaries of the system sufficiently so as to buy votes of two wolves at the expense of one sheep. That's why IMO the system is currently imploding....

But back to the diagram I scribbled above....

I could/should have drawn another bubble that said Public Sector from to which I would have put an arrow coming from the Government Treasury.

I think understand that the BoE "buys" "securities" from the treasury. Along with printed paper or more to the point, electronic transactions, the government effectively exchanges paper for paper BUT THE GOVERNMENT ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE UNDERTAKES THE PAYMENT OF INTEREST TO THE PRIVATELY OWNED BoE (The so called BoE nationalistion of 1946 was a sham that didn't change anything.) The National Debt, I understand is what has arisen from the incorporation of the BoE in 1694.

I HAVE DONE A LITTLE RESEARCH AND HAVE HIT A BRICK WALL IN KNOWING WHO OWNS STOCK/SHARES IN THE BANK OF ENGLAND. THE QUEEN WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY BY A HUGE STOCKHOLDER, BUT HER HOLDING ARE HIDDEN FROM PRIVATE VIEW. THE ROTHSCHILD'S OBVIOUSLY DO ! So, any huge projects requiring vast public spending may superficially look like they are benefiting the people but they are adding to the national debt and benefiting those BoE stockholders hidden from view. What gives a Satanic hue to all of this is that war benefits the central bankers. Eustace Mullins the first modern researcher to blow the whistle on the Central Banking fraud wrote that he believed Edith Cavell, the World War I nurse executed by the Germans and who thereafter became a martyr, had discovered that relief for Belgium was actually being channeled to Germany to keep the game (ie World War I) going longer !...BTW The Kaiser's banker Max Warburg was the brother of the Federal Reserve's Paul Warburg

What I'm Trying To Understand

Now, I'm thinking aloud. I don't think I understand the mechanism involving the High St Bank's (HStBs) lending between themselves and money they borrow from the Bank Of England. I INVITE COMMENT, CONTRADICTION AND CLARIFICATION.

The HStBs borrow money from the BoE at the "discount rate" (is that right ?) My understanding is that HStBs have to something like 10 % of the total money they lend to customers. As part of their so called "reserves" (apparently just bits of paper) my current understanding is that government securities can be held (comments please ?)

So, thinking aloud again. Since the Bank Of England can "print as much paper" (ie credit computers with certain numbers) as it wants, why can't it just "credit" HStBs with what ever they want, since that would mean more interest to the BoE, wouldn't it ? I'm sort of aware that this is inflationary and kind of thinking that since money is literally no object for a fiat system, (A fiat system is one where pounds/dollars etc don't have a corresponding precious metal to be exchanged for), but I'm trying to get to grips with the mechanism rather than the morality/politics of it.

Something else. No doubt HStBs provide published accounts for shareholders. Banks have profits based on interest from customers. What about accounts etc that show the profits of the BoE who lend to the HStBs and the Government (more properly the "people") ?

I'm going to take a look at those Wiki links and then post in the comments section. Please join me and help educate us all :-)

Evaluating "Conspiracy Theories"

2008-09-27T16:59:00.000-07:00

I came across this description of what constitutes "conspiracy" some time ago on the "In Plane Site" video, about the September 11th attacks.

Enemies of truth have many different loaded terms for preserving the existing political order. I am strong believer in asking those who accuse, using terms like "racist", "fascist", "conspiracy theorist" and many many other terms what they actually mean by the words they use:

"Many readers are naturally be inclined to gravitate toward the former when confronted with ideas considered "outside the box", therefore it is necessary to define the phrase "conspiracy theory".

The term "conspiracy theory" consists of two words, the active word being "theory". By definition, a theory is a concept, an idea, a proposal, a supposition. Example: "In theory, if I purchase a raffle ticket, I could win the prize." However, once the first ticket is purchased, winning is no longer a theory, but rather a possibility. The more tickets that are purchased, the more possible and eventually probable the win becomes. The same can be said about a conspiracy theory. As long as there is no evidence to support the conspiracy theory, it remains a theory. Once however there is one piece of evidence to support the theory, no matter how flimsy or circumstantial it may be, the conspiracy is no longer a theory, but a possibility! And the more evidence there is that is gathered, the more possible and eventually probable the conspiracy becomes."

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-Jews/+Doc-Jews-911/911PentagonStoryIsFalse.htm

Clause 8A-4 And The Abolition Of Britain

2008-09-27T04:00:00.000-07:00

From the British Free Press, January 2008. It makes some rather strong claims:

"Next month our 646 MPs begin debating the Reform Treaty. It seems 375 MPs will vote to abolish Britain, with about 271 against.

The Treaty provides for the European Union to take over as a dictatorship on the 1st January 2009. If passed the Treaty will overrule the British Constitution, which will become worthless; Westminster will then be powerless. This sixth and final Treaty gives the EU absolute power, and it will almost certainly use it to close our Parliament on 5th May 2010. Westminster’s five year term expires on that date; the Reform Treaty does not make provision for a British General Election, and can be used to prevent it. The EU has always planned to control Britain directly through the 12 regional capitals, bypassing Parliament.

It will be devastating for the City of Westminster; thousands of jobs which depend on Parliament will go. MPs will lose their £240,000 pa salary and expenses.Mark Field, Westminster’s MP, one of the few who know the truth. He plans to go back to industry when Parliament closes. Article 2 clause 4 of this ‘Lisbon Treaty’can be used to force us into the Euro.

Selection of pro-EU MPs
Over the last 35 years 25,000 corrupt pro-EU officials have been moved up into senior posts in all parts of our government and the judiciary; that included most of our MPs. “Party lists” were used to manoeuvre the wrong people into power. Illegally they do not represent us, but instead implement EU policy.

Our Labour, Conservative and Lib Dem parties are finished: not only are their leaderships already controlled by the EU, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, a ruthless communist and the EU’s visible enforcer, has made it clear there are to be no more referendums or elections. Article 8A clause 4 will be used to shut our parties down. MPs are breaking the law and committing treason by abolishing our nation, but they are now used to that.

Bribery
Many MPs are on, or have been promised a place on, the EU gravy train. Massive corruption and blatant bribery have always been the EU’s method. Some MPs are taken in by the government’s £100 million disinformation programme (revealed in released classified document FCO 26/1212), to deceive us about the EU takeover. Portcullis House, one of scores of Westminster buildings that will become vacant after Parliament closes

The EU advances by secrecy and stealth, and a majority of these MPs still don’t know that by voting for the Reform Treaty they are voting for their own abolition. But leave your MP in no doubt that the six treaties build a dictatorship. It has the laws of a police state"

http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:VSdAyix8Xh8J:www.logiclaw.co.uk/BPFP.pdf+clause+8A-4&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=uk

Here is the Lisbon Treaty:
http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/pdf1/lisbon-treaty

Perhaps someone could have a look through this 294 page monster and see if the above article is a true representation ?

The Money Masters

2008-09-23T17:17:00.000-07:00

On talk radio today I heard one idiot suggest that the neo con radio host, who possesses a degree in drama and bullshit, should be our PM. No doubt believing that prime minsters actually have a mind of their own. Today the fat goldfish himself was posturing in front of the theatre company known as the "Labour Party" .

The fat goldfish has a wife of not unpleasant appearence. Why a woman would marry such a poor excuse for a man, I don't know. During his speech I heard him mention that an "achievement" of the "Labour" government was the "independence" of the Bank Of England.

Political parties DO NOT RUN THIS COUNTRY or any other major Western power.

This video has been linked to before. It's a cracker:

A Major Breakthrough In Physics ?

2008-09-22T06:50:00.000-07:00

Theoretical physics, which contains such grandiose sounding terms like "Special Relativity" and "Quantum Mechanics" might be undergoing a major paradigm shift.

Albert Einstein's most famous theories : "Special Relativity" and "General Relativity" which sought to describe the physics of large and fast objects, for a long time were at odds with "Quantum Mechanics" which sought a description of the very small. An attempted unification of the two into "Relativistic Quantum Mechanics" sounds good for impressing people in the pub but in truth, escapes the intellects of 99 % of us, including yours truly despite nominally studying it some time ago. :-)

There have been many fanciful models of how physical reality is put together. According to the "String Theorists", space time and matter is made up of "pieces of string" that require ten or eleven dimensions. Many in the science community have asked the question "Is the universe that complex ?" There has been a sense that mathematical physicists had become the modern equivalents of the medieval clerics who argued over the number of angels you could balance on a pinhead. Mathematical cleverness had become more important than trying to explain reality as simply as possible in terms of observations. The mathematics of mathematical physics had become the master rather than the servant.

There are four forces in nature: Strong Nuclear, Weak Nuclear, Electromagnetic and Gravity.
Theoreticians have sought to unify these forces behind a common theory. The first three forces can described by Quantum Mechanics and gravity by General Relativity.

A Welsh academic by the name of Myron Evans, has suggested that Gravity which can be explained by the curvature of space, according to Einstein, has its counterpart in the electromagnetic force which is mediated by the torsion of space. In other words all forces and particles of nature arise out of the geometry ! Euclid would be pleased and Einstein with his famous criticism of Quantum Mechanic's and it's statistical view of the world "God does not play dice" would also be vindicated !

Evans claims that his theories make falsifiable predictions, a condition for real scientific theories, and explains old data in a way that standard models of physics don't.

I don't pretend to understand most of what this fella is saying. He seems confident and has his supporters. Myron Evans also believes that the "Big Bang" is busted (as do I for what it's worth) and seems to show that the "Red Shift" that was once regarded as an indicator of the universe's expansion can be explained in a more satisfactory way.

http://www.aias.us/

Your Opinions On Policy Please

2008-09-20T08:01:00.001-07:00

What six policies should form the backbone of a Nationalist party's stance ?

No reason to choose six in particular, but it's a small number without being too small....

My choice would be in no particular order:

1/ Zero immigration
2/ Get out of Europe
3/ Reform of banking and tax system
4/ Development of alternative energy and technology
5/ Decoupling of the media from solely serving the interests of Big Business
6/ Abolition of the monarchy and the formation of a republic

Anyone Remember Kondratieff's Longwave Theory ?

2008-09-18T13:59:00.000-07:00

In the early nineties I remember reading a book about Kondratieff's theory of sixty year business cycles. I think he called it the "Longwave" . Many years later I came across the idea that that these cycles (if indeed they could be squeezed into sixty year time frames), were caused by the deliberate expansion of and contraction of credit by the central banks. An excellent video I saw on Central Banking expressed this as the "rowing of the economy". Most Anti Establishment research on this subject seems to come from the USA.

In Britain we disparately need a talented researcher/writer/filmaker to deconstruct the Bank of England - "our" Central Bank. This research would include tracking down the Bank Of England's stockholders - not easy - and also communicating what is obviously on first appearence a very a dry and boring subject, in such a way that understanding of the problem of central banking becomes as essential to Nationalists as checking tyre pressure is to the owner of someone getting their first car.

I was looking on Amazon for a second hand buy on the Kondratieff theory but most seem out of print or too expensive. I came across this review for one of the books on the subject and it made me chuckle. Remember when Decca turned down the Beatles because "Guitar groups were old hat"

"By careful study and the use of other materials which take a long cyclic view of the US and global free enterprise (socio-capitalistic) economic societies, one can understand why the US has had a protracted depression during the 1982 to 1988 period and why we are now entering a period of great prosperity and a new economic infrastructure is being built."

http://www.amazon.com/review/product/0529045613/ref=sr_1_4_cm_cr_acr_txt?_encoding=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

:-) :-)

That review was written 1998. Was he a former employee of Decca ? :-)

I don't think the sixty year cycle does exist as a definite fixed time period - although sheep can only be sheared so often and sixty years may have more to do with each generation or two learning the hard way...

The book I read on the subject, amongst other things made the assertion that during the last part of the economic long wave - when the wave was nearing the top - many scientific discoveries and technological innovations were not used until the economy of a country started the next part of the "long wave" from the "depressed" part of the wave. If this assertion is true then it may fit well with my more politically mature worldview , fifteen years later, that there is active suppression of many of these things - see my last post.

HOW AN EM CIRCUIT POWERS ITS LOAD -- AND SOLVING THE WORLD ENERGY CRISIS

2008-09-17T05:08:00.000-07:00

This is a fairly technical article, but I think the way to read it is as best as you can. I don't pretend to understand much of what Tom Bearden is saying, but believe he is on to something very important.

"HOW AN EM CIRCUIT POWERS ITS LOAD --
AND SOLVING THE WORLD ENERGY CRISIS

To: Correspondent

Thanks for all the hard work you and everyone in your organization (and your colleagues outside the organization) are doing on resolving this increasing world energy crisis. It is sorely needed, as the strike of Hurricane Ike quite vividly illustrates in its effects (thank God, not too severe!) on our oil facilities and refineries and pipelines in Texas etc.

You also need to be aware of the presently unrecognized actual cause of the present world energy crisis, since it's almost entirely unknown. The world was deliberately placed on this "eventual giant energy crisis" course just before the birth of electrical engineering, when in 1892 Lorentz was specifically elicited by J. P. Morgan's science advisors to "fix" (deliberately symmetrize) the Heaviside equations that were going to be used for the "new technology" to be called "electrical engineering" and to be taught in all our universities.

In the late 1880s Nikola Tesla -- who gave us AC power, the rotating magnetic field that made modern generators possible, radio, and many other things -- had discovered what the group symmetry specialists would call "asymmetric EM circuits". In other words, he could shuttle energy around in some of his circuits as he wished, and dissipate it where he wished. In this way, he could make a circuit that, once the source dipole and its BROKEN SYMMETRY was produced, would continually and freely radiate EM energy extracted (taken) directly from the "active medium" (Tesla's term for the "active vacuum" since special relativity, general relativity, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, gauge field theory, and quantum field theory were still unborn. Indeed, the electron had not yet even been discovered, and particle physics as we know it was unborn).
[For the proof of this "shuttling" ability by actual Tesla circuits, see T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41. Barrett shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling and storage of potentials in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis cannot reveal. He shows that Tesla’s patented circuits did exactly this. The paper is carried on the cheniere.org website at internet link http://www.cheniere.org/references/TeslaOSC.pdf . ]

One should realize that we have had group theory in our leading universities since 1870. So in 1890 Morgan had no difficulty having his science advisors (he had the best that money would buy, including Fleming in England) examine the Heaviside equations and tell him whether or not these equations still contained any of those confounded Tesla "energy from the active medium" systems -- i.e., whether they still contained asymmetric EM systems, since Maxwell's equations definitely contain both symmetrical and asymmetrical EM systems).

Their group theory analysis showed that Heaviside's original equations (already a tremendous curtailment of Maxwell's theory) were still asymmetric.

And so Morgan -- who had already conceived and was implementing a plan to utterly crush Tesla and his backer George Westinghouse -- simply directed his advisors to "Fix it!"

Lorentz was a very great scientist, but he was noted for something odd: He loved to appropriate other scientists' work and take credit for it. So "one could deal with Lorentz", in Morgan's terms. [To view a bit of this characteristic of Lorentz, see J. D. Jackson and L. B. Okun, "Historical roots of gauge invariance," Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, July 2001, p. 663-680. Jackson and Okun discuss roots and history of gauge invariance, verify that Ludwig Lorenz (without the “t”) first symmetrically regauged Maxwell's equations, although it has been misattributed to H. A. Lorentz (with the “t”) as being first. This is an excellent coverage of the history of who did what and when, and who got credit for it.]

And so they did. Lorentz simply "borrowed" (and took credit himself) Lorenz's (without the 't') previous symmetrization of those equations, and applied them. In short, he deliberately and knowingly further restricted even the original truncated Heaviside equations by symmetrizing them so that the now-symmetrized Heaviside-Lorentz equations no longer contained any asymmetric systems at all. This was just before electrical engineering was born.

And those Heaviside-Lorentz equations were then the ones used in the new technology called "electrical engineering" that was set up and gradually spread through the world's universities. All electrical engineers are still taught that horribly crippled and mangled tiny derivative of Maxwell's theory, deliberately so they will not and cannot think, conceive, develop, build and deploy ASYMMETRIC Maxwellian EM power systems (the kind of system that can deliberately accept and use excess EM energy from its local vacuum, so it can produce COP>1.0 and even self-powering where all input energy comes entirely from the vacuum interaction, and freely).

[In the hard physics literature, rigorous proof that eliminating the arbitrary Lorentz condition provides EM systems having free additional energy currents from the vacuum is given by M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., “Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum,” Physica Scripta, Vol. 61, 2000, p. 513-517.]

That way, Morgan insured that Tesla's dreams of taking all our necessary EM energy directly from the "active medium", for free, would not ever be realized. Morgan was an empire builder and a dastard, but he was a very thorough one!

Here are some direct quotes from Tesla to show what we are speaking of:

"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla, in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time].

“Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels." [Nikola Tesla].

“We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium...” [Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his epochal installation of AC generators at Niagara Falls.].

"Whatever our resources of primary energy may be in the future, we must, to be rational, obtain it without consumption of any material." [Nikola Tesla, 1900].

As you are aware, Morgan's plan did devastate George Westinghouse, Tesla's backer, who went broke and lost his company not long thereafter. It thus forced Tesla to come to him, J. P. Morgan, for the financing for his further projects. Morgan forced Tesla to sign over control (51%) of his patents, and then advanced only half the money Tesla needed -- and would not advance him any more funds thereafter. Tesla then went broke, with no control of his own patents etc., and was reduced to living in a small hotel room in New York for the rest of his life.

To see how this despaired Nikola Tesla, we quote him writing to J. P. Morgan in 1904:

“....Since a year, Mr. Morgan, there has been hardly a night when my pillow is not bathed in tears, but you must not think me a weak man for that. I am perfectly sure to finish my task, come what may. I am only sorry that after.... acquiring a special knowledge and ability which I now alone possess, and which, if applied effectively would advance the world a century, I must see my work delayed.” [Nikola Tesla, in a letter to J. P. Morgan, Oct. 13, 1904].

But before the turn of the century, Morgan had also received another shock. Two men -- simultaneously and independently -- had discovered EM energy flow through space. They were Poynting and Heaviside. Poynting never considered anything except that EM energy flow component in space outside and along the external conductors that gets diverged into the conductors to power up the electrons. But as Heaviside discovered, that is an incredibly small fraction of the overall gigantic energy flow that is actually pouring from the terminals of the generator (or any other dipolar source's broken symmetry). The remaining huge unused flow is in curled form, and so -- in any special relativistic form -- we now know it will not diverge to be used at all.

So several trillions times as much EM energy actually pours forth from the terminals of every generator and out through space outside the external conductors, as the amount of energy we crank into the generator shaft. And almost all that energy flow -- the giant Heaviside energy flow -- is just wasted and usually does not interact with anything.

When this new discovery was made known to Morgan, again he was set to fuming. He did not wish those future young electrical engineers to ever know that cranking the shaft of the generator has nothing at all to do with directly furnishing the energy to power the external circuit's loads and losses! Or to know that the generator actually pours out trillions of times more EM energy flow than the mechanical shaft rotation energy flow we input to the generator. He reasoned that, if that were made known to all the sharp young future electrical engineers, then some of them would inevitably find out how to tap some of that giant curled EM energy flow anyway, and this -- together with clamped positive energy feedback -- would lead immediately to self-powering electrical power generating systems, taking all their input energy directly from the seething vacuum (Tesla's "active medium").

And that would eliminate the tremendous and growing need for consuming fuel in order to "get our electrical power". He had watched Tesla destroy the huge financial empire he and Edison were preparing to set up with DC power, and he had no intention of letting Tesla destroy his (Morgan's) future fuel empire intentions. Morgan simply considered control of things -- people, nations, science and technology, whatever. And since the future rising need of humanity would be electrical power and such, then that need would be manipulated and controlled by the need of those systems to consume fuel. And then he who controlled the fuel would financially control the electrical power, and thus humanity itself.

So again he directed his science advisors to "Fix it!" And again Lorentz was elicited to do the dirty work.

Lorentz easily originated the clever little integration trick where one simply integrates the energy flow vector (containing both the small Poynting diverged EM flow component and the gigantic non-diverged Heaviside curled EM flow component) around a closed surface arbitrarily assumed around any volume element of interest. That neatly disposes of the giant nondivergent Heaviside energy flow component, while retaining the diverged Poynting energy flow component. This will in fact match our measured "energy collected and used in the circuit" since that energy is a priori the diverged component. Lorentz "justified" this procedure by deliberately stating that this foolish giant Heaviside energy flow component "had no physical significance".

So in 1900 Lorentz taught all our classical electrodynamicists and electrical engineers to just "integrate that pesky and bothersome huge Heaviside curled energy flow component away" and discard it quite arbitrarily. Today hardly a single EE hears of such a giant energy flow from the terminals of every generator and battery, and most certainly none of them really believe it even if they have heard its history.

And so Lorentz "fixed" the problem, and so they still do in all EE departments in every university. And they have done so for more than a century.

[But reflect a moment: In a general relativity situation, the divergence of the curl need not be completely zero after all, so in the proper GR situation one can indeed diverge (and use) a tiny bit of that giant curled Heaviside EM energy flow that accompanies every Poynting diverged flow but is unaccounted.

In optical physics since 1967 (as released by the Soviet Union) there is indeed already such a process used to tap a wee bit of that giant curled Heaviside component by indeed deliberately adding a general relativity situation -- the self-oscillation of the charged particles in the receiving section of the system, at the frequency of the input energy flow. The self-oscillating particles obviously rotate their frames to and fro a bit, thus violating special relativity a bit.
But those particular physicists are never allowed to say "excess EM energy emission", but only "negative resonance absorption of the medium" (NRAM). They are never allowed to discuss their repeated COP = 18 process when a laser input (of either IR or UV is properly used), but instead they must say only that self-oscillation "increases the reaction cross section". Any deviation from those terms and conditions will immediately result in the offending physicist losing stature, his inability to get his reports published, and will destroy his career.]
[For proof of the NRAM process, see Craig F. Bohren, "How can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it?" American Journal of Physics, 51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 323-327. Under nonlinear conditions, a particle can absorb more energy than is in the light incident on it. (Actually it can absorb more energy than is in the Poynting component incident on it). Metallic particles at ultraviolet frequencies are one class of such particles and insulating particles at infrared frequencies are another. See also H. Paul and R. Fischer, {Comment on “How can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it?’},” Am. J. Phys., 51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 327. The Bohren experiment is repeatable and produces COP = 18.]

But electrodynamicists still use Lorentz's sly statement that the giant curled Heaviside energy flow component has no physical significance. Quoting the eminent classical electrodynamicist Jackson:

"...the Poynting vector is arbitrary to the extent that the curl of any vector field can be added to it. Such an added term can, however, have no physical consequences. Hence it is customary to make the specific choice …" [J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wiley, 1975, p. 237].

Note that Jackson repeats the "logical justification" used by Lorentz. Jackson is correct in any special relativity situation (the usual case). He can be quite wrong in a proper general relativity case deliberately introduced to be able to diverge and use some of that curled EM energy flow component after all. And it that case, the diverged component of the giant Heaviside energy flow component definitely has real physical consequences.

-----------------------------------

With these two "fixes" by Lorentz, electrical engineering -- from its very birth -- has been and is deliberately restricted to only symmetrical EM systems, the ones that guarantee COP<1.0>

All EM energy in every electrical circuit is extracted directly from the vacuum via the proven asymmetry of its internal source dipolarity, once formed. Any charge, considered with its polarized vacuum of opposite sign, is also part of such a "dipolar ensemble" with concomitant broken symmetry.

Broken symmetry's giant occurrence in nature was predicted by Lee and Yang, and -- because of its revolutionary implications if true -- the experimentalists immediately leaped on it to prove it or disprove it. In Feb. 1957, Wu and her colleagues published very decisive experimental proof. Again, so great a revolution was this in physics, that with unprecedented speed the Nobel Committee awarded the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang in the same year, in Dec. 1957.

So what is so important about the broken symmetry of a dipole?

As Lee pointed out, whenever we have a broken symmetry, then something previously virtual has become observable.

Take a source dipole -- which is a proven asymmetry. Once the charges are separated to form that dipole, its broken symmetry continually absorbs virtual photon energy from the seething virtual vacuum interaction with its charges, coherently integrates that virtual energy to quantal size, and then re-emits the absorbed vacuum energy as real observable EM photons steadily pouring out from the dipole. And contrary to EE texts, this outpouring includes the necessary energy for both the accounted Poynting (divergent) energy flow component and the unaccounted nondivergent giant Heaviside energy flow component.

Every joule of observable energy in the universe comes from the source charge (and its vacuum polarization) or a source dipole. In every EM system. It always has, and it always will. We live in the midst of an incredible number of "free EM energy emitters", called "charges and dipoles", that continually extract and outpour EM energy directly from the seething vacuum.

So every EE already builds circuits that already freely extract EM energy from the vacuum -- real, observable, quanta that continuously pour out, so that the charge or dipolarity and its emitted EM energy flow form a nonequilibrium steady state (NESS) thermodynamic system. Quoting Van Flandern on the question of a static field actually being made of finer parts in continuous motion:

“To retain causality, we must distinguish two distinct meanings of the term ‘static’. One meaning is unchanging in the sense of no moving parts. The other meaning is sameness from moment to moment by continual replacement of all moving parts. We can visualize this difference by thinking of a waterfall. A frozen waterfall is static in the first sense, and a flowing waterfall is static in the second sense. Both are essentially the same at every moment, yet the latter has moving parts capable of transferring momentum, and is made of entities that propagate. …So are … fields for a rigid, stationary source frozen, or are they continually regenerated? Causality seems to require the latter.” [Tom Van Flandern, “The speed of gravity – What the experiments say,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 250, Dec. 21, 1998, p. 8-9].

Further, in modern physics a single classical charge -- e.g. an electron -- is actually composed of two infinite and opposite charges, each with infinite energy! The difference between the two infinite charges is finite, as is the energy difference between the two infinite energies. And so our instruments, peering through the external screening infinite charge and infinite energy at the bare infinite charge and infinite energy inside, see only that finite difference -- which gives the value of the "classical electron" listed in all the classical textbooks.

To see what the electron really is and really involves, however, we quote Nobelist Weinberg:

"[The total energy of the atom] depends on the bare mass and bare charge of the electron, the mass and charge that appear in the equations of the theory before we start worrying about photon emissions and reabsorptions. But free electrons as well as electrons in atoms are always emitting and reabsorbing photons that affect the electron's mass and electric charge, and so the bare mass and charge are not the same as the measured electron mass and charge that are listed in tables of elementary particles. In fact, in order to account for the observed values (which of course are finite) of the mass and charge of the electron, the bare mass and charge must themselves be infinite. The total energy of the atom is thus the sum of two terms, both infinite: the bare energy that is infinite because it depends on the infinite bare mass and charge, and the energy shift … that is infinite because it receives contributions from virtual photons of unlimited energy." [Steven Weinberg, Dreams of a Final Theory, Vintage Books, Random House, 1993, p. 109-110.].

I hope you are beginning to see just how archaic and erroneous the present day electrical engineering model and practice -- and power systems -- are. We are still applying a hoary old physics of the 1880s, that has not been modernized by anything that has happened in the entire rise of modern physics from the discovery of the electron forward.

And this is REALLY the problem generating the world's energy crisis -- the arbitrarily symmetrized EM model and systems. To show how easy it is to evoke a continuous and steady flow of EM energy that will last forever, simply lay an electret across a permanent magnet so that the E-field of the electret is at right angles to the H-field of the magnet. Then by every EM textbook in every EE department in every university, that silly two dollar gadget will sit there and freely pour out a real Poynting energy flow S, given by the simple equation S = EXH (constants of proportionality neglected).

Now of course that accounts the DIVERGED component of the flow, but it does not account the also-present giant Heaviside curled EM energy flow, which is several trillion times greater in magnitude as S. And we ourselves do not have to consume any fuel or furnish any further energy to that silly gadget, once it is simply assembled.

So there is no problem at all in evoking a "free and unending EM energy wind" anywhere in the universe, quickly and easily and for peanuts, that will also flow freely until the end of time.

Thus the only "energy" problem is how to build a proper "EM energy windmill" to sit there independently in that flowing wind, divert and collect a bit of that free energy wind and collect the energy, and then dissipate that collected EM energy SEPARATELY in the loads to power them.

You see, that type of EM system is a priori an ASYMMETRIC Maxwellian system.

And our EEs can only think, produce, and deploy a SELF-SYMMETRIZING system that uses half the "collected" energy to do nothing but destroy the source of the wind itself -- the internal source dipole inside the generator.

Again, shaft energy cranked into the generator has nothing to do with furnishing EM energy to the external loads to power them, but only with restoring the internal source dipole that the stupid circuit keeps destroying faster than it powers its loads.

Let's follow the input crankshaft mechanical energy to see that this is true.

When we crank the shaft, we start to rotate the rotor. Its rotation energy -- courtesy of Nikola Tesla -- then is transformed into internal rotating magnetic field, completely inside the generator. The rigorous definition of "work" is transformation of the form of some energy. So we have done work, but we still have the energy left, since it has remained (in its new form) inside the generator as the rotating magnetic field energy, instead of escaping from the generator system.

Then all this rotating magnetic field energy is dissipated on the internal charges inside the generator, forcing positive charges in one direction and negative in the other, and thus producing the "internal source dipole" by that separation of opposite charges. The energy also is dissipated from the generator in the process, so it escapes the system and is lost.

So that is all that the input shaft mechanical energy does. It forms the internal source dipole, and nothing else before it escapes the system.

Once formed, however, the source dipole is a proven broken symmetry (known rigorously since 1957) and as such it continually transforms virtual state energy from its vacuum interaction into real observable photon energy that pours from the terminals of the generator out along through space outside the external circuit conductors. In any special relativity situation, only the small Poynting (diverged) component enters the wires to power up the electrons.

But the electrical engineer has deliberately built a symmetrical circuit, by hooking the external current circuit (the forward emf circuit) in a closed circuit loop with the internal source dipole itself (the back emf circuit).

So half the collected EM energy is used to power the external circuit's loads and losses in the "forward emf" region of the current flow. That means that less than half is used to power the loads, since all real circuits have some losses.

The other half of the collected EM energy is expended to forcibly pump the spent electrons (in the current) back through the source dipole against its back emf, thus scattering its charges and destroying that dipole -- and thus cutting off the free extraction and flow of real EM energy from the vacuum.

So to continue furnishing its energy flow from the vacuum and out of its terminals, the system has to continually have its internal source dipole restored because the symmetrized circuit is continually and forcibly destroying that source dipole. And so we have to continually crank the shaft to continually put in some more mechanical energy to continually transduce into some more rotating magnetic field energy to be continually expended in restoring the source dipole and thus sustaining the free EM energy flow from the vacuum and pouring out the generator terminals.

Even in a 100% efficient dipole-restoring input process, we would have to input as much energy as was used to destroy and scatter the dipole. That means we have to input at least half as much energy as was collected in the external circuit. And we get less than half the collected energy in the external circuit to power our loads.

It is easily seen that we thus always have to input more mechanical shaft energy than the useful energy we get out there in our loads to power them. This inane symmetrized EM circuit therefore self-enforces COP<1.0.

And that is the only kind of circuit an EE can build or even think about, and it has been so since 1892.

The only reason we have to consume fuel is to crank the shaft of that generator to restore its source dipole -- it is NOT to directly power our loads for our usage! The energy that actually powers the loads freely comes from the local vacuum, via the broken symmetry of the source dipole inside the generator once it is built (and then continually restored).

So the world energy crisis is due to the world fuel crisis. And the only reason we need to consume all that fuel is because of our horribly mutilated electrical engineering model and technology, which only can think and build SYMMETRICAL electrical power systems.

Thus we force all our EM systems to continually require fuel consumption from the nuclear power plant, the coal power plant, the natural gas power plant, etc. We can take a little bit of this required "source dipole restoring energy input" from the wind or from water currents or from solar radiation, but it is a mere pittance of what we need. For the brunt of what we need, the arbitrarily symmetrized EE circuit forces us to continually consume fuel.

So oddly the real reason for the world energy crisis and its coming giant economic collapse is our own inane symmetrized electrical engineering model, used in all our electrical power systems.

But all is not lost. Once we know this and realize it, we can very quickly solve the world energy crisis -- quickly, cheaply, cleanly, and permanently -- if we will but recognize that it is a physics problem, and not a standard electrical engineering problem. Electrical engineering is the problem, and it can thus never offer the "solution" in its present form.

For your information, we attach a Decision and Situation Briefing and a Briefing on a Manhattan Project to quickly and permanently solve the world energy crisis -- and sharply reduce global warming, carbon wastes, etc. world wide and thus very sharply start cleaning up our fragile and long-polluted biosphere.

I hope you give very serious attention to the attached two Briefings and to this little write-up for your information.

Best wishes,

Tom Bearden

P.S. the Decision Brief and the Manhattan Project Brief are also posted on my website www.cheniere.org, along with lots of other material on the subject."

http://www.cheniere.org/articles/index.html

More Thoughts On Brown

2008-09-14T13:52:00.000-07:00

Let me repeat a quote I included in an earlier post:

"....This fact is further demonstrated by another passage from Menen's book: "The Prime Minister, a busy politician, is not expected to understand the mysteries of high finance, while the Chancellor of the Exchequer [Budget Director] is only expected to understand them when he introduces the budget. Both are advised by the permanent officials of the Treasury, and these listen to the City. If they suspect that some policy of the government will [back-fire]... it is no use their calling up British ambassadors to ask if it is so; they can find out more quickly from the City. As one ambassador complained to me, diplomats are nowadays no more than office boys, and slow ones at that. "The City will know. They will tell the Treasury and the Treasury will tell the Prime Minister. Woe betide him if he does not listen. The most striking instance of this happened in recent history.

In 1956 the then Prime Minister, Sir Anthony Eden... launched a war to regain the Suez Canal. It had scarcely begun when the City let it be known that in a few days he would have no more money to fight it; the Pound would collapse. He stopped the war and was turned out of office by his party. When the Prime Minister rises to address the Lord Mayor's banquet, he hopes that the City will put more behind him than the gold plate lavishly displayed on the sideboard" (p. 18. History clearly reveals that the British government is the bond slave of the "invisible and inaudible" force centered in the City. The City calls the tune. The "visible and audible leaders" are mere puppets who dance to that tune on command. They have no power. They have no authority. In spite of all the outward show they are mere pawns in the game being played by the financial elite.” -- Des Griffin "Descent Into Slavery"

http://nationalisttruth1.blogspot.com/2008/02/banking-and-taxation-fundamental.html

I once heard an interesting radio play where a conman masquerading as Jesus Christ developed such a following that he forgot he was a conman and tried to be a force for good. I seem to recall it ended up with the "hero" being surrounded by armed police in a church - and being killed - anyone remember this play ? It could be that Gordon Brown might see himself in this role. No one under the present system of government can get to the top without a few skeletons in the cupboard.

I would like to draw the reader's attention to this article linked below an excerpt:

"THE GOVERNOR of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, has privately warned Downing Street that he will resign if Gordon Brown directs the bank to become the key agency in a state-backed mortgage guarantee system.

Transferring the risk of investing in mortgage-backed bonds from investors to the Treasury, a move that would see the government "underwriting" mortgage deals, is understood to be one of the key recommendations contained in the final report from Sir James Crosby, the former head of HBoS. Crosby was commissioned to look at new ways of reviving the UK's ailing mortgage market...."

http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.2446150.0.0.php

For a prime minister to go against the banks does not auger well for the prime minister. (There is justifiable speculation that JFK was killed because , amongst other things, he sought to break the monopoly of privately owned central banks.)

Some Thoughts About Nu Labour's Leadership "Problems"

2008-09-13T17:12:00.000-07:00

I don't think any thinking person could just blame Gordon Brown for the country's troubles. Blair passed on a poison chalice to him and I'm sure he knew full well he was doing so.

Just like the Tories, Nu Labour are "actors". Career actors who may or not know to varying degrees their puppet status in terms of the governance of the nation. To me nothing symbolises the puppet status of Labour as a supposed governing force more than the disproportionate number of women of no political talent or more to the point , "depth", in high positions of "power". There are exceptions of course, but women by and large are best when looking inwards and necessarily selfishly towards the welfare of their own families.

Whether the local Labour Party or the talking heads on the telly, I'm never sure whether their thoughts and actions are ideologically driven or "career" decisions. I think more of the latter, although, I'm sure most human beings can justify their actions with regard to higher principles if push comes to shove.

People did vote Labour more than any other party in the last elections, but most of the electorate instinctively knows that, to use a cliche, "all parties are the same". All parties are the same because the Establishment, over time with he complicity of the media, has provided a political menu of egg and chips or omlette and chips. People asking for alternative food are equated as having an appetite for eating babies etc. Consequently people don't vote and are fearful of offering themselves as a genuine political alternative. ( I thought the BNP was a genuine alternative but now know they are a state "safety valve". Nick Gri££in has actually recently said to a newspaper the BNP are a safety valve ! )

I hardly ever mention personalities in the Sandwell Labour group by name because I regard them with utter contempt. Some of them are intelligent people. As indeed are many actors. People, who have voted, have indeed voted Labour more than anyone else. The Labour MPs, to take Sandwell as an example are very superficial characters. The MP for Warley where I live , actually lives in Kent ! I've heard through the grapevine that the Smethwick Asian "mafia" fancy one of their councillors as the next parliamentary candidate.

Unfortunately or realistically speaking as it were, it would seem political people after a certain time use a political party as a career vehicle rather than as a means for changing things for the better. With regard to Labour's current leadership speculations, it seems to me that a group of actors are deciding what the new pecking order is going to be. Gordon Brown is not the cause of the country's troubles because he couldn't cause anything. The Conservatives will win the next election and careerists in Nu Labour's theatrical company will move up the greasy pole while others slip down it.

Police, Judges, Masons, Greenpeace, Politics and Corruption

2008-09-12T07:17:00.000-07:00

I was a little gob smacked that those Greenpeace activists weren't convicted after the damage they reportedly did to the cooling tower. That set me on a train of thought. Like all "grassroots" activists, they did have, if they haven't now, a great bloody big ship - I'm being sarcastic. Something wrong there methinks. Self styled environmentalists with a sufficient wedge to organise to that degree ? Seems suspicious to me. I'm all for genuine green politics within a nationalist context, but I find it odd that these born again hippies are singing from the same hymn sheet as the Establishment on the topic of "Global Warming".

So how did they get off ? I can't prove this, but I make the suggestion in light of the fact that many judges are bent, high up coppers are bent and there has been cheating in British elections, that it isn't too much further to suggest that juries are "chosen" for trials of a political nature. Apparently jurors are selected at random off the electoral roll -

BUT DOES CAN ANYONE TELL ME TO WHAT DEGREE WE CAN TRUST THIS SYSTEM ?

Let me speculate: Suppose the Establishment want "Global Warming" activists to get off. They can certainly make sure they have a sympathetic judge, but what if, they are able to discern people's political opinions by use of MI5, then use this information to make sure certain jurors are selected ? Is it too far to suggest that it's possible to detect a person's (political) disposition from what job they do, union they belong to, holiday destinations they prefer, shopping preferences and other information available on these people ? How difficult would it be to gather the information and give a senior civil servant responsible for "random" jury selection, the necessary "nudge nudge wink wink" handshake ?

I suggest that the Establishment is "grooming" the "Global Warming" "activists" in the same way that Anti Apartheid activists (who are now prominent in Nu Labour) were once "groomed". Clearly the next generation of political puppets will be ideal for promoting a global tax on carbon etc
............................

Here is an article from another interesting website concerned with corruption in Britain:

"The British police force is almost exclusively run by a masonic agenda and the MAIN reason the vast majority of the long suffering British public fear even having to call these evil barstewards when a crime is committed. How many people have had a positive outcome when British cops are involved in a case?

Masonic cops or more importantly masonic Chief Constables head the utterly evil system of law and order in the UK. Without Chief Constables turning a blind eye to the political and legal crooks mega scams they could not get away with the massive fleecing of an unsuspecting UK public. The memorandum of understanding between UK police and law societies the MAIN reason why the multi billion pound land and property fraud has gone on for so long. NEVER a whisper from the mass media about this most serious of issues.This is one of the MAIN MASONIC rackets and why so many high level masons live in luxurious homes through THEFT of other peoples land and property.

When time after time we read reports of high level criminal activity by British politicians and the INQUIRIES that follow, in 99% of cases NOTHING EVER HAPPENS. Why do so many ignore their duty and arrest and jail the criminals? Because so many of the power mongers in the UK eat out of the MASONIC trough. The main reason they are in positions of power, by selling their soul to the devil. Only extreme greed, vast corruption and devious blackmailing techniques , that feeds their network, ensures loyalty is either bought or assured when they have STUFF on their duped goons. Why do the mass media continue to promote political crooks and all the major political parties that have committed so much fraud and corruption ? Those parties are ALL run and funded by the masonic network .

The satanic rituals the goons go through to enter masonry become increasingly bizarre the further up the slippery masonic pole they climb . They thought their secret rituals would protect them from exposure . They thought their mass media lodge buddies would ensure their scams goes on unreported.They thought this evil pyramid system would go on ad infinitum . They did not realize that in time technological advances would break the back of their control . Their victims would have a means to WARN the public of the EXTREME dangers of becoming one of their targets.

Many victims, to this day, do not realize they have been swindled by masons operating via the legal and political systems of the UK and that the British crown is operated and controlled by the masonic network and answerable to the British monarchy. Thousands of lives each year destroyed in civil courts run by masonic judges and a completely fabricated legal system who's primary role is to destroy anyone dragged into their vortex while leaving them homeless and penniless. Masonic cops aiding and abetting masonic bailiffs ordered by masonic judges to throw you onto the street.

For anyone as yet to face this extreme tyranny, be aware that unless you go to great lengths to protect what wealth you have created during your lifetime these fascists will use their masonic network of banks, government agencies ,councils ,lawyers,police and a myriad of other masonic spy networks to find where your hard earned cash is and ensure it is stolen by any means possible. Your home is the easiest target as you can't lug bricks and mortar in a suitcase when they come after you, and they will in time , and why we are encouraged to put all our money into our home and their banks.

THEY ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER a devious bunch of criminal degenerates who think they can get away with ALL of this indefinitely. While their mass media buddies are looking by the day even more complicit in the cover up of their crimes. We know of many victims who went to the British press and media only to be completely ignored . This while they write articles about despotic acts across the globe by dictators like MUGABE when we have a far more sinister and secretive mob destroying peoples lives on a daily basis in the UK. "

http://www.internationalmensorganisation.info/

Seven Years On

2008-09-11T04:14:00.001-07:00

Seven years on from the September 11th attacks good people know this was an inside job. Others can't be bothered to investigate. They can't get past the initial notion that a government could do that to its own people.

What can one say ? An intelligent professional bloke I occasionally have a drink with received a couple of introductory links on the subject. He hasn't read them. Like many things happening in the world, "9/11 Truth" doesn't rest with people's ability to compare and contrast opposing viewpoints, but with their inertia in concerning themselves with things that don't seemingly impinge on their life/comfort zone/mortgage/job/girlfriend/garden/car/football team/hair style/night out/career etc etc

Is There A Cure For Cancer ?

2008-09-09T06:59:00.000-07:00

Is there a cure for cancer ? I came across this idea a long time ago. Perhaps the individual should consider the information provided for themselves. It would be wrong to offer false hope, but it would also be wrong not to pass on information that may help alleviate suffering:

http://www.naturalnews.com/012923.html

http://www.amazon.co.uk/World-Without-Cancer-Story-Vitamin/dp/0912986190

I usually read book reviews on Amazon.com rather than Amazon.co.uk because there are more of them !

http://www.amazon.com/World-Without-Cancer-Story-Vitamin/dp/0912986190/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1220970767&sr=8-1

Council use anti-terror laws to spy on binmen accused of 'accepting strawberry pop bribe to take away trade waste'

2008-09-07T14:09:00.000-07:00

How did our civilisation ever cope before the Commission for Racial Equality and Council Surveillance ?

"A council used controversial anti-terror laws to spy on a crew of refuse collectors after receiving a tip-off that they were incorrectly emptying a dustbin.

Officials set up an undercover surveillance operation in an attempt to prove the three binmen were being bribed by a newsagent to take away trade waste when he had not paid the extra fee for it to be collected.

Bury Council in Greater Manchester said the investigation proved that the men had removed trade waste - and it also claimed they had used their refuse truck for ‘pecuniary gain’ because one accepted a bottle of strawberry-flavoured mineral water from the shopkeeper."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1053039/Council-use-anti-terror-laws-spy-binmen-accused-accepting-strawberry-pop-bribe-away-trade-waste.html

Another Alternative Energy Inventor Killed ?

2008-09-03T12:55:00.000-07:00

A modern scientific hero Tom Bearden relates how in his groundbreaking book "Energy From The Vacuum" how the Establishment will bribe, threaten and even kill to preserve the oil industry and related interests.

Here is possibly another victim in the list:

"

A man by the name of Stefan Nystrom invented a way to generate energy from ocean waves that he claims would cost 5% of what coal energy does.

He set up a proto-type in Ghana and, initially, claims to have found many potential investors. However, suddenly problems started to pop up. The investors, originally extremely enthusiastic, started to back off. He was offered bribes in order to quit. Finally, he began to be harassed by Ghanaian police and mercenaries.

He contacted me in hopes of getting protection. I told him to come to Japan. He told me he was not allowed to leave the country. He said they had taken parts from his prototype. I said I would see what I could do. Before I could do anything, yesterday I received a disturbing set of phone calls from a very scared sounding Mr. Nystrom. "They tried to kill me three times today," he screamed into the phone. Then I lost contact with him, and his phone has been switched off.

In his last call, he asked me to make his technology public. So, here below is a description of his technology. Would people please pass it on and would as many people, in a tribute to a man who has probably been killed by mercenaries hired by the oil industry, and make sure that prototypes are developed.

http://www.wavepartner.eu/page_1219330357093.html

Benjamin Fulford"

http://rense.com/general83/been.htm

Serbian scientist/inventor/engineer Nikolai Tesla was prevented by the banker J P Morgan from transmitting free energy because you “couldn’t put a meter on it” . There’s plenty of stuff on the internet about Tesla. In my estimation he was the greatest genius of the 19/20^th Century, if not in a thousand years.

The “New World Order” as they have called themselves, although they are, if you think about it, actually the “Old World Order”, are very very very frightened of the “democratisation” of energy” (to coin a term).

It follows inexorably that we, as Nationalists, Anti Globalists and those seeking a just world, should proclaim what they are frightened of.

The puppet political parties have arisen as they have done because they are the Establishment’s adaptation to the ignorance of the masses. The world has only ever moved forward, if at all, by the skills and courage of a few and the genius of even fewer. Enjoy this video on Tesla...

Sun Makes History: First Spotless Month in a Century

2008-09-02T07:31:00.000-07:00

"Drop in solar activity has potential effect for climate on earth.

The sun has reached a milestone not seen for nearly 100 years: an entire month has passed without a single visible sunspot being noted.

The event is significant as many climatologists now believe solar magnetic activity – which determines the number of sunspots -- is an influencing factor for climate on earth.

According to data from Mount Wilson Observatory, UCLA, more than an entire month has passed without a spot. The last time such an event occurred was June of 1913. Sunspot data has been collected since 1749.

When the sun is active, it's not uncommon to see sunspot numbers of 100 or more in a single month. Every 11 years, activity slows, and numbers briefly drop to near-zero. Normally sunspots return very quickly, as a new cycle begins.

But this year -- which corresponds to the start of Solar Cycle 24 -- has been extraordinarily long and quiet, with the first seven months averaging a sunspot number of only 3. August followed with none at all. The astonishing rapid drop of the past year has defied predictions, and caught nearly all astronomers by surprise.

In 2005, a pair of astronomers from the National Solar Observatory (NSO) in Tucson attempted to publish a paper in the journal Science. The pair looked at minute spectroscopic and magnetic changes in the sun. By extrapolating forward, they reached the startling result that, within 10 years, sunspots would vanish entirely. At the time, the sun was very active. Most of their peers laughed at what they considered an unsubstantiated conclusion.

The journal ultimately rejected the paper as being too controversial."

http://www.dailytech.com/Sun+Makes+History+First+Spotless+Month+in+a+Century/article12823.htm

But you can't tax the sun, so let's say "global warming", hmmm, I mean "climate change" is caused by human's carbon dioxide production !

(Another interesting link: CLIMATE CHANGE: It's official: the world is cooling, not warming )

Our Corrupt Legal System Yet Again

2008-08-31T04:19:00.000-07:00

Firstly:

I draw your attention to the murderer of Keith Brown, Habib Khan, who got only eight years for "manslaughter". Councillor Martin Coleman summed it up well:

"It bears no relationship with any form of justice that I understand, can understand recognise or accept. We've got a man who has been murdered in the street. Someone has ran out into the public street with a knife and murdered a man and the judge says there's literally no case to answer. I think what we've witnessed here is an outrageous betrayal of justice."

More on NWN
http://northwestnationalists.blogspot.com/2008/08/prison-for-bnp-activists-killer-khan.html

Secondly:
The Hutton whitewash regarding the murder of David Kelly. How about this for further evidence :

"Ms Pederson, a former US Air Force officer, met Dr Kelly when she was assigned to work in 1998 as a translator for the UN weapons inspection team in Iraq.

And she revealed in an interview with The Mail on Sunday that, in the months leading to his death, the right-handed scientist was unable to use his right hand for tasks requiring strength because of a painful injury to his right elbow.

According to Ms Pederson, when she dined with Dr Kelly at a Washington restaurant in the spring of 2003, the hand’s grip was so weak that he struggled to get a knife through a steak he had ordered.

The linguist, who counselled Dr Kelly during his conversion to the Baha’i religious faith that she follows, says he had begun to favour his left hand for even relatively minor tasks, a tendency she observed on numerous other occasions."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1050919/David-Kellys-closest-female-confidante-COULDNT-killed-himself.html

WE CANNOT EXPECT JUSTICE THROUGH OUR POLITICISED JUDICIARY. WE HAVE TO EDUCATE THE PEOPLE. ONLY A POPULAR MASS MOVEMENT THAT ISN'T SIDETRACKED BY WASTING MONEY ON LAWYERS WILL SUCCEED.

"Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment nothing can fail. Without it nothing can succeed. He who molds opinion is greater than he who enacts laws." - Lincoln